Assessment of pleural effusion using intracavitary contrast-enhanced ultrasound: a pilot study.

IF 2.9 3区 生物学 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PeerJ Pub Date : 2026-10-02 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.7717/peerj.21765
Dachuan Tang, Dan Wang, Zhongyu Li, Bohan Lu, Huiming Yi, Wei Zhang
{"title":"Assessment of pleural effusion using intracavitary contrast-enhanced ultrasound: a pilot study.","authors":"Dachuan Tang, Dan Wang, Zhongyu Li, Bohan Lu, Huiming Yi, Wei Zhang","doi":"10.7717/peerj.21765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To address the limitations of current imaging modalities, the present study aimed to develop and validate a novel intracavitary contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) approach for the quantitative assessment of pleural effusion (PE) volume and differentiation of exudative PE from transudative PE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study prospectively enrolled 100 patients with PE undergoing US-guided thoracentesis. Intracavitary CEUS was performed using SonoVue microbubbles, and time-intensity curve parameters (A, B, and A+B) were analyzed. PE volume was measured based on the drainage volume, and effusions were classified as exudates or transudates according to Light's criteria. Diagnostic performance was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and a linear regression model was developed to predict PE volume.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Exudative PE showed significantly higher baseline intensity parameter B (-35.18 ± 5.17 <i>vs.</i> -41.41 ± 8.64, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and lower peak intensity increment parameter A (1.20 ±  3.27 <i>vs.</i> 6.61 ± 6.10, <i>p</i> < 0.01) compared to transudative PE. The combined parameter A+B (steady-state microbubble concentration index) showed a strong correlation with PE volume (<i>r</i> = 0.912, <i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.831), yielding the predictive model: V(mL) = -33.345 × (A+B) - 453.071 (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.950). The ROC analysis revealed moderate diagnostic accuracy for the A value (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.779) and B value (AUC = 0.719) in differentiating exudative PE from transudative PE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intracavitary CEUS could serve as a reliable, minimally invasive, feasible radiation-free adjunctive technique for quantifying PE volume and differentiating exudative versus transudative PE in patients undergoing thoracentesis. The A+B-based regression model provides high predictive accuracy, while A and B values facilitate effusion classification. This quantitative CEUS workflow may facilitate clinical decision-making, and its utility for serial monitoring requires further verification in large-scale real-world cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":19799,"journal":{"name":"PeerJ","volume":"14 ","pages":"e21765"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13637638/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PeerJ","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.21765","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To address the limitations of current imaging modalities, the present study aimed to develop and validate a novel intracavitary contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) approach for the quantitative assessment of pleural effusion (PE) volume and differentiation of exudative PE from transudative PE.

Methods: This cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study prospectively enrolled 100 patients with PE undergoing US-guided thoracentesis. Intracavitary CEUS was performed using SonoVue microbubbles, and time-intensity curve parameters (A, B, and A+B) were analyzed. PE volume was measured based on the drainage volume, and effusions were classified as exudates or transudates according to Light's criteria. Diagnostic performance was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and a linear regression model was developed to predict PE volume.

Results: Exudative PE showed significantly higher baseline intensity parameter B (-35.18 ± 5.17 vs. -41.41 ± 8.64, p < 0.01) and lower peak intensity increment parameter A (1.20 ±  3.27 vs. 6.61 ± 6.10, p < 0.01) compared to transudative PE. The combined parameter A+B (steady-state microbubble concentration index) showed a strong correlation with PE volume (r = 0.912, R 2 = 0.831), yielding the predictive model: V(mL) = -33.345 × (A+B) - 453.071 (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.950). The ROC analysis revealed moderate diagnostic accuracy for the A value (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.779) and B value (AUC = 0.719) in differentiating exudative PE from transudative PE.

Conclusion: Intracavitary CEUS could serve as a reliable, minimally invasive, feasible radiation-free adjunctive technique for quantifying PE volume and differentiating exudative versus transudative PE in patients undergoing thoracentesis. The A+B-based regression model provides high predictive accuracy, while A and B values facilitate effusion classification. This quantitative CEUS workflow may facilitate clinical decision-making, and its utility for serial monitoring requires further verification in large-scale real-world cohorts.

腔内超声造影对胸腔积液的评估:一项初步研究。
目的:为了解决当前成像方式的局限性,本研究旨在开发和验证一种新的腔内对比增强超声(CEUS)方法,用于定量评估胸腔积液(PE)体积和区分渗出性PE和渗出性PE。方法:这项横断面诊断准确性研究前瞻性地纳入了100例PE患者,他们接受了us引导下的胸腔穿刺。采用SonoVue微泡进行腔内超声造影,分析时间-强度曲线参数(A、B、A+B)。根据引流量测量PE体积,并根据Light的标准将积液分类为渗出物或渗出物。通过受试者工作特征(ROC)分析评估诊断效果,并建立线性回归模型预测PE体积。结果:渗出性PE的基线强度参数B(-35.18±5.17 vs -41.41±8.64,p vs. 6.61±6.10,pr = 0.912, r2 = 0.831)明显增高,预测模型为:V(mL) = -33.345 × (A+B) - 453.071(类内相关系数= 0.950)。ROC分析显示,A值(曲线下面积(AUC) = 0.779)和B值(AUC = 0.719)在区分渗出性PE和透出性PE方面具有中等的诊断准确性。结论:腔内超声造影是一种可靠、微创、可行的无辐射辅助技术,可用于定量胸腔镜下胸腔穿刺患者的肺泡容积,鉴别渗出性肺泡与透出性肺泡。基于A+B的回归模型预测精度高,而A和B值有利于积液分类。这种定量的超声造影工作流程可以促进临床决策,其用于串行监测的效用需要在大规模的现实世界队列中进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PeerJ
PeerJ MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
1665
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: PeerJ is an open access peer-reviewed scientific journal covering research in the biological and medical sciences. At PeerJ, authors take out a lifetime publication plan (for as little as $99) which allows them to publish articles in the journal for free, forever. PeerJ has 5 Nobel Prize Winners on the Board; they have won several industry and media awards; and they are widely recognized as being one of the most interesting recent developments in academic publishing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书