Glycaemic trends, trajectories and control during TB treatment and its association with TB treatment outcome among patients with TB-diabetes multimorbidity.
{"title":"Glycaemic trends, trajectories and control during TB treatment and its association with TB treatment outcome among patients with TB-diabetes multimorbidity.","authors":"Maham Zahid, Mahmoud Danaee, Saima Aleem, Saima Afaq","doi":"10.12669/pjms.42.9.19455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to examine longitudinal glycaemic patterns, including trends, trajectories, and control during TB treatment, and their association with treatment outcomes in patients with Tuberculosis (TB) diabetes multimorbidity.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Analytical cross-sectional study was conducted, involving secondary analysis of an implementation study conducted at 13 Tuberculosis clinics in KPK and Punjab from June 2022 to June 2025. Random blood glucose (RBG) and glycated haemoglobin were measured at baseline, three months, and six months. Glycaemic trends, trajectories, and control status were reviewed, TB treatment outcomes were assessed at six months and associations were assessed using complete case and imputed datasets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 251 participants, the mean age was 52.0±12.7 years and 60.6% (152/251) were males. Overall, 74.5% (187/251) achieved successful while 64 (25.5%) experienced unsuccessful TB treatment outcomes. TB treatment outcomes showed no significant association with RBG and HbA1c trends or trajectories in the complete case analysis (n=202) However, imputed dataset showed that the occurrence of unsuccessful outcome was higher as compared to successful outcome among those with uncontrolled RBG (96.9% vs 74.3%, p<0.001) and uncontrolled HbA1c (96.6% vs 67.9%, p<0.001), respectively. Binary logistic regression showed higher odds of experiencing unsuccessful outcome as compared to successful outcome due to uncontrolled RBG (OR=6.9; 95%CI: 1.8-27.7) and HbA1c (OR=9.0; 95%CI: 2.3-36.0).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Longitudinal glycaemic patterns showed that most patients with TB-diabetes multimorbidity had uncontrolled glycaemia during treatment, which may affect TB outcomes. Larger studies are needed to better understand these relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":19958,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"42 9","pages":"2595-2602"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13624460/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.42.9.19455","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to examine longitudinal glycaemic patterns, including trends, trajectories, and control during TB treatment, and their association with treatment outcomes in patients with Tuberculosis (TB) diabetes multimorbidity.
Methodology: Analytical cross-sectional study was conducted, involving secondary analysis of an implementation study conducted at 13 Tuberculosis clinics in KPK and Punjab from June 2022 to June 2025. Random blood glucose (RBG) and glycated haemoglobin were measured at baseline, three months, and six months. Glycaemic trends, trajectories, and control status were reviewed, TB treatment outcomes were assessed at six months and associations were assessed using complete case and imputed datasets.
Results: Among 251 participants, the mean age was 52.0±12.7 years and 60.6% (152/251) were males. Overall, 74.5% (187/251) achieved successful while 64 (25.5%) experienced unsuccessful TB treatment outcomes. TB treatment outcomes showed no significant association with RBG and HbA1c trends or trajectories in the complete case analysis (n=202) However, imputed dataset showed that the occurrence of unsuccessful outcome was higher as compared to successful outcome among those with uncontrolled RBG (96.9% vs 74.3%, p<0.001) and uncontrolled HbA1c (96.6% vs 67.9%, p<0.001), respectively. Binary logistic regression showed higher odds of experiencing unsuccessful outcome as compared to successful outcome due to uncontrolled RBG (OR=6.9; 95%CI: 1.8-27.7) and HbA1c (OR=9.0; 95%CI: 2.3-36.0).
Conclusion: Longitudinal glycaemic patterns showed that most patients with TB-diabetes multimorbidity had uncontrolled glycaemia during treatment, which may affect TB outcomes. Larger studies are needed to better understand these relationships.
目的:本研究旨在检查结核(TB)糖尿病多病患者的纵向血糖模式,包括趋势、轨迹和控制,以及它们与治疗结果的关系。方法:进行了分析性横断面研究,涉及对2022年6月至2025年6月在KPK和旁遮普省13家结核病诊所进行的实施研究的二次分析。随机血糖(RBG)和糖化血红蛋白分别在基线、3个月和6个月时测量。研究人员回顾了血糖趋势、轨迹和控制状况,评估了6个月时的结核病治疗结果,并使用完整的病例和输入数据集评估了相关关系。结果:251名参与者平均年龄为52.0±12.7岁,男性占60.6%(152/251)。总体而言,74.5%(187/251)获得成功,64(25.5%)经历了不成功的结核病治疗结果。在完整的病例分析中,TB治疗结果与RBG和HbA1c趋势或轨迹没有显著关联(n=202)。然而,输入的数据集显示,在RBG不受控制的患者中,不成功结果的发生率高于成功结果(96.9% vs 74.3%)。结论:纵向血糖模式显示,大多数TB-糖尿病多病患者在治疗期间血糖不受控制,这可能影响TB预后。需要更大规模的研究来更好地理解这些关系。
期刊介绍:
It is a peer reviewed medical journal published regularly since 1984. It was previously known as quarterly "SPECIALIST" till December 31st 1999. It publishes original research articles, review articles, current practices, short communications & case reports. It attracts manuscripts not only from within Pakistan but also from over fifty countries from abroad.
Copies of PJMS are sent to all the import medical libraries all over Pakistan and overseas particularly in South East Asia and Asia Pacific besides WHO EMRO Region countries. Eminent members of the medical profession at home and abroad regularly contribute their write-ups, manuscripts in our publications. We pursue an independent editorial policy, which allows an opportunity to the healthcare professionals to express their views without any fear or favour. That is why many opinion makers among the medical and pharmaceutical profession use this publication to communicate their viewpoint.