Maura Seynaeve, Anna C Render, Peter C Fino, Toon de Beukelaar
{"title":"Effects of one night of sleep deprivation on single- and dual-task gait.","authors":"Maura Seynaeve, Anna C Render, Peter C Fino, Toon de Beukelaar","doi":"10.1098/rsif.2026.0047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sleep deprivation (SDEP) impairs cognitive control, which may affect movements that rely on these processes, such as walking. To test whether gait changes after one night of SDEP reflect reduced cognitive capacity, we compared its effects with those of dual-task walking (i.e. walking while performing a simultaneous cognitive task). We hypothesize that SDEP will produce gait changes similar to those under dual-task conditions. Eighteen healthy adults (nine female, nine male; age, mean (s.d.): 22.2 (2.3) years) were tested the morning after a SDEP and a control night. Participants completed two 2-minute trials: single-task walking and walking with a concurrent 2-back working memory task (DT, dual-task walking). Using lateral foot and pelvis marker trajectories, we calculated spatio-temporal parameters, foot placement error in anteroposterior (FPEAP) and mediolateral (FPEML) directions, and mediolateral margin of stability (MoSML). SDEP increased average step time (p < 0.001) and step length (p = 0.002), and DT reduced spatio-temporal variability. Both SDEP (p = 0.004) and DT (p < 0.001) reduced FPEAP, but only DT reduced FPEML (p < 0.001). Additionally, mean MoSML decreased only in SDEP (p = 0.025). Overall, these findings suggest that while SDEP and dual-tasking both affect gait, the effects of SDEP on gait cannot be fully explained by reduced cognitive resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":17488,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Royal Society Interface","volume":"23 243","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13641949/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Royal Society Interface","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2026.0047","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sleep deprivation (SDEP) impairs cognitive control, which may affect movements that rely on these processes, such as walking. To test whether gait changes after one night of SDEP reflect reduced cognitive capacity, we compared its effects with those of dual-task walking (i.e. walking while performing a simultaneous cognitive task). We hypothesize that SDEP will produce gait changes similar to those under dual-task conditions. Eighteen healthy adults (nine female, nine male; age, mean (s.d.): 22.2 (2.3) years) were tested the morning after a SDEP and a control night. Participants completed two 2-minute trials: single-task walking and walking with a concurrent 2-back working memory task (DT, dual-task walking). Using lateral foot and pelvis marker trajectories, we calculated spatio-temporal parameters, foot placement error in anteroposterior (FPEAP) and mediolateral (FPEML) directions, and mediolateral margin of stability (MoSML). SDEP increased average step time (p < 0.001) and step length (p = 0.002), and DT reduced spatio-temporal variability. Both SDEP (p = 0.004) and DT (p < 0.001) reduced FPEAP, but only DT reduced FPEML (p < 0.001). Additionally, mean MoSML decreased only in SDEP (p = 0.025). Overall, these findings suggest that while SDEP and dual-tasking both affect gait, the effects of SDEP on gait cannot be fully explained by reduced cognitive resources.
期刊介绍:
J. R. Soc. Interface welcomes articles of high quality research at the interface of the physical and life sciences. It provides a high-quality forum to publish rapidly and interact across this boundary in two main ways: J. R. Soc. Interface publishes research applying chemistry, engineering, materials science, mathematics and physics to the biological and medical sciences; it also highlights discoveries in the life sciences of relevance to the physical sciences. Both sides of the interface are considered equally and it is one of the only journals to cover this exciting new territory. J. R. Soc. Interface welcomes contributions on a diverse range of topics, including but not limited to; biocomplexity, bioengineering, bioinformatics, biomaterials, biomechanics, bionanoscience, biophysics, chemical biology, computer science (as applied to the life sciences), medical physics, synthetic biology, systems biology, theoretical biology and tissue engineering.