Efficacy and Proposed Mechanisms of Electroacupuncture in Animal Models of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2026-09-29 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S641678
Mingjie Tang, Hang Xu, Shiyi Zheng, Yinghong Li, Tianyi Zhu, Zhongqi Xie, Zhaoming Chen
{"title":"Efficacy and Proposed Mechanisms of Electroacupuncture in Animal Models of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Mingjie Tang, Hang Xu, Shiyi Zheng, Yinghong Li, Tianyi Zhu, Zhongqi Xie, Zhaoming Chen","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S641678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common dose-limiting toxicity of chemotherapy with few effective treatment options. Electroacupuncture (EA) has demonstrated promising clinical efficacy, yet its preclinical evidence remains fragmented, limiting mechanistic understanding and translational application. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of EA in animal models of CIPN and synthesized the underlying mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven databases were systematically searched from inception to June 24, 2026, for controlled animal studies investigating EA for CIPN. The primary outcome was mechanical withdrawal threshold (MWT); secondary outcomes included thermal withdrawal latency (PWL), adhesive removal test (ART) responsive time, sciatic nerve conduction velocity (SNCV), and intra-epidermal nerve fiber density (IENFs). Methodological quality was assessed using SYRCLE, and reporting quality using ARRIVE 2.0. Meta-analyses were conducted by Stata 18.0 and R 4.5.2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>21 studies involving 451 animals were included. SYRCLE scores ranged from 6 to 7, and ARRIVE scores from 9.5 to 15.5, indicating moderate quality. Meta-analysis revealed that EA significantly increased MWT (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 4.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.34 to 5.34, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 78.5%) and PWL (SMD = 5.86, 95% CI: 3.97 to 7.75, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 78.2%) compared to model group. EA also significantly shortened ART responsive time (SMD = -3.76, 95% CI: -6.69 to -0.83, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 88.0%), improved SNCV (SMD = 5.56, 95% CI: 4.10 to 7.02, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%) and preserved IENFs (SMD = 3.39, 95% CI: 2.34 to 4.45, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%). Mechanistically, EA attenuated neuroinflammation, modulated ion channels, activated antioxidant pathways, and regulated neurotransmitter release.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preclinical evidence demonstrates that EA effectively alleviates pain-like behaviors, improves sensory recovery, and enhances neurological function in CIPN models through multi-target mechanisms. These findings support EA as a promising intervention warranting further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"19 ","pages":"641678"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13635300/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S641678","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common dose-limiting toxicity of chemotherapy with few effective treatment options. Electroacupuncture (EA) has demonstrated promising clinical efficacy, yet its preclinical evidence remains fragmented, limiting mechanistic understanding and translational application. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of EA in animal models of CIPN and synthesized the underlying mechanisms.

Methods: Seven databases were systematically searched from inception to June 24, 2026, for controlled animal studies investigating EA for CIPN. The primary outcome was mechanical withdrawal threshold (MWT); secondary outcomes included thermal withdrawal latency (PWL), adhesive removal test (ART) responsive time, sciatic nerve conduction velocity (SNCV), and intra-epidermal nerve fiber density (IENFs). Methodological quality was assessed using SYRCLE, and reporting quality using ARRIVE 2.0. Meta-analyses were conducted by Stata 18.0 and R 4.5.2.

Results: 21 studies involving 451 animals were included. SYRCLE scores ranged from 6 to 7, and ARRIVE scores from 9.5 to 15.5, indicating moderate quality. Meta-analysis revealed that EA significantly increased MWT (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 4.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.34 to 5.34, I 2 = 78.5%) and PWL (SMD = 5.86, 95% CI: 3.97 to 7.75, I 2 = 78.2%) compared to model group. EA also significantly shortened ART responsive time (SMD = -3.76, 95% CI: -6.69 to -0.83, I 2 = 88.0%), improved SNCV (SMD = 5.56, 95% CI: 4.10 to 7.02, I 2 = 0%) and preserved IENFs (SMD = 3.39, 95% CI: 2.34 to 4.45, I 2 = 0%). Mechanistically, EA attenuated neuroinflammation, modulated ion channels, activated antioxidant pathways, and regulated neurotransmitter release.

Conclusion: Preclinical evidence demonstrates that EA effectively alleviates pain-like behaviors, improves sensory recovery, and enhances neurological function in CIPN models through multi-target mechanisms. These findings support EA as a promising intervention warranting further research.

电针在化疗诱导的周围神经病变动物模型中的疗效和可能的机制:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:化疗引起的周围神经病变(CIPN)是一种常见的剂量限制性化疗毒性,很少有有效的治疗选择。电针(EA)已显示出良好的临床疗效,但其临床前证据仍然不完整,限制了机制的理解和转化应用。本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了EA在CIPN动物模型中的疗效,并综合了其潜在机制。方法:系统检索7个数据库,从建立到2026年6月24日,用于调查EA对CIPN的对照动物研究。主要终点为机械戒断阈值(MWT);次要结果包括热停药潜伏期(PWL)、黏附去除试验(ART)反应时间、坐骨神经传导速度(SNCV)和表皮内神经纤维密度(IENFs)。方法学质量采用sycle评估,报告质量采用ARRIVE 2.0。meta分析采用Stata 18.0和R 4.5.2进行。结果:共纳入21项研究,涉及451只动物。sycle评分在6 - 7分之间,arrival评分在9.5 - 15.5分之间,属于中等质量。meta分析显示,与模型组相比,EA显著提高了MWT(标准化平均差[SMD] = 4.34, 95%可信区间[CI]: 3.34 ~ 5.34, i2 = 78.5%)和PWL (SMD = 5.86, 95% CI: 3.97 ~ 7.75, i2 = 78.2%)。EA还显著缩短了ART反应时间(SMD = -3.76, 95% CI: -6.69至-0.83,I 2 = 88.0%),改善了SNCV (SMD = 5.56, 95% CI: 4.10至7.02,I 2 = 0%),保存了IENFs (SMD = 3.39, 95% CI: 2.34至4.45,I 2 = 0%)。从机制上讲,EA减轻了神经炎症,调节了离子通道,激活了抗氧化途径,调节了神经递质释放。结论:临床前证据表明,EA可通过多靶点机制有效缓解CIPN模型的疼痛样行为,促进感觉恢复,增强神经功能。这些发现支持EA作为一种有希望的干预措施,值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书