Surgeons and Experts' Perspectives in Concomitant Bariatric Surgery with Cholecystectomy: Bari-Chole Egypt Survey.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Obesity Surgery Pub Date : 2026-11-01 Epub Date: 2026-10-05 DOI:10.1007/s11695-026-08907-8
Mohamed ElKaseer, Mahmoud ElSafty, Hassan El-Masry, Waleed A Anber, Mohamed S Elgendy, Hamdy Khaled Sabra, Mohammed Ibrahim El Sayed Henish, Mohamed Tolba, Abd-Elfattah Kalmoush, Mahmoud Ashraf Hussein, Ahmed Abo Elmagd, Khaled Gawdat, Ahmed Abokhozima
{"title":"Surgeons and Experts' Perspectives in Concomitant Bariatric Surgery with Cholecystectomy: Bari-Chole Egypt Survey.","authors":"Mohamed ElKaseer, Mahmoud ElSafty, Hassan El-Masry, Waleed A Anber, Mohamed S Elgendy, Hamdy Khaled Sabra, Mohammed Ibrahim El Sayed Henish, Mohamed Tolba, Abd-Elfattah Kalmoush, Mahmoud Ashraf Hussein, Ahmed Abo Elmagd, Khaled Gawdat, Ahmed Abokhozima","doi":"10.1007/s11695-026-08907-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The management of gallbladder disease during metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) remains controversial. Cholelithiasis is common in patients with obesity, yet the approach to concomitant or prophylactic cholecystectomy varies, with limited data from Egypt. This study aimed to assess Egyptian bariatric surgeons' practices, attitudes, and decision-making regarding cholecystectomy during MBS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A national cross-sectional survey was distributed to bariatric surgeons in Egypt, collecting information on demographics, surgical experience, preoperative screening, intraoperative decision-making, postoperative management, and prophylactic practices. The questionnaire included structured, closed-ended questions. Data were analyzed descriptively and compared between IFSO members and non-members using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests, with p < 0.05 considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 117 surgeons participated, predominantly male (99%), with 16.2% IFSO members. Bariatric surgery was concentrated in Cairo (42%) and Alexandria (26%). Most surgeons (97%) screened gallstones preoperatively using abdominal ultrasound. Concomitant cholecystectomy was preferred for documented gallstones by 78%, while 82% never performed prophylactic cholecystectomy in patients with normal gallbladders. The majority performed the bariatric procedure first (82%) in reverse Trendelenburg position (88%), minimizing additional ports. Routine intraoperative cholangiography was rare (1.7%). Postoperative management largely mirrored isolated bariatric surgery, although antibiotic and drain practices differed between groups. Surgeons generally perceived combined procedures as safe, with 76% reporting no increase in complications and 89% reporting similar length of stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Egyptian bariatric surgeons consistently screen for gallstones and favor concomitant cholecystectomy for documented stones, while largely avoiding prophylactic removal of normal gallbladders. Variation exists in intraoperative management and postoperative care. These findings highlight areas for standardization and support the development of a national pathway and multicenter registry to optimize gallbladder management in MBS.</p>","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"5700-5720"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-026-08907-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The management of gallbladder disease during metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) remains controversial. Cholelithiasis is common in patients with obesity, yet the approach to concomitant or prophylactic cholecystectomy varies, with limited data from Egypt. This study aimed to assess Egyptian bariatric surgeons' practices, attitudes, and decision-making regarding cholecystectomy during MBS.

Methods: A national cross-sectional survey was distributed to bariatric surgeons in Egypt, collecting information on demographics, surgical experience, preoperative screening, intraoperative decision-making, postoperative management, and prophylactic practices. The questionnaire included structured, closed-ended questions. Data were analyzed descriptively and compared between IFSO members and non-members using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests, with p < 0.05 considered significant.

Results: A total of 117 surgeons participated, predominantly male (99%), with 16.2% IFSO members. Bariatric surgery was concentrated in Cairo (42%) and Alexandria (26%). Most surgeons (97%) screened gallstones preoperatively using abdominal ultrasound. Concomitant cholecystectomy was preferred for documented gallstones by 78%, while 82% never performed prophylactic cholecystectomy in patients with normal gallbladders. The majority performed the bariatric procedure first (82%) in reverse Trendelenburg position (88%), minimizing additional ports. Routine intraoperative cholangiography was rare (1.7%). Postoperative management largely mirrored isolated bariatric surgery, although antibiotic and drain practices differed between groups. Surgeons generally perceived combined procedures as safe, with 76% reporting no increase in complications and 89% reporting similar length of stay.

Conclusion: Egyptian bariatric surgeons consistently screen for gallstones and favor concomitant cholecystectomy for documented stones, while largely avoiding prophylactic removal of normal gallbladders. Variation exists in intraoperative management and postoperative care. These findings highlight areas for standardization and support the development of a national pathway and multicenter registry to optimize gallbladder management in MBS.

外科医生和专家对胆囊切除术合并减肥手术的看法:Bari-Chole埃及调查。
在代谢和减肥手术(MBS)期间胆囊疾病的管理仍然存在争议。胆石症在肥胖患者中很常见,但伴随或预防性胆囊切除术的方法各不相同,来自埃及的数据有限。本研究旨在评估埃及减肥外科医生在MBS期间对胆囊切除术的做法、态度和决策。方法:对埃及的减肥外科医生进行全国性的横断面调查,收集人口统计学、手术经验、术前筛查、术中决策、术后管理和预防措施等信息。问卷包括结构化的封闭式问题。使用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验对IFSO成员和非成员之间的数据进行描述性分析和比较,p < 0.05为显著性。结果:共有117名外科医生参与,以男性为主(99%),其中16.2%为IFSO成员。减肥手术主要集中在开罗(42%)和亚历山大(26%)。大多数外科医生(97%)术前使用腹部超声筛查胆结石。有记录的胆结石患者中,78%的人倾向于行胆囊切除术,而正常胆囊患者中,82%的人从未行过预防性胆囊切除术。大多数患者首先(82%)在反Trendelenburg体位(88%)进行减肥手术,尽量减少额外的端口。术中常规胆道造影少见(1.7%)。术后处理在很大程度上反映了孤立的减肥手术,尽管抗生素和引流方法在两组之间有所不同。外科医生普遍认为联合手术是安全的,76%的人报告并发症没有增加,89%的人报告住院时间相似。结论:埃及减肥外科医生一贯对胆结石进行筛查,并倾向于对有记录的结石进行胆囊切除术,而在很大程度上避免预防性切除正常胆囊。术中处理和术后护理存在差异。这些发现强调了标准化的领域,并支持国家途径和多中心注册的发展,以优化MBS患者的胆囊管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Obesity Surgery
Obesity Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
24.10%
发文量
567
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Obesity Surgery is the official journal of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and metabolic disorders (IFSO). A journal for bariatric/metabolic surgeons, Obesity Surgery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for communicating the latest research, surgical and laparoscopic techniques, for treatment of massive obesity and metabolic disorders. Topics covered include original research, clinical reports, current status, guidelines, historical notes, invited commentaries, letters to the editor, medicolegal issues, meeting abstracts, modern surgery/technical innovations, new concepts, reviews, scholarly presentations and opinions. Obesity Surgery benefits surgeons performing obesity/metabolic surgery, general surgeons and surgical residents, endoscopists, anesthetists, support staff, nurses, dietitians, psychiatrists, psychologists, plastic surgeons, internists including endocrinologists and diabetologists, nutritional scientists, and those dealing with eating disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书