Rochan Ramesh, Rohit Mantena, Urvish Jain, Bhav Jain, Anthony Rios, Edward Christopher Dee, Geoffrey Tabin
{"title":"Trends in Location of Death for Individuals with Primary Ocular Cancer in the United States.","authors":"Rochan Ramesh, Rohit Mantena, Urvish Jain, Bhav Jain, Anthony Rios, Edward Christopher Dee, Geoffrey Tabin","doi":"10.1080/09286586.2026.2741242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Individuals with ocular cancer (OC) face unique end-of-life (EOL) challenges, including potential vision loss and poor prognosis. Place of death significantly impacts the quality of EOL care, and most patients express a preference for dying at home. Understanding where patients with OC die is crucial for assessing care quality and equity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants included all 5,196 US decedents from 2003 to 2020 whose underlying cause of death was listed as ocular cancer (ICD-10 codes C69.0-C69.9).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 5,196 decedents with OC, 2,824 (54.3%) died at home, 912 (17.6%) in hospitals, 607 (11.7%) in nursing facilities, 523 (10%) in hospice, and 330 (6.4%) in outpatient or emergency department facilities. Compared to patients aged 64 or younger, patients aged 85 or older were significantly less likely to die in a hospital (OR: 0.32 [95% CI: 0.24-0.43]) and at home (OR: 0.67 [95% CI: 0.56-0.80]), but markedly more likely to die in a nursing facility (OR: 8.30 [95% CI: 6.27-10.99]). Significant racial disparities were found; compared to White patients, Black (OR: 2.75 [95% CI: 1.93-3.90]), Asian (OR: 2.56 [1.57-4.17]), and Hispanic (OR: 1.90 [1.42-2.55]), patients were all significantly more likely to die in a hospital. Black patients were also less likely to die at home (OR: 0.59 [95% CI: 0.42-0.83]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant sociodemographic disparities exist in the location of death for patients with OC, particularly by age and race. Patients from racial and ethnic minority groups are disproportionately more likely to die in hospitals and less likely to die at home, suggesting potential inequities in access to preferred EOL care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19607,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2026.2741242","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Individuals with ocular cancer (OC) face unique end-of-life (EOL) challenges, including potential vision loss and poor prognosis. Place of death significantly impacts the quality of EOL care, and most patients express a preference for dying at home. Understanding where patients with OC die is crucial for assessing care quality and equity.
Methods: Participants included all 5,196 US decedents from 2003 to 2020 whose underlying cause of death was listed as ocular cancer (ICD-10 codes C69.0-C69.9).
Results: Of the 5,196 decedents with OC, 2,824 (54.3%) died at home, 912 (17.6%) in hospitals, 607 (11.7%) in nursing facilities, 523 (10%) in hospice, and 330 (6.4%) in outpatient or emergency department facilities. Compared to patients aged 64 or younger, patients aged 85 or older were significantly less likely to die in a hospital (OR: 0.32 [95% CI: 0.24-0.43]) and at home (OR: 0.67 [95% CI: 0.56-0.80]), but markedly more likely to die in a nursing facility (OR: 8.30 [95% CI: 6.27-10.99]). Significant racial disparities were found; compared to White patients, Black (OR: 2.75 [95% CI: 1.93-3.90]), Asian (OR: 2.56 [1.57-4.17]), and Hispanic (OR: 1.90 [1.42-2.55]), patients were all significantly more likely to die in a hospital. Black patients were also less likely to die at home (OR: 0.59 [95% CI: 0.42-0.83]).
Conclusions: Significant sociodemographic disparities exist in the location of death for patients with OC, particularly by age and race. Patients from racial and ethnic minority groups are disproportionately more likely to die in hospitals and less likely to die at home, suggesting potential inequities in access to preferred EOL care.
期刊介绍:
Ophthalmic Epidemiology is dedicated to the publication of original research into eye and vision health in the fields of epidemiology, public health and the prevention of blindness. Ophthalmic Epidemiology publishes editorials, original research reports, systematic reviews and meta-analysis articles, brief communications and letters to the editor on all subjects related to ophthalmic epidemiology. A broad range of topics is suitable, such as: evaluating the risk of ocular diseases, general and specific study designs, screening program implementation and evaluation, eye health care access, delivery and outcomes, therapeutic efficacy or effectiveness, disease prognosis and quality of life, cost-benefit analysis, biostatistical theory and risk factor analysis. We are looking to expand our engagement with reports of international interest, including those regarding problems affecting developing countries, although reports from all over the world potentially are suitable. Clinical case reports, small case series (not enough for a cohort analysis) articles and animal research reports are not appropriate for this journal.