Efficacy and Proposed Mechanisms of Electroacupuncture in Animal Models of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
{"title":"Efficacy and Proposed Mechanisms of Electroacupuncture in Animal Models of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Mingjie Tang, Hang Xu, Shiyi Zheng, Yinghong Li, Tianyi Zhu, Zhongqi Xie, Zhaoming Chen","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S641678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common dose-limiting toxicity of chemotherapy with few effective treatment options. Electroacupuncture (EA) has demonstrated promising clinical efficacy, yet its preclinical evidence remains fragmented, limiting mechanistic understanding and translational application. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of EA in animal models of CIPN and synthesized the underlying mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven databases were systematically searched from inception to June 24, 2026, for controlled animal studies investigating EA for CIPN. The primary outcome was mechanical withdrawal threshold (MWT); secondary outcomes included thermal withdrawal latency (PWL), adhesive removal test (ART) responsive time, sciatic nerve conduction velocity (SNCV), and intra-epidermal nerve fiber density (IENFs). Methodological quality was assessed using SYRCLE, and reporting quality using ARRIVE 2.0. Meta-analyses were conducted by Stata 18.0 and R 4.5.2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>21 studies involving 451 animals were included. SYRCLE scores ranged from 6 to 7, and ARRIVE scores from 9.5 to 15.5, indicating moderate quality. Meta-analysis revealed that EA significantly increased MWT (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 4.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.34 to 5.34, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 78.5%) and PWL (SMD = 5.86, 95% CI: 3.97 to 7.75, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 78.2%) compared to model group. EA also significantly shortened ART responsive time (SMD = -3.76, 95% CI: -6.69 to -0.83, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 88.0%), improved SNCV (SMD = 5.56, 95% CI: 4.10 to 7.02, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%) and preserved IENFs (SMD = 3.39, 95% CI: 2.34 to 4.45, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%). Mechanistically, EA attenuated neuroinflammation, modulated ion channels, activated antioxidant pathways, and regulated neurotransmitter release.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preclinical evidence demonstrates that EA effectively alleviates pain-like behaviors, improves sensory recovery, and enhances neurological function in CIPN models through multi-target mechanisms. These findings support EA as a promising intervention warranting further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"19 ","pages":"641678"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13635300/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S641678","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common dose-limiting toxicity of chemotherapy with few effective treatment options. Electroacupuncture (EA) has demonstrated promising clinical efficacy, yet its preclinical evidence remains fragmented, limiting mechanistic understanding and translational application. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of EA in animal models of CIPN and synthesized the underlying mechanisms.
Methods: Seven databases were systematically searched from inception to June 24, 2026, for controlled animal studies investigating EA for CIPN. The primary outcome was mechanical withdrawal threshold (MWT); secondary outcomes included thermal withdrawal latency (PWL), adhesive removal test (ART) responsive time, sciatic nerve conduction velocity (SNCV), and intra-epidermal nerve fiber density (IENFs). Methodological quality was assessed using SYRCLE, and reporting quality using ARRIVE 2.0. Meta-analyses were conducted by Stata 18.0 and R 4.5.2.
Results: 21 studies involving 451 animals were included. SYRCLE scores ranged from 6 to 7, and ARRIVE scores from 9.5 to 15.5, indicating moderate quality. Meta-analysis revealed that EA significantly increased MWT (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 4.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.34 to 5.34, I2 = 78.5%) and PWL (SMD = 5.86, 95% CI: 3.97 to 7.75, I2 = 78.2%) compared to model group. EA also significantly shortened ART responsive time (SMD = -3.76, 95% CI: -6.69 to -0.83, I2 = 88.0%), improved SNCV (SMD = 5.56, 95% CI: 4.10 to 7.02, I2 = 0%) and preserved IENFs (SMD = 3.39, 95% CI: 2.34 to 4.45, I2 = 0%). Mechanistically, EA attenuated neuroinflammation, modulated ion channels, activated antioxidant pathways, and regulated neurotransmitter release.
Conclusion: Preclinical evidence demonstrates that EA effectively alleviates pain-like behaviors, improves sensory recovery, and enhances neurological function in CIPN models through multi-target mechanisms. These findings support EA as a promising intervention warranting further research.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.