Psychological Factors Associated With Discrepancies Between Subjective Balance Confidence and Objective Performance of Patients With Unilateral Vestibular Hypofunction.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Hirofumi Ogihara, Tomohiko Kamo, Masato Azami, Ryozo Tanaka, Takumi Kato, Reiko Tsunoda, Hiroaki Fushiki
{"title":"Psychological Factors Associated With Discrepancies Between Subjective Balance Confidence and Objective Performance of Patients With Unilateral Vestibular Hypofunction.","authors":"Hirofumi Ogihara, Tomohiko Kamo, Masato Azami, Ryozo Tanaka, Takumi Kato, Reiko Tsunoda, Hiroaki Fushiki","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000005091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Discrepancies between subjective balance confidence and objective performance may have clinical consequences in patients with vestibular hypofunction. Overestimation may increase fall risks, whereas underestimation may lead to unnecessary activity restriction. The contributing factors remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A primary care outpatient clinic.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>This study included 160 patients with unilateral vestibular hypofunction.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The subjective-objective balance discrepancy was quantified using z-score standardization of the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale and Functional Gait Assessment (Z_ABC-Z_FGA). Associations between dizziness-related disability, anxiety, and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS) were examined using hierarchical regression with interaction terms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overestimation was observed in 54.4% of patients; the remaining 45.6% underestimated it. The overestimation group showed lower dizziness-related disability than the underestimation group (33.6±21.0 vs. 45.8±22.0, P=0.001). Dizziness-related disability was independently associated with discrepancy scores (β=-0.327, P<0.001). In exploratory analyses using the dichotomized clinical HADS classification, anxiety (β=-0.315, P<0.001) and depression (β=-0.224, P=0.010) were associated with greater underestimation, attenuated in the overestimation group. These associations were only partly reproduced with continuous HADS scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Anxiety and depression were associated with the discrepancy, mainly in patients who underestimated their balance ability, whereas dizziness-related disability was independently associated with it. These findings suggest that psychological distress relates to negative self-evaluation of balance and should be considered alongside performance-based measures when interpreting self-reported balance confidence in vestibular rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000005091","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Discrepancies between subjective balance confidence and objective performance may have clinical consequences in patients with vestibular hypofunction. Overestimation may increase fall risks, whereas underestimation may lead to unnecessary activity restriction. The contributing factors remain unclear.

Study design: Observational study.

Setting: A primary care outpatient clinic.

Patients: This study included 160 patients with unilateral vestibular hypofunction.

Main outcome measures: The subjective-objective balance discrepancy was quantified using z-score standardization of the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale and Functional Gait Assessment (Z_ABC-Z_FGA). Associations between dizziness-related disability, anxiety, and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS) were examined using hierarchical regression with interaction terms.

Results: Overestimation was observed in 54.4% of patients; the remaining 45.6% underestimated it. The overestimation group showed lower dizziness-related disability than the underestimation group (33.6±21.0 vs. 45.8±22.0, P=0.001). Dizziness-related disability was independently associated with discrepancy scores (β=-0.327, P<0.001). In exploratory analyses using the dichotomized clinical HADS classification, anxiety (β=-0.315, P<0.001) and depression (β=-0.224, P=0.010) were associated with greater underestimation, attenuated in the overestimation group. These associations were only partly reproduced with continuous HADS scores.

Conclusions: Anxiety and depression were associated with the discrepancy, mainly in patients who underestimated their balance ability, whereas dizziness-related disability was independently associated with it. These findings suggest that psychological distress relates to negative self-evaluation of balance and should be considered alongside performance-based measures when interpreting self-reported balance confidence in vestibular rehabilitation.

单侧前庭功能减退患者主观平衡信心与客观表现差异的相关心理因素。
目的:前庭功能减退患者的主观平衡信心与客观表现之间的差异可能会导致临床后果。高估可能会增加跌倒的风险,而低估可能会导致不必要的活动限制。影响因素尚不清楚。研究设计:观察性研究。环境:初级保健门诊诊所。患者:本研究包括160例单侧前庭功能减退患者。主要结果测量:主客观平衡差异采用特定活动平衡置信度量表和功能步态评估(Z_ABC-Z_FGA)的z-score标准化进行量化。使用带交互项的层次回归检验眩晕相关残疾、焦虑和抑郁之间的关联(医院焦虑和抑郁量表,HADS)。结果:54.4%的患者出现高估;剩下的45.6%低估了这个数字。高估组的眩晕相关残疾低于低估组(33.6±21.0比45.8±22.0,P=0.001)。眩晕相关失能与差异评分独立相关(β=-0.327, p)。结论:焦虑和抑郁与差异评分相关,主要发生在低估平衡能力的患者中,而眩晕相关失能与差异评分独立相关。这些研究结果表明,心理困扰与平衡的负面自我评价有关,在解释前庭康复中自我报告的平衡信心时,应将其与基于表现的措施一起考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书