The effect of increased feeding occasions per day on the incidence of tail biting-a case report.

IF 3.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Hanna Andersson, Magdalena Jacobson
{"title":"The effect of increased feeding occasions per day on the incidence of tail biting-a case report.","authors":"Hanna Andersson, Magdalena Jacobson","doi":"10.1186/s40813-026-00537-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tail biting is a recurring and severe problem in the pig production, being provoked by a multitude of underlying factors predisposing for an abnormal behaviour. Risk factors include feed-related factors such as restricted feeding, a high-energy, low-fibre ration, unpredicted feeding times, and competition for food. In 2010, an increase in the number of feeding bouts from three to four times a day was implemented in a Swedish finisher farm. Following this change, a decrease in the number of pigs with tail lesions being recorded at slaughter, and a drop in the number of pigs treated with antibiotics for tail biting, was noted. The aim of this study was to investigate retrospectively the effect of changing the number of feeding times per day in 15 868 pigs being bred during 15 months before (Period 1) to 15 months after (Period 2) this change was implemented, including the remarks for tail biting at slaughter, the number of pigs treated for tail biting, the daily weight gain (DWG) and the feed conversion ratio (FCR) during these periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 6390 pigs in Period 1, and 9478 pigs in Period 2, were included. The average number of remarks for tail lesions at slaughter was reduced from 147 pigs to 113 pigs, a reduction by 54% (p < 0.001). The number of pigs subject to antibiotic treatment for \"tail biting\" was reduced from 0.9% to 0.6%, a reduction by 35% (p < 0.01). The average DWG during Period 1 was 790 g/day and during Period 2, the DWG was 830 g/day (p < 0.0007). The FCR as measured by MJ/kg growth was 38.5 MJ/kg during Period 1, and 37.2 MJ/kg growth during Period 2 (p < 0.024).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An increase in the number of feeding bouts from three to four times daily seems to reduce the frequency of tail biting, as monitored by the number of remarks at slaughter and the number of treatments for tail biting. Further, the increase resulted in a higher average daily weight gain and in a decrease in the feed conversion ratio.</p>","PeriodicalId":20352,"journal":{"name":"Porcine Health Management","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13632246/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Porcine Health Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-026-00537-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tail biting is a recurring and severe problem in the pig production, being provoked by a multitude of underlying factors predisposing for an abnormal behaviour. Risk factors include feed-related factors such as restricted feeding, a high-energy, low-fibre ration, unpredicted feeding times, and competition for food. In 2010, an increase in the number of feeding bouts from three to four times a day was implemented in a Swedish finisher farm. Following this change, a decrease in the number of pigs with tail lesions being recorded at slaughter, and a drop in the number of pigs treated with antibiotics for tail biting, was noted. The aim of this study was to investigate retrospectively the effect of changing the number of feeding times per day in 15 868 pigs being bred during 15 months before (Period 1) to 15 months after (Period 2) this change was implemented, including the remarks for tail biting at slaughter, the number of pigs treated for tail biting, the daily weight gain (DWG) and the feed conversion ratio (FCR) during these periods.

Results: In total 6390 pigs in Period 1, and 9478 pigs in Period 2, were included. The average number of remarks for tail lesions at slaughter was reduced from 147 pigs to 113 pigs, a reduction by 54% (p < 0.001). The number of pigs subject to antibiotic treatment for "tail biting" was reduced from 0.9% to 0.6%, a reduction by 35% (p < 0.01). The average DWG during Period 1 was 790 g/day and during Period 2, the DWG was 830 g/day (p < 0.0007). The FCR as measured by MJ/kg growth was 38.5 MJ/kg during Period 1, and 37.2 MJ/kg growth during Period 2 (p < 0.024).

Conclusion: An increase in the number of feeding bouts from three to four times daily seems to reduce the frequency of tail biting, as monitored by the number of remarks at slaughter and the number of treatments for tail biting. Further, the increase resulted in a higher average daily weight gain and in a decrease in the feed conversion ratio.

每天增加喂食次数对咬尾发生率的影响- 1例报告。
背景:咬尾是生猪生产中一个反复出现的严重问题,是由多种潜在因素引起的,容易导致一种异常行为。风险因素包括与饲料有关的因素,如限制喂养、高能量、低纤维日粮、不可预测的喂养时间以及对食物的竞争。2010年,瑞典一家育肥场将饲喂次数从每天三次增加到四次。在这一变化之后,在屠宰时记录的有尾巴损伤的猪的数量有所减少,并且由于咬尾而接受抗生素治疗的猪的数量也有所下降。本研究的目的是回顾性调查在实施这一改变前15个月(第1期)至后15个月(第2期)期间饲养的15868头猪改变每天饲喂次数的影响,包括屠宰时咬尾的评论、咬尾猪的数量、这些时期的日增重(DWG)和饲料系数(FCR)。结果:一期共纳入生猪6390头,二期共纳入生猪9478头。屠宰时对尾损的平均批注次数从147头减少到113头,减少了54% (p结论:根据屠宰批注次数和咬尾治疗次数的监测,喂食次数从每天3次增加到4次似乎减少了咬尾的频率。此外,这一增加导致平均日增重增加,饲料系数降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Porcine Health Management
Porcine Health Management Veterinary-Food Animals
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
49
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Porcine Health Management (PHM) is an open access peer-reviewed journal that aims to publish relevant, novel and revised information regarding all aspects of swine health medicine and production.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书