Bruno Carvalho de Sousa, Fabio Luiz Cunha D'Assunção, Celso Luiz Caldeira, Hugo Victor Dantas, Frederico Barbosa de Sousa
{"title":"Planning Protocol for Apical Preparation Maximizing Root Canal Wall Instrumentation and Preserving Root Dentin Structural Integrity.","authors":"Bruno Carvalho de Sousa, Fabio Luiz Cunha D'Assunção, Celso Luiz Caldeira, Hugo Victor Dantas, Frederico Barbosa de Sousa","doi":"10.1016/j.joen.2026.09.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study developed a personalized root canal instrumentation planning protocol designed to minimize uninstrumented canal walls while preserving a remaining dentin thickness (RDT) of at least 0.5 mm and compared it with the best available planning protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred maxillary lateral incisors were scanned by microcomputed tomography, and 400 cross-sections were analyzed at 1, 2, 3, and 4 mm from the apical foramen. Canal diameters, aspect ratio, and minimum RDT were measured. Virtual preparation was planned using 5 nickel titanium systems (ProTaper Ultimate, Reciproc Blue, SRF Sequence MKLife, HyFlex EDM, and WaveOne Gold) individually and a new hybrid protocol allowing instruments from multiple systems and hand K-files when necessary. The primary outcomes were uninstrumented canal surfaces and an RDT <0.5 mm. Paired risk ratios, exact McNemar tests, and Bayes factors were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean canal taper was 0.08 mm/mm, and the mean aspect ratio was 1.40 ± 0.59. Among single-system protocols, ProTaper Ultimate produced the lowest frequency of uninstrumented surfaces (215/400; 53.8%). The new protocol reduced this frequency to 52 of 400 (13.0%), corresponding to a 76% reduction versus ProTaper Ultimate (risk ratio of 4.13; 95% confidence interval, 3.20-5.34; P < .001). The hybrid protocol was also the only strategy with no sections presenting RDT <0.5 mm (0/400), whereas single-system protocols ranged from 1.8% to 4.5%. The protocol significantly outperformed every tested single-system strategy for both primary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The new personalized hybrid instrumentation planning substantially reduced uninstrumented canal surfaces while preventing critical dentin thinning compared with existing customized single-system protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":15703,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endodontics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2026.09.013","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: This study developed a personalized root canal instrumentation planning protocol designed to minimize uninstrumented canal walls while preserving a remaining dentin thickness (RDT) of at least 0.5 mm and compared it with the best available planning protocol.
Methods: One hundred maxillary lateral incisors were scanned by microcomputed tomography, and 400 cross-sections were analyzed at 1, 2, 3, and 4 mm from the apical foramen. Canal diameters, aspect ratio, and minimum RDT were measured. Virtual preparation was planned using 5 nickel titanium systems (ProTaper Ultimate, Reciproc Blue, SRF Sequence MKLife, HyFlex EDM, and WaveOne Gold) individually and a new hybrid protocol allowing instruments from multiple systems and hand K-files when necessary. The primary outcomes were uninstrumented canal surfaces and an RDT <0.5 mm. Paired risk ratios, exact McNemar tests, and Bayes factors were calculated.
Results: The mean canal taper was 0.08 mm/mm, and the mean aspect ratio was 1.40 ± 0.59. Among single-system protocols, ProTaper Ultimate produced the lowest frequency of uninstrumented surfaces (215/400; 53.8%). The new protocol reduced this frequency to 52 of 400 (13.0%), corresponding to a 76% reduction versus ProTaper Ultimate (risk ratio of 4.13; 95% confidence interval, 3.20-5.34; P < .001). The hybrid protocol was also the only strategy with no sections presenting RDT <0.5 mm (0/400), whereas single-system protocols ranged from 1.8% to 4.5%. The protocol significantly outperformed every tested single-system strategy for both primary outcomes.
Conclusions: The new personalized hybrid instrumentation planning substantially reduced uninstrumented canal surfaces while preventing critical dentin thinning compared with existing customized single-system protocols.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Endodontics, the official journal of the American Association of Endodontists, publishes scientific articles, case reports and comparison studies evaluating materials and methods of pulp conservation and endodontic treatment. Endodontists and general dentists can learn about new concepts in root canal treatment and the latest advances in techniques and instrumentation in the one journal that helps them keep pace with rapid changes in this field.