Planning Protocol for Apical Preparation Maximizing Root Canal Wall Instrumentation and Preserving Root Dentin Structural Integrity.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Bruno Carvalho de Sousa, Fabio Luiz Cunha D'Assunção, Celso Luiz Caldeira, Hugo Victor Dantas, Frederico Barbosa de Sousa
{"title":"Planning Protocol for Apical Preparation Maximizing Root Canal Wall Instrumentation and Preserving Root Dentin Structural Integrity.","authors":"Bruno Carvalho de Sousa, Fabio Luiz Cunha D'Assunção, Celso Luiz Caldeira, Hugo Victor Dantas, Frederico Barbosa de Sousa","doi":"10.1016/j.joen.2026.09.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study developed a personalized root canal instrumentation planning protocol designed to minimize uninstrumented canal walls while preserving a remaining dentin thickness (RDT) of at least 0.5 mm and compared it with the best available planning protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred maxillary lateral incisors were scanned by microcomputed tomography, and 400 cross-sections were analyzed at 1, 2, 3, and 4 mm from the apical foramen. Canal diameters, aspect ratio, and minimum RDT were measured. Virtual preparation was planned using 5 nickel titanium systems (ProTaper Ultimate, Reciproc Blue, SRF Sequence MKLife, HyFlex EDM, and WaveOne Gold) individually and a new hybrid protocol allowing instruments from multiple systems and hand K-files when necessary. The primary outcomes were uninstrumented canal surfaces and an RDT <0.5 mm. Paired risk ratios, exact McNemar tests, and Bayes factors were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean canal taper was 0.08 mm/mm, and the mean aspect ratio was 1.40 ± 0.59. Among single-system protocols, ProTaper Ultimate produced the lowest frequency of uninstrumented surfaces (215/400; 53.8%). The new protocol reduced this frequency to 52 of 400 (13.0%), corresponding to a 76% reduction versus ProTaper Ultimate (risk ratio of 4.13; 95% confidence interval, 3.20-5.34; P < .001). The hybrid protocol was also the only strategy with no sections presenting RDT <0.5 mm (0/400), whereas single-system protocols ranged from 1.8% to 4.5%. The protocol significantly outperformed every tested single-system strategy for both primary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The new personalized hybrid instrumentation planning substantially reduced uninstrumented canal surfaces while preventing critical dentin thinning compared with existing customized single-system protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":15703,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endodontics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2026.09.013","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study developed a personalized root canal instrumentation planning protocol designed to minimize uninstrumented canal walls while preserving a remaining dentin thickness (RDT) of at least 0.5 mm and compared it with the best available planning protocol.

Methods: One hundred maxillary lateral incisors were scanned by microcomputed tomography, and 400 cross-sections were analyzed at 1, 2, 3, and 4 mm from the apical foramen. Canal diameters, aspect ratio, and minimum RDT were measured. Virtual preparation was planned using 5 nickel titanium systems (ProTaper Ultimate, Reciproc Blue, SRF Sequence MKLife, HyFlex EDM, and WaveOne Gold) individually and a new hybrid protocol allowing instruments from multiple systems and hand K-files when necessary. The primary outcomes were uninstrumented canal surfaces and an RDT <0.5 mm. Paired risk ratios, exact McNemar tests, and Bayes factors were calculated.

Results: The mean canal taper was 0.08 mm/mm, and the mean aspect ratio was 1.40 ± 0.59. Among single-system protocols, ProTaper Ultimate produced the lowest frequency of uninstrumented surfaces (215/400; 53.8%). The new protocol reduced this frequency to 52 of 400 (13.0%), corresponding to a 76% reduction versus ProTaper Ultimate (risk ratio of 4.13; 95% confidence interval, 3.20-5.34; P < .001). The hybrid protocol was also the only strategy with no sections presenting RDT <0.5 mm (0/400), whereas single-system protocols ranged from 1.8% to 4.5%. The protocol significantly outperformed every tested single-system strategy for both primary outcomes.

Conclusions: The new personalized hybrid instrumentation planning substantially reduced uninstrumented canal surfaces while preventing critical dentin thinning compared with existing customized single-system protocols.

规划根尖准备方案,最大化根管管壁内固定和保持根本质结构完整性。
本研究开发了一种个性化的根管预备计划方案,旨在最大限度地减少未预备根管壁,同时保留至少0.5 mm的剩余牙本质厚度(RDT),并将其与现有的最佳计划方案进行比较。方法:对100个上颌侧切牙进行显微ct扫描,并在距根尖孔1、2、3、4 mm处对400个切面进行分析。测量管径、纵横比和最小RDT。虚拟准备分别使用5种NiTi系统(ProTaper Ultimate、Reciproc Blue、SRF Sequence MKLife、HyFlex EDM和WaveOne Gold)和一种新的混合协议,允许来自多个系统的仪器和必要时的手动k文件。结果:平均根管锥度为0.08 mm/mm,平均长径比为1.40±0.59。在单系统方案中,ProTaper Ultimate产生的未检测表面的频率最低(215/400,53.8%)。新方案将这一频率降低到52/400(13.0%),与ProTaper Ultimate相比降低了76% (RR为4.13;95% CI为3.20-5.34;p)。结论:与现有的定制单系统方案相比,新的个性化混合器械计划大大减少了未器械管面,同时防止了关键的牙本质变细。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of endodontics
Journal of endodontics 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
224
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endodontics, the official journal of the American Association of Endodontists, publishes scientific articles, case reports and comparison studies evaluating materials and methods of pulp conservation and endodontic treatment. Endodontists and general dentists can learn about new concepts in root canal treatment and the latest advances in techniques and instrumentation in the one journal that helps them keep pace with rapid changes in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书