Health system governance and pharmaceutical policy in Australia and Qatar: a comparative overview of access, reform, and equity.

IF 2.6 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2026-09-30 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20523211.2026.2734138
Dina Abushanab, Daoud Al-Badriyeh
{"title":"Health system governance and pharmaceutical policy in Australia and Qatar: a comparative overview of access, reform, and equity.","authors":"Dina Abushanab, Daoud Al-Badriyeh","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2026.2734138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This commentary contrasts the healthcare systems in Australia and Qatar, emphasising how each nation addresses shifting health policy priorities amid demographic pressures, financing reforms, and pharmaceutical challenges. Australia, with its established Medicare system and institutionalised Health Technology Assessment (HTA), continues to face issues related to equity, rural access, and the demands associated with an aging population. In contrast, Qatar is actively reforming its healthcare infrastructure to support a young and diverse expatriate-majority population, with increasing investments in insurance coverage, HTA integration, and private sector participation. Despite their differing levels of system maturity and population needs, both countries are tackling common issues: the rising burden of non-communicable diseases, cost pressures from innovative treatments, and the necessity of aligning expenditures with measurable health outcomes. The commentary highlights value-based healthcare as a shared goal while critically assessing the impact of pharmaceuticals, data infrastructure, and stakeholder engagement in promoting sustainable and equitable access. By integrating insights and policy reflections within a comparative framework, this commentary identifies opportunities for cross-national learning and outlines potential directions for future research and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"19 1","pages":"2734138"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13629778/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2026.2734138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This commentary contrasts the healthcare systems in Australia and Qatar, emphasising how each nation addresses shifting health policy priorities amid demographic pressures, financing reforms, and pharmaceutical challenges. Australia, with its established Medicare system and institutionalised Health Technology Assessment (HTA), continues to face issues related to equity, rural access, and the demands associated with an aging population. In contrast, Qatar is actively reforming its healthcare infrastructure to support a young and diverse expatriate-majority population, with increasing investments in insurance coverage, HTA integration, and private sector participation. Despite their differing levels of system maturity and population needs, both countries are tackling common issues: the rising burden of non-communicable diseases, cost pressures from innovative treatments, and the necessity of aligning expenditures with measurable health outcomes. The commentary highlights value-based healthcare as a shared goal while critically assessing the impact of pharmaceuticals, data infrastructure, and stakeholder engagement in promoting sustainable and equitable access. By integrating insights and policy reflections within a comparative framework, this commentary identifies opportunities for cross-national learning and outlines potential directions for future research and practice.

澳大利亚和卡塔尔的卫生系统治理和药品政策:获取、改革和公平的比较综述。
这篇评论对比了澳大利亚和卡塔尔的卫生保健系统,强调了每个国家如何在人口压力、融资改革和制药挑战下应对不断变化的卫生政策重点。澳大利亚建立了医疗保险制度和制度化的卫生技术评估(HTA),继续面临与公平、农村获取以及与人口老龄化相关的需求有关的问题。相比之下,卡塔尔正在积极改革其医疗保健基础设施,以支持年轻和多样化的外籍多数人口,增加对保险覆盖、HTA整合和私营部门参与的投资。尽管两国的系统成熟度和人口需求水平不同,但两国正在解决共同的问题:非传染性疾病负担日益加重、创新治疗方法带来的成本压力,以及将支出与可衡量的健康结果相结合的必要性。评论强调以价值为基础的医疗保健是一项共同目标,同时批判性地评估了药品、数据基础设施和利益攸关方参与对促进可持续和公平获取的影响。通过在比较框架内整合见解和政策反思,本评论确定了跨国学习的机会,并概述了未来研究和实践的潜在方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
81
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书