Efficacy of Tympanic Membrane Regeneration Therapy for Secondary Cholesteatoma With Tympanic Membrane Perforation.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Shin-Ichi Kanemaru, Tomoya Yamaguchi, Rie Kanai, Eriko Otonari, Maki Yamasoba, Yuki Fujii, Kazunari Nishimura, Hiroyuki Harada, Toshiki Maetani
{"title":"Efficacy of Tympanic Membrane Regeneration Therapy for Secondary Cholesteatoma With Tympanic Membrane Perforation.","authors":"Shin-Ichi Kanemaru, Tomoya Yamaguchi, Rie Kanai, Eriko Otonari, Maki Yamasoba, Yuki Fujii, Kazunari Nishimura, Hiroyuki Harada, Toshiki Maetani","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000005079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effectiveness of tympanic membrane (TM) regeneration therapy (TMRT) for secondary cholesteatoma (SC) with TM perforation (TMP).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective case review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>General hospitals.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>The study included 38 patients (41 ears) with SC (M/F: 21/17, aged 12 to 86 y) who underwent TMRT and 33 patients (33 ears) with SC (M/F: 15/18, aged 20 to 75 y) who underwent conventional tympanoplasty (CTP).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>During TMRT, an endoscope was used to remove all of the remaining TM, leaving the annulus intact, and then the cholesteatoma was removed completely. For TM repair, the edge of the TMP was disrupted mechanically, and a gelatin sponge immersed in basic fibroblast growth factor was placed inside and outside the tympanic cavity and covered with fibrin glue. The protocol was repeated up to 4 times until closure was complete.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Operative time, TMP closure rate, and hearing improvement were evaluated. Adverse events, including cholesteatoma recurrence, were monitored for at least 3 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The surgical time, TM closure rate, and cholesteatoma recurrence rate were 65 minutes, 100% (41/41 ears), and 2.4% (1/41) in the TMRT group and 125 minutes, 93.9% (31/33), and 9.1% (3/33) in the CTP group, respectively. The average hearing improvements were 12.2 and 7.5 dB in the TMRT and CTP groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TMRT achieved excellent TM closure, favorable hearing outcomes, and acceptable cholesteatoma control during the short-to-mid-term follow-up period in patients with SC. TMRT may be expanded beyond simple TMPs to selected cases of SC.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000005079","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of tympanic membrane (TM) regeneration therapy (TMRT) for secondary cholesteatoma (SC) with TM perforation (TMP).

Study design: Retrospective case review.

Setting: General hospitals.

Patients: The study included 38 patients (41 ears) with SC (M/F: 21/17, aged 12 to 86 y) who underwent TMRT and 33 patients (33 ears) with SC (M/F: 15/18, aged 20 to 75 y) who underwent conventional tympanoplasty (CTP).

Interventions: During TMRT, an endoscope was used to remove all of the remaining TM, leaving the annulus intact, and then the cholesteatoma was removed completely. For TM repair, the edge of the TMP was disrupted mechanically, and a gelatin sponge immersed in basic fibroblast growth factor was placed inside and outside the tympanic cavity and covered with fibrin glue. The protocol was repeated up to 4 times until closure was complete.

Main outcome measures: Operative time, TMP closure rate, and hearing improvement were evaluated. Adverse events, including cholesteatoma recurrence, were monitored for at least 3 years.

Results: The surgical time, TM closure rate, and cholesteatoma recurrence rate were 65 minutes, 100% (41/41 ears), and 2.4% (1/41) in the TMRT group and 125 minutes, 93.9% (31/33), and 9.1% (3/33) in the CTP group, respectively. The average hearing improvements were 12.2 and 7.5 dB in the TMRT and CTP groups, respectively.

Conclusions: TMRT achieved excellent TM closure, favorable hearing outcomes, and acceptable cholesteatoma control during the short-to-mid-term follow-up period in patients with SC. TMRT may be expanded beyond simple TMPs to selected cases of SC.

鼓膜再生治疗继发性胆脂瘤伴鼓膜穿孔的疗效观察。
目的:探讨鼓膜再生疗法(TMRT)治疗伴有鼓膜穿孔(TMP)的继发性胆脂瘤(SC)的疗效。研究设计:回顾性病例回顾。工作地点:综合医院。患者:该研究包括38例(41耳)SC患者(男/女:21/17,年龄12至86岁)接受TMRT和33例(33耳)SC患者(男/女:15/18,年龄20至75岁)接受常规鼓室成形术(CTP)。干预措施:在TMRT期间,在内窥镜下切除所有剩余的TM,留下环完整,然后完全切除胆脂瘤。对于TM修复,机械破坏TMP边缘,在鼓室内外放置浸没碱性成纤维细胞生长因子的明胶海绵,并用纤维蛋白胶覆盖。该方案最多重复4次,直到闭合完成。主要观察指标:评估手术时间、TMP闭合率和听力改善情况。不良事件,包括胆脂瘤复发,至少监测3年。结果:TMRT组手术时间为65分钟,TM闭合率为100%(41/41耳),胆脂瘤复发率为2.4%(1/41耳);CTP组手术时间为125分钟,TM闭合率为93.9%(31/33耳),胆脂瘤复发率为9.1%(3/33耳)。TMRT组和CTP组的平均听力改善分别为12.2和7.5 dB。结论:在SC患者的中短期随访期间,TMRT获得了良好的TM关闭效果,良好的听力结果,以及可接受的胆脂瘤控制。TMRT可以从单纯的TMPs扩展到特定的SC病例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书