Equitable Language Access in Neonatal Research.

Q2 Medicine
NeoReviews Pub Date : 2026-10-01 DOI:10.1542/neo.27-10-052
Sydney Green, Cara Boyle, Carl H Backes
{"title":"Equitable Language Access in Neonatal Research.","authors":"Sydney Green, Cara Boyle, Carl H Backes","doi":"10.1542/neo.27-10-052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Participation in neonatal randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is associated with improved or equivalent outcomes for infants and is widely viewed as a cornerstone of high-quality neonatal care. Equitable access to research participation is therefore essential to scientific validity, ethical integrity, and generalizability. Although substantial efforts have focused on improving the representation of racial and ethnic minority groups in neonatal research, the inclusion of families who speak languages other than English remains inadequately examined. In this perspective, we synthesize existing evidence on language-based exclusion in pediatric research and present findings from systematic reviews of neonatal RCT protocols and informed consent materials from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network (1991-2020) and ClinicalTrials.gov (2018-2025). We discuss regulatory, institutional, and structural factors contributing to language exclusion and highlight actionable strategies to promote language-inclusive research, including strengthened federal regulations, investment in equitable language access, language-inclusive study design, systematic documentation of participant language, and meaningful community engagement. Advancing language equity in neonatal research is critical to improving representation, strengthening scientific validity and ensuring that the benefits of research extend to all infants and families.</p>","PeriodicalId":19465,"journal":{"name":"NeoReviews","volume":"27 10","pages":"e604-e610"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeoReviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/neo.27-10-052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Participation in neonatal randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is associated with improved or equivalent outcomes for infants and is widely viewed as a cornerstone of high-quality neonatal care. Equitable access to research participation is therefore essential to scientific validity, ethical integrity, and generalizability. Although substantial efforts have focused on improving the representation of racial and ethnic minority groups in neonatal research, the inclusion of families who speak languages other than English remains inadequately examined. In this perspective, we synthesize existing evidence on language-based exclusion in pediatric research and present findings from systematic reviews of neonatal RCT protocols and informed consent materials from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network (1991-2020) and ClinicalTrials.gov (2018-2025). We discuss regulatory, institutional, and structural factors contributing to language exclusion and highlight actionable strategies to promote language-inclusive research, including strengthened federal regulations, investment in equitable language access, language-inclusive study design, systematic documentation of participant language, and meaningful community engagement. Advancing language equity in neonatal research is critical to improving representation, strengthening scientific validity and ensuring that the benefits of research extend to all infants and families.

新生儿研究中的公平语言获取。
新生儿随机对照试验(RCTs)的参与与婴儿的改善或同等结果相关,被广泛认为是高质量新生儿护理的基石。因此,公平参与研究对科学有效性、道德完整性和普遍性至关重要。尽管在新生儿研究中已经做出了大量的努力,以提高种族和少数民族群体的代表性,但对包括说英语以外语言的家庭的研究仍然不足。从这个角度来看,我们综合了儿科研究中基于语言的排斥的现有证据,并从新生儿随机对照试验方案和知情同意材料的系统综述中得出结论,这些材料来自美国国家儿童健康与人类发展研究所新生儿研究网络(1991-2020)和ClinicalTrials.gov(2018-2025)。我们讨论了导致语言排斥的监管、制度和结构因素,并强调了促进语言包容性研究的可行策略,包括加强联邦法规、投资公平的语言获取、语言包容性研究设计、参与者语言的系统记录和有意义的社区参与。促进新生儿研究中的语言公平对于改善代表性、加强科学有效性和确保研究的益处惠及所有婴儿和家庭至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NeoReviews
NeoReviews Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
110
期刊介绍: Co-edited by Alistair G.S. Philip, MD, FAAP, and William W. Hay Jr., MD, FAAP, NeoReviews each month delivers 3 to 4 clinical reviews, case discussions, basic science insights and "on the horizon" pieces. Written and edited by experts, these concise reviews are available to NeoReviews subscribers at http://neoreviews.aappublications.org. Since January 2009, all clinical articles have been mapped to the American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) content specifications in neonatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书