Paediatric-Pharmacy Shared Care Improves Access and Efficiency in Developmental Paediatrics.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Jasmine Ucas, Ian Hughes, Danielle J Borg, Olivia Holland, Karyn Reynolds, Angela Owens
{"title":"Paediatric-Pharmacy Shared Care Improves Access and Efficiency in Developmental Paediatrics.","authors":"Jasmine Ucas, Ian Hughes, Danielle J Borg, Olivia Holland, Karyn Reynolds, Angela Owens","doi":"10.1111/jpc.70589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rising prevalence of neurodevelopmental disorders, including attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD), has increased demand for developmental paediatric services. Ongoing medication review requirements place increasing pressure on paediatrician-led models. Pharmacist-led shared care may improve capacity and access; however, evidence in paediatric outpatient settings remains limited.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the impact of a paediatric-pharmacy shared-care model on wait times, service capacity and efficiency compared with medical-only care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a two-phase observational study. Phase 1 retrospectively analysed service activity from 2019 to 2024, including patient numbers, occasions of service, wait times, failure-to-attend rates, and financial outcomes. Phase 2 prospectively audited 100 pharmacist-led consultations to characterise clinical activities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient numbers increased by 87%, and the proportion receiving pharmacist-led shared care rose from 4.1% to 25.3%. Pharmacy clinics had shorter wait times than medical clinics (1.84 vs. 7.64 months; p < 0.001). Following transition to shared care, median medical occasions decreased from 3 to 2 while total occasions increased from 3 to 5 (both p < 0.001). Pharmacy clinics demonstrated greater revenue efficiency (revenue-to-cost ratio 2.97 vs. 1.73). Pharmacists conducted comprehensive medication reviews including medication counselling, adherence assessment, and non-pharmacological support within a supervised framework.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The paediatric-pharmacy shared-care model was associated with shorter wait times, greater cost-efficiency, and redistribution of routine medication reviews to pharmacists, with increased overall review frequency despite fewer medical appointments per patient. Pharmacist reviews were comprehensive and delivered within a supervised framework. These findings support pharmacist-led shared care as a scalable strategy to improve access and workforce capacity in developmental paediatrics.</p>","PeriodicalId":16648,"journal":{"name":"Journal of paediatrics and child health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of paediatrics and child health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.70589","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rising prevalence of neurodevelopmental disorders, including attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD), has increased demand for developmental paediatric services. Ongoing medication review requirements place increasing pressure on paediatrician-led models. Pharmacist-led shared care may improve capacity and access; however, evidence in paediatric outpatient settings remains limited.

Aim: To evaluate the impact of a paediatric-pharmacy shared-care model on wait times, service capacity and efficiency compared with medical-only care.

Methods: We conducted a two-phase observational study. Phase 1 retrospectively analysed service activity from 2019 to 2024, including patient numbers, occasions of service, wait times, failure-to-attend rates, and financial outcomes. Phase 2 prospectively audited 100 pharmacist-led consultations to characterise clinical activities.

Results: Patient numbers increased by 87%, and the proportion receiving pharmacist-led shared care rose from 4.1% to 25.3%. Pharmacy clinics had shorter wait times than medical clinics (1.84 vs. 7.64 months; p < 0.001). Following transition to shared care, median medical occasions decreased from 3 to 2 while total occasions increased from 3 to 5 (both p < 0.001). Pharmacy clinics demonstrated greater revenue efficiency (revenue-to-cost ratio 2.97 vs. 1.73). Pharmacists conducted comprehensive medication reviews including medication counselling, adherence assessment, and non-pharmacological support within a supervised framework.

Conclusion: The paediatric-pharmacy shared-care model was associated with shorter wait times, greater cost-efficiency, and redistribution of routine medication reviews to pharmacists, with increased overall review frequency despite fewer medical appointments per patient. Pharmacist reviews were comprehensive and delivered within a supervised framework. These findings support pharmacist-led shared care as a scalable strategy to improve access and workforce capacity in developmental paediatrics.

儿科药房共享护理提高了发展性儿科的可及性和效率。
背景:神经发育障碍,包括注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)和自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的患病率上升,增加了对发育儿科服务的需求。持续的药物审查要求对儿科医生主导的模式施加了越来越大的压力。药剂师主导的共享医疗可以提高能力和可及性;然而,在儿科门诊的证据仍然有限。目的:评估儿科-药房共享护理模式对等待时间、服务能力和效率的影响。方法:我们进行了两期观察性研究。第一阶段回顾性分析了2019年至2024年的服务活动,包括患者人数、服务场合、等待时间、缺勤率和财务结果。二期预期审计100名药剂师主导的咨询,以描述临床活动。结果:患者人数增加了87%,接受药师主导的共享护理的比例从4.1%上升到25.3%。药房诊所的等待时间比医疗诊所短(1.84个月比7.64个月);p结论:儿科-药房共享护理模式与更短的等待时间、更高的成本效益和常规药物审查重新分配给药剂师相关,尽管每位患者的医疗预约减少,但总体审查频率增加。药剂师审查是全面的,并在监督框架内交付。这些发现支持药剂师主导的共享护理作为一种可扩展的战略,以改善发展性儿科的可及性和劳动力能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
487
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health publishes original research articles of scientific excellence in paediatrics and child health. Research Articles, Case Reports and Letters to the Editor are published, together with invited Reviews, Annotations, Editorial Comments and manuscripts of educational interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书