Lishi Huang, Jin Yu, Dan Gan, Yan Ding, Yeping Yang, Furui Jin
{"title":"Efficacy of Electroacupuncture for Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial.","authors":"Lishi Huang, Jin Yu, Dan Gan, Yan Ding, Yeping Yang, Furui Jin","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S630526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture in the management of chronic pelvic pain (CPP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized, single-blind, sham-controlled trial enrolled 66 women aged 18 to 50 years with CPP. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either electroacupuncture or sham electroacupuncture. Each treatment session lasted 30 minutes and was administered three times weekly, with treatment suspended during menstruation and subsequently resumed until 24 sessions were completed. The primary outcomes were lower abdominal pain and lumbosacral pain assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at baseline, week 8 (end of treatment), and week 16 (8-week follow-up). Secondary outcomes were depression and anxiety assessed using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale HAMD) and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) before and after treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-six women were randomized, with 32 assigned to electroacupuncture and 34 to sham electroacupuncture. At week 8, the reported between-group effect estimates were 3.37 (95% CI, 2.62-4.12) for lower abdominal pain and 3.14 (95% CI, 2.42-3.87) for lumbosacral pain (both <i>p</i> < 0.001). At week 16, the corresponding reported estimates were 3.69 (95% CI, 2.90-4.48) and 3.38 (95% CI, 2.63-4.13), respectively (both <i>p</i> < 0.001), indicating that the reduction in pain was maintained during follow-up. No significant between-group differences were observed in changes in HAMD or HAMA scores after treatment. No serious adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Electroacupuncture may reduce lower abdominal and lumbosacral pain in women with CPP, and the observed reduction was maintained through the 8-week follow-up period. No specific between-group benefit was demonstrated for anxiety or depressive symptoms. Larger studies with longer follow-up are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"19 ","pages":"630526"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13637502/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S630526","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture in the management of chronic pelvic pain (CPP).
Methods: This randomized, single-blind, sham-controlled trial enrolled 66 women aged 18 to 50 years with CPP. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either electroacupuncture or sham electroacupuncture. Each treatment session lasted 30 minutes and was administered three times weekly, with treatment suspended during menstruation and subsequently resumed until 24 sessions were completed. The primary outcomes were lower abdominal pain and lumbosacral pain assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at baseline, week 8 (end of treatment), and week 16 (8-week follow-up). Secondary outcomes were depression and anxiety assessed using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale HAMD) and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) before and after treatment.
Results: Sixty-six women were randomized, with 32 assigned to electroacupuncture and 34 to sham electroacupuncture. At week 8, the reported between-group effect estimates were 3.37 (95% CI, 2.62-4.12) for lower abdominal pain and 3.14 (95% CI, 2.42-3.87) for lumbosacral pain (both p < 0.001). At week 16, the corresponding reported estimates were 3.69 (95% CI, 2.90-4.48) and 3.38 (95% CI, 2.63-4.13), respectively (both p < 0.001), indicating that the reduction in pain was maintained during follow-up. No significant between-group differences were observed in changes in HAMD or HAMA scores after treatment. No serious adverse events were reported.
Conclusion: Electroacupuncture may reduce lower abdominal and lumbosacral pain in women with CPP, and the observed reduction was maintained through the 8-week follow-up period. No specific between-group benefit was demonstrated for anxiety or depressive symptoms. Larger studies with longer follow-up are warranted.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.