Efficacy of Electroacupuncture for Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2026-10-01 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S630526
Lishi Huang, Jin Yu, Dan Gan, Yan Ding, Yeping Yang, Furui Jin
{"title":"Efficacy of Electroacupuncture for Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial.","authors":"Lishi Huang, Jin Yu, Dan Gan, Yan Ding, Yeping Yang, Furui Jin","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S630526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture in the management of chronic pelvic pain (CPP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized, single-blind, sham-controlled trial enrolled 66 women aged 18 to 50 years with CPP. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either electroacupuncture or sham electroacupuncture. Each treatment session lasted 30 minutes and was administered three times weekly, with treatment suspended during menstruation and subsequently resumed until 24 sessions were completed. The primary outcomes were lower abdominal pain and lumbosacral pain assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at baseline, week 8 (end of treatment), and week 16 (8-week follow-up). Secondary outcomes were depression and anxiety assessed using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale HAMD) and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) before and after treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-six women were randomized, with 32 assigned to electroacupuncture and 34 to sham electroacupuncture. At week 8, the reported between-group effect estimates were 3.37 (95% CI, 2.62-4.12) for lower abdominal pain and 3.14 (95% CI, 2.42-3.87) for lumbosacral pain (both <i>p</i> < 0.001). At week 16, the corresponding reported estimates were 3.69 (95% CI, 2.90-4.48) and 3.38 (95% CI, 2.63-4.13), respectively (both <i>p</i> < 0.001), indicating that the reduction in pain was maintained during follow-up. No significant between-group differences were observed in changes in HAMD or HAMA scores after treatment. No serious adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Electroacupuncture may reduce lower abdominal and lumbosacral pain in women with CPP, and the observed reduction was maintained through the 8-week follow-up period. No specific between-group benefit was demonstrated for anxiety or depressive symptoms. Larger studies with longer follow-up are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"19 ","pages":"630526"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13637502/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S630526","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture in the management of chronic pelvic pain (CPP).

Methods: This randomized, single-blind, sham-controlled trial enrolled 66 women aged 18 to 50 years with CPP. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either electroacupuncture or sham electroacupuncture. Each treatment session lasted 30 minutes and was administered three times weekly, with treatment suspended during menstruation and subsequently resumed until 24 sessions were completed. The primary outcomes were lower abdominal pain and lumbosacral pain assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at baseline, week 8 (end of treatment), and week 16 (8-week follow-up). Secondary outcomes were depression and anxiety assessed using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale HAMD) and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) before and after treatment.

Results: Sixty-six women were randomized, with 32 assigned to electroacupuncture and 34 to sham electroacupuncture. At week 8, the reported between-group effect estimates were 3.37 (95% CI, 2.62-4.12) for lower abdominal pain and 3.14 (95% CI, 2.42-3.87) for lumbosacral pain (both p < 0.001). At week 16, the corresponding reported estimates were 3.69 (95% CI, 2.90-4.48) and 3.38 (95% CI, 2.63-4.13), respectively (both p < 0.001), indicating that the reduction in pain was maintained during follow-up. No significant between-group differences were observed in changes in HAMD or HAMA scores after treatment. No serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusion: Electroacupuncture may reduce lower abdominal and lumbosacral pain in women with CPP, and the observed reduction was maintained through the 8-week follow-up period. No specific between-group benefit was demonstrated for anxiety or depressive symptoms. Larger studies with longer follow-up are warranted.

电针治疗慢性盆腔疼痛的疗效:一项随机、单盲、假对照试验。
目的:评价电针治疗慢性盆腔疼痛(CPP)的疗效和安全性。方法:这项随机、单盲、假对照试验招募了66名年龄在18至50岁之间的CPP患者。参与者以1:1的比例随机分配接受电针或假电针。每次治疗持续30分钟,每周进行三次,在月经期间暂停治疗,随后恢复治疗,直到完成24次治疗。在基线、第8周(治疗结束)和第16周(8周随访)时,主要结局是使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估下腹部疼痛和腰骶疼痛。次要结果是治疗前后用汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAMD)和汉密尔顿焦虑评定量表(HAMA)评估抑郁和焦虑。结果:66名妇女随机分组,32名妇女接受电针治疗,34名妇女接受假电针治疗。在第8周,报告的组间效应估计下腹痛为3.37 (95% CI, 2.62-4.12),腰骶痛为3.14 (95% CI, 2.42-3.87)(均p < 0.001)。在第16周,相应的报告估计值分别为3.69 (95% CI, 2.90-4.48)和3.38 (95% CI, 2.63-4.13)(均p < 0.001),表明在随访期间疼痛的减轻得到了维持。治疗后HAMD或HAMA评分的变化在组间无显著差异。无严重不良事件报告。结论:电针可减轻CPP患者下腹部和腰骶部疼痛,并可在8周的随访中保持。在焦虑或抑郁症状方面没有特定的组间益处。更大的研究和更长的随访是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书