Effects of one night of sleep deprivation on single- and dual-task gait.

IF 3.4 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Maura Seynaeve, Anna C Render, Peter C Fino, Toon de Beukelaar
{"title":"Effects of one night of sleep deprivation on single- and dual-task gait.","authors":"Maura Seynaeve, Anna C Render, Peter C Fino, Toon de Beukelaar","doi":"10.1098/rsif.2026.0047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sleep deprivation (SDEP) impairs cognitive control, which may affect movements that rely on these processes, such as walking. To test whether gait changes after one night of SDEP reflect reduced cognitive capacity, we compared its effects with those of dual-task walking (i.e. walking while performing a simultaneous cognitive task). We hypothesize that SDEP will produce gait changes similar to those under dual-task conditions. Eighteen healthy adults (nine female, nine male; age, mean (s.d.): 22.2 (2.3) years) were tested the morning after a SDEP and a control night. Participants completed two 2-minute trials: single-task walking and walking with a concurrent 2-back working memory task (DT, dual-task walking). Using lateral foot and pelvis marker trajectories, we calculated spatio-temporal parameters, foot placement error in anteroposterior (FPEAP) and mediolateral (FPEML) directions, and mediolateral margin of stability (MoSML). SDEP increased average step time (p < 0.001) and step length (p = 0.002), and DT reduced spatio-temporal variability. Both SDEP (p = 0.004) and DT (p < 0.001) reduced FPEAP, but only DT reduced FPEML (p < 0.001). Additionally, mean MoSML decreased only in SDEP (p = 0.025). Overall, these findings suggest that while SDEP and dual-tasking both affect gait, the effects of SDEP on gait cannot be fully explained by reduced cognitive resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":17488,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Royal Society Interface","volume":"23 243","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13641949/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Royal Society Interface","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2026.0047","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sleep deprivation (SDEP) impairs cognitive control, which may affect movements that rely on these processes, such as walking. To test whether gait changes after one night of SDEP reflect reduced cognitive capacity, we compared its effects with those of dual-task walking (i.e. walking while performing a simultaneous cognitive task). We hypothesize that SDEP will produce gait changes similar to those under dual-task conditions. Eighteen healthy adults (nine female, nine male; age, mean (s.d.): 22.2 (2.3) years) were tested the morning after a SDEP and a control night. Participants completed two 2-minute trials: single-task walking and walking with a concurrent 2-back working memory task (DT, dual-task walking). Using lateral foot and pelvis marker trajectories, we calculated spatio-temporal parameters, foot placement error in anteroposterior (FPEAP) and mediolateral (FPEML) directions, and mediolateral margin of stability (MoSML). SDEP increased average step time (p < 0.001) and step length (p = 0.002), and DT reduced spatio-temporal variability. Both SDEP (p = 0.004) and DT (p < 0.001) reduced FPEAP, but only DT reduced FPEML (p < 0.001). Additionally, mean MoSML decreased only in SDEP (p = 0.025). Overall, these findings suggest that while SDEP and dual-tasking both affect gait, the effects of SDEP on gait cannot be fully explained by reduced cognitive resources.

一晚睡眠剥夺对单任务和双任务步态的影响。
睡眠剥夺(SDEP)会损害认知控制,这可能会影响依赖于这些过程的运动,比如走路。为了测试SDEP一晚后的步态变化是否反映了认知能力的下降,我们将其与双任务步行(即同时进行认知任务的步行)的效果进行了比较。我们假设SDEP会产生类似于双任务条件下的步态变化。18名健康成人(9名女性,9名男性;年龄,平均(s.d): 22.2(2.3)岁)在SDEP后的早晨和对照夜进行了测试。参与者完成了两个2分钟的试验:单任务步行和同时进行双背工作记忆任务(DT,双任务步行)。利用外侧足和骨盆标记轨迹,我们计算了时空参数、足在前后(FPEAP)和中外侧(FPEML)方向的放置误差以及中外侧稳定边缘(MoSML)。SDEP增加了平均步长(p < 0.001)和步长(p = 0.002), DT降低了时空变异性。SDEP (p = 0.004)和DT (p < 0.001)均能降低FPEAP,但只有DT能降低FPEML (p < 0.001)。此外,平均MoSML仅在SDEP中下降(p = 0.025)。总的来说,这些发现表明,虽然SDEP和双重任务都影响步态,但SDEP对步态的影响不能完全用认知资源减少来解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
Journal of The Royal Society Interface 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
234
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: J. R. Soc. Interface welcomes articles of high quality research at the interface of the physical and life sciences. It provides a high-quality forum to publish rapidly and interact across this boundary in two main ways: J. R. Soc. Interface publishes research applying chemistry, engineering, materials science, mathematics and physics to the biological and medical sciences; it also highlights discoveries in the life sciences of relevance to the physical sciences. Both sides of the interface are considered equally and it is one of the only journals to cover this exciting new territory. J. R. Soc. Interface welcomes contributions on a diverse range of topics, including but not limited to; biocomplexity, bioengineering, bioinformatics, biomaterials, biomechanics, bionanoscience, biophysics, chemical biology, computer science (as applied to the life sciences), medical physics, synthetic biology, systems biology, theoretical biology and tissue engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书