Conventional statistical and machine learning-based prediction of neonatal outcomes in late-onset fetal growth restriction.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Bilge Kapudere, Rabia Aydın, Ömer Aydın, Ergül Demirçivi, Reyhan Ayaz, Hanne Bulat Çim, Canan Satır Özel, Abdulkadir Turgut
{"title":"Conventional statistical and machine learning-based prediction of neonatal outcomes in late-onset fetal growth restriction.","authors":"Bilge Kapudere, Rabia Aydın, Ömer Aydın, Ergül Demirçivi, Reyhan Ayaz, Hanne Bulat Çim, Canan Satır Özel, Abdulkadir Turgut","doi":"10.1515/jpm-2026-0344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate associations between antenatal fetal biometric and Doppler parameters and neonatal outcomes in late-onset fetal growth restriction (FGR), and to evaluate machine learning models for neonatal outcome prediction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort included 137 singleton pregnancies. Continuous missing values were completed using a single iterative chained-equations procedure. Maternal characteristics, fetal biometric measurements, and Doppler parameters, including umbilical artery pulsatility index (UA-PI), middle cerebral artery pulsatility index (MCA-PI), and cerebroplacental ratio (CPR), were analyzed. Associations with neonatal outcomes were assessed using conventional statistical methods, multivariable regression analyses, and machine learning models with repeated 5-fold cross-validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NICU admission was associated with higher maternal age and lower gestational age, fetal biometric measurements, estimated fetal weight (EFW), birth weight, Apgar scores, and umbilical cord pH after FDR correction. In the final logistic models, maternal age, previous abortions, and EFW predicted NICU admission; previous cesarean delivery predicted transient tachypnea of the newborn; and maternal age and EFW predicted neonatal sepsis. The birth-weight linear model had the highest explanatory power (adjusted R<sup>2</sup>=0.662). Among machine learning models, birth weight had the best regression performance (cross-validated R<sup>2</sup>=0.592), and neonatal sepsis had the highest classification AUC (0.850).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In late-onset FGR, fetal biometry, Doppler findings, and maternal characteristics were significantly associated with neonatal outcomes. Machine learning models showed moderate predictive performance and confirmed findings from conventional statistical analyses. These findings should be interpreted in light of the retrospective study design and the lack of external validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2026-0344","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate associations between antenatal fetal biometric and Doppler parameters and neonatal outcomes in late-onset fetal growth restriction (FGR), and to evaluate machine learning models for neonatal outcome prediction.

Methods: This retrospective cohort included 137 singleton pregnancies. Continuous missing values were completed using a single iterative chained-equations procedure. Maternal characteristics, fetal biometric measurements, and Doppler parameters, including umbilical artery pulsatility index (UA-PI), middle cerebral artery pulsatility index (MCA-PI), and cerebroplacental ratio (CPR), were analyzed. Associations with neonatal outcomes were assessed using conventional statistical methods, multivariable regression analyses, and machine learning models with repeated 5-fold cross-validation.

Results: NICU admission was associated with higher maternal age and lower gestational age, fetal biometric measurements, estimated fetal weight (EFW), birth weight, Apgar scores, and umbilical cord pH after FDR correction. In the final logistic models, maternal age, previous abortions, and EFW predicted NICU admission; previous cesarean delivery predicted transient tachypnea of the newborn; and maternal age and EFW predicted neonatal sepsis. The birth-weight linear model had the highest explanatory power (adjusted R2=0.662). Among machine learning models, birth weight had the best regression performance (cross-validated R2=0.592), and neonatal sepsis had the highest classification AUC (0.850).

Conclusions: In late-onset FGR, fetal biometry, Doppler findings, and maternal characteristics were significantly associated with neonatal outcomes. Machine learning models showed moderate predictive performance and confirmed findings from conventional statistical analyses. These findings should be interpreted in light of the retrospective study design and the lack of external validation.

基于传统统计和机器学习的迟发性胎儿生长受限新生儿结局预测。
目的:评估迟发性胎儿生长受限(FGR)患者产前胎儿生物特征和多普勒参数与新生儿结局的关系,并评估机器学习模型对新生儿结局的预测。方法:该回顾性队列包括137例单胎妊娠。连续缺失值用单次迭代链方程法完成。分析母体特征、胎儿生物特征测量和多普勒参数,包括脐动脉搏动指数(UA-PI)、大脑中动脉搏动指数(MCA-PI)和脑胎盘比(CPR)。使用常规统计方法、多变量回归分析和重复5倍交叉验证的机器学习模型评估与新生儿结局的关联。结果:新生儿重症监护病房入院与高产妇年龄和低胎龄、胎儿生物特征测量、估计胎儿体重(EFW)、出生体重、Apgar评分和FDR校正后脐带pH值相关。在最后的logistic模型中,产妇年龄、既往流产和EFW预测新生儿重症监护病房入住;既往剖宫产可预测新生儿短暂性呼吸急促;产妇年龄和EFW预测新生儿败血症。出生体重线性模型的解释能力最高(调整后R2=0.662)。在机器学习模型中,出生体重回归性能最好(交叉验证R2=0.592),新生儿脓毒症分类AUC最高(0.850)。结论:在迟发性FGR中,胎儿生物测量、多普勒检查结果和母亲特征与新生儿结局显著相关。机器学习模型显示出适度的预测性能,并证实了传统统计分析的结果。这些发现应根据回顾性研究设计和缺乏外部验证来解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Perinatal Medicine
Journal of Perinatal Medicine 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatal Medicine (JPM) is a truly international forum covering the entire field of perinatal medicine. It is an essential news source for all those obstetricians, neonatologists, perinatologists and allied health professionals who wish to keep abreast of progress in perinatal and related research. Ahead-of-print publishing ensures fastest possible knowledge transfer. The Journal provides statements on themes of topical interest as well as information and different views on controversial topics. It also informs about the academic, organisational and political aims and objectives of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书