Office-hours versus off-hours deliveries among low-risk singleton pregnancies in Türkiye and early maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes: A retrospective cohort study.

IF 1 Q2 Medicine
Deniz Akyıldız, Betül Bay
{"title":"Office-hours versus off-hours deliveries among low-risk singleton pregnancies in Türkiye and early maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Deniz Akyıldız, Betül Bay","doi":"10.1177/19345798261475325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe timing of birth may influence the quality and safety of obstetric care due to differences in staffing, workload, and clinical support. This study examined the association between office-hours and off-hours deliveries and early maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study was conducted at a maternity hospital in Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye. Deliveries occurring between January 1, 2022, and January 1, 2023 were reviewed retrospectively. Births were classified as office-hours (08:00-15:59, Monday-Friday) or off-hours (16:00-07:59 on weekdays and all hours on weekends). Maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between the groups using appropriate statistical tests, and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.ResultsA total of 1000 mother-newborn dyads were included, with 500 births occurring during office-hours and 500 during off-hours. Off-hours deliveries were associated with higher odds of intrapartum cesarean section (OR 2.27; 95% CI 1.02-5.04; <i>p</i> = 0.038) and episiotomy (OR 2.19; 95% CI 1.57-3.04; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Birth trauma was significantly less likely among births occurring during office-hours than among those occurring during off-hours (OR 0.28; 95% CI 0.09-0.85; <i>p</i> = 0.029). No significant differences were observed between the groups in postpartum haemorrhage, need for blood transfusion, or maternal death. Similarly, neonatal outcomes including low Apgar score at 5 min, respiratory distress, need for resuscitation, and admission to neonatal care did not differ significantly between the groups.ConclusionsBirths occurring during off-hours were associated with higher rates of intrapartum cesarean section, episiotomy, and birth trauma. These findings highlight the importance of ensuring consistent quality of obstetric care across all hours of service.</p>","PeriodicalId":16537,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine","volume":" ","pages":"19345798261475325"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19345798261475325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundThe timing of birth may influence the quality and safety of obstetric care due to differences in staffing, workload, and clinical support. This study examined the association between office-hours and off-hours deliveries and early maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study was conducted at a maternity hospital in Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye. Deliveries occurring between January 1, 2022, and January 1, 2023 were reviewed retrospectively. Births were classified as office-hours (08:00-15:59, Monday-Friday) or off-hours (16:00-07:59 on weekdays and all hours on weekends). Maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between the groups using appropriate statistical tests, and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.ResultsA total of 1000 mother-newborn dyads were included, with 500 births occurring during office-hours and 500 during off-hours. Off-hours deliveries were associated with higher odds of intrapartum cesarean section (OR 2.27; 95% CI 1.02-5.04; p = 0.038) and episiotomy (OR 2.19; 95% CI 1.57-3.04; p < 0.001). Birth trauma was significantly less likely among births occurring during office-hours than among those occurring during off-hours (OR 0.28; 95% CI 0.09-0.85; p = 0.029). No significant differences were observed between the groups in postpartum haemorrhage, need for blood transfusion, or maternal death. Similarly, neonatal outcomes including low Apgar score at 5 min, respiratory distress, need for resuscitation, and admission to neonatal care did not differ significantly between the groups.ConclusionsBirths occurring during off-hours were associated with higher rates of intrapartum cesarean section, episiotomy, and birth trauma. These findings highlight the importance of ensuring consistent quality of obstetric care across all hours of service.

在 rkiye低风险单胎妊娠和早期孕产妇和新生儿不良后果中,办公时间与非工作时间分娩:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:由于人员配置、工作量和临床支持的差异,分娩时间可能会影响产科护理的质量和安全性。本研究调查了办公时间和非工作时间分娩与早期孕产妇和新生儿不良后果之间的关系。方法回顾性队列研究在哈萨克斯坦kahramanmaraku的一家妇产医院进行。对2022年1月1日至2023年1月1日之间的交付进行了回顾性审查。分娩时间分为上班时间(周一至周五08:00-15:59)和下班时间(工作日16:00-07:59,周末全天)。使用适当的统计检验比较两组之间的孕产妇和新生儿结局,并计算95%置信区间(ci)的优势比(ORs)。结果共纳入1000对母婴,其中上班时间分娩500例,下班时间分娩500例。非工作时间分娩与产时剖宫产(OR 2.27; 95% CI 1.02-5.04; p = 0.038)和会阴切开术(OR 2.19; 95% CI 1.57-3.04; p < 0.001)的几率较高相关。在办公时间分娩的分娩创伤明显低于非工作时间分娩的分娩创伤(OR 0.28; 95% CI 0.09-0.85; p = 0.029)。两组之间在产后出血、需要输血或产妇死亡方面没有显著差异。同样,新生儿结局包括5分钟低Apgar评分、呼吸窘迫、需要复苏和入院新生儿护理在两组之间没有显著差异。结论非工作时间分娩与产时剖宫产、会阴切开术和分娩创伤发生率增高有关。这些调查结果强调了在所有服务时间内确保始终如一的产科护理质量的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine
Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
124
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书