Mikel Jimenez, Christian Andrade, Antonio Prieto, Anna Grubert, José A Hinojosa, Pedro R Montoro
{"title":"Temporal Dynamics of Visual Awareness as a Function of the Level of Processing of the Stimulus and Report Requirements: An ERP Study.","authors":"Mikel Jimenez, Christian Andrade, Antonio Prieto, Anna Grubert, José A Hinojosa, Pedro R Montoro","doi":"10.1111/psyp.70411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent evidence suggests that the stimulus level of processing (LoP) modulates the two event-related potential (ERP) correlates of visual awareness-the visual awareness negativity (VAN) and late positivity (LP)-yet it remains unclear whether LoP also affects their temporal dynamics. In addition, recent studies using no-report paradigms have raised doubts about whether the LP constitutes a genuine correlate of awareness. In this study, we examined the ERP correlates of visual awareness and its temporal dynamics as a function of stimulus level of processing (LoP) and report condition (report vs. no-report). In the report condition, participants performed either a low-level (color: blue vs. red) or high-level (category: animal vs. object) discrimination task and indicated whether they had seen the target. In the no-report condition, they counted occurrences of a task-irrelevant but LoP-congruent stimulus. We computed the VAN and LP by pooling aware and unaware trials within each condition. The VAN component was absent in both tasks and report condition, likely influenced by early sensory activity and variations in stimulus-mask SOA. The LP was clearly visible across conditions, yet its amplitude was not modulated by the LoP. Critically, significant LP components were observed in both report and no-report conditions; although attenuated and slightly delayed in no-report trials, the LP remained present. This pattern replicates previous findings showing that the LP/P3 is sensitive to post-perceptual task demands yet also shows that it may persist even when response-related processes are removed. These findings suggest that late post-VAN activity may not correspond to a single unified ERP component but rather reflect a combination of post-perceptual processes and aspects of conscious stimulus evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":20913,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":"63 10","pages":"e70411"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70411","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Recent evidence suggests that the stimulus level of processing (LoP) modulates the two event-related potential (ERP) correlates of visual awareness-the visual awareness negativity (VAN) and late positivity (LP)-yet it remains unclear whether LoP also affects their temporal dynamics. In addition, recent studies using no-report paradigms have raised doubts about whether the LP constitutes a genuine correlate of awareness. In this study, we examined the ERP correlates of visual awareness and its temporal dynamics as a function of stimulus level of processing (LoP) and report condition (report vs. no-report). In the report condition, participants performed either a low-level (color: blue vs. red) or high-level (category: animal vs. object) discrimination task and indicated whether they had seen the target. In the no-report condition, they counted occurrences of a task-irrelevant but LoP-congruent stimulus. We computed the VAN and LP by pooling aware and unaware trials within each condition. The VAN component was absent in both tasks and report condition, likely influenced by early sensory activity and variations in stimulus-mask SOA. The LP was clearly visible across conditions, yet its amplitude was not modulated by the LoP. Critically, significant LP components were observed in both report and no-report conditions; although attenuated and slightly delayed in no-report trials, the LP remained present. This pattern replicates previous findings showing that the LP/P3 is sensitive to post-perceptual task demands yet also shows that it may persist even when response-related processes are removed. These findings suggest that late post-VAN activity may not correspond to a single unified ERP component but rather reflect a combination of post-perceptual processes and aspects of conscious stimulus evaluation.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1964, Psychophysiology is the most established journal in the world specifically dedicated to the dissemination of psychophysiological science. The journal continues to play a key role in advancing human neuroscience in its many forms and methodologies (including central and peripheral measures), covering research on the interrelationships between the physiological and psychological aspects of brain and behavior. Typically, studies published in Psychophysiology include psychological independent variables and noninvasive physiological dependent variables (hemodynamic, optical, and electromagnetic brain imaging and/or peripheral measures such as respiratory sinus arrhythmia, electromyography, pupillography, and many others). The majority of studies published in the journal involve human participants, but work using animal models of such phenomena is occasionally published. Psychophysiology welcomes submissions on new theoretical, empirical, and methodological advances in: cognitive, affective, clinical and social neuroscience, psychopathology and psychiatry, health science and behavioral medicine, and biomedical engineering. The journal publishes theoretical papers, evaluative reviews of literature, empirical papers, and methodological papers, with submissions welcome from scientists in any fields mentioned above.