Depressive symptom severity and treatment outcome in posttraumatic stress disorder following childhood trauma: A secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Lisanne M Koomen, Mathijs L Deen, Sophie A Rameckers, Christopher W Lee, Eva Fassbinder, Marleen M Rijkeboer, Katrina L Boterhoven de Haan, Arnoud Arntz
{"title":"Depressive symptom severity and treatment outcome in posttraumatic stress disorder following childhood trauma: A secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Lisanne M Koomen, Mathijs L Deen, Sophie A Rameckers, Christopher W Lee, Eva Fassbinder, Marleen M Rijkeboer, Katrina L Boterhoven de Haan, Arnoud Arntz","doi":"10.1002/jts.70129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Depressive symptoms are frequently comorbid with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), yet it remains unclear whether depressive symptom severity before the start of treatment affects the results of trauma-focused psychotherapy. We hypothesized that baseline depressive symptom severity might reduce overall PTSD symptom improvement and could differentially affect treatment response to imagery rescripting (ImRs) versus eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR). This secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial included 150 adults with childhood trauma-related PTSD. Participants received 12 sessions of EMDR or ImRs. Baseline depressive symptoms were assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), and PTSD severity was assessed using the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5). Mixed-effects models were used to examine (a) the effect of baseline depressive symptom severity on PTSD outcomes and (b) its interaction with treatment condition over time. Baseline depressive symptom severity did not significantly predict PTSD outcomes, RR = 1.005, p = .460, and did not moderate the relative effectiveness of EMDR and ImRs, RRs = 0.986-0.999, ps > .202. Both interventions were effective regardless of baseline depression, contrary to our hypotheses, though the findings may be limited by the use of a self-report depressive symptom measure, which may not capture broader clinical features of depression, and a sample limited to adults with childhood trauma-related PTSD. Overall, these findings support trauma-focused treatments irrespective of comorbid depressive symptom severity.</p>","PeriodicalId":17519,"journal":{"name":"Journal of traumatic stress","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of traumatic stress","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.70129","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Depressive symptoms are frequently comorbid with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), yet it remains unclear whether depressive symptom severity before the start of treatment affects the results of trauma-focused psychotherapy. We hypothesized that baseline depressive symptom severity might reduce overall PTSD symptom improvement and could differentially affect treatment response to imagery rescripting (ImRs) versus eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR). This secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial included 150 adults with childhood trauma-related PTSD. Participants received 12 sessions of EMDR or ImRs. Baseline depressive symptoms were assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), and PTSD severity was assessed using the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5). Mixed-effects models were used to examine (a) the effect of baseline depressive symptom severity on PTSD outcomes and (b) its interaction with treatment condition over time. Baseline depressive symptom severity did not significantly predict PTSD outcomes, RR = 1.005, p = .460, and did not moderate the relative effectiveness of EMDR and ImRs, RRs = 0.986-0.999, ps > .202. Both interventions were effective regardless of baseline depression, contrary to our hypotheses, though the findings may be limited by the use of a self-report depressive symptom measure, which may not capture broader clinical features of depression, and a sample limited to adults with childhood trauma-related PTSD. Overall, these findings support trauma-focused treatments irrespective of comorbid depressive symptom severity.

儿童创伤后应激障碍的抑郁症状严重程度和治疗结果:一项随机临床试验的二次分析
抑郁症状通常与创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)并存,但尚不清楚治疗开始前抑郁症状的严重程度是否会影响以创伤为重点的心理治疗的结果。我们假设基线抑郁症状严重程度可能会降低整体PTSD症状的改善,并可能不同地影响意象处方(ImRs)与眼动脱敏和再加工(EMDR)的治疗反应。这是一项随机对照试验的二次分析,包括150名患有童年创伤相关PTSD的成年人。参与者接受了12次EMDR或ImRs。基线抑郁症状采用贝克抑郁量表ii (BDI-II)进行评估,PTSD严重程度采用DSM-5临床应用PTSD量表(CAPS-5)进行评估。使用混合效应模型来检验(a)基线抑郁症状严重程度对PTSD结局的影响,以及(b)其与治疗条件随时间的相互作用。基线抑郁症状严重程度对PTSD预后无显著预测作用(RR = 1.005, p = 0.460),且对EMDR和ImRs的相对疗效无调节作用(RR = 0.986 ~ 0.999, ps = 0.202)。与我们的假设相反,这两种干预措施都是有效的,尽管研究结果可能受到使用自我报告抑郁症状测量的限制,该测量可能无法捕获抑郁症的更广泛临床特征,并且样本仅限于患有儿童期创伤相关PTSD的成年人。总的来说,这些发现支持以创伤为重点的治疗,而不考虑合并症抑郁症状的严重程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.10%
发文量
125
期刊介绍: Journal of Traumatic Stress (JTS) is published for the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. Journal of Traumatic Stress , the official publication for the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, is an interdisciplinary forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers on biopsychosocial aspects of trauma. Papers focus on theoretical formulations, research, treatment, prevention education/training, and legal and policy concerns. Journal of Traumatic Stress serves as a primary reference for professionals who study and treat people exposed to highly stressful and traumatic events (directly or through their occupational roles), such as war, disaster, accident, violence or abuse (criminal or familial), hostage-taking, or life-threatening illness. The journal publishes original articles, brief reports, review papers, commentaries, and, from time to time, special issues devoted to a single topic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书