Measuring uptake of the 2024 national standards for survivorship care: Insights from National Cancer Institute funded pilot projects.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Sara A Flores, Michelle Doose, Rachelle Brick, Sallie J Weaver
{"title":"Measuring uptake of the 2024 national standards for survivorship care: Insights from National Cancer Institute funded pilot projects.","authors":"Sara A Flores, Michelle Doose, Rachelle Brick, Sallie J Weaver","doi":"10.1007/s11764-026-02130-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Measuring alignment with clinical program standards is essential for strengthening cancer survivorship care yet remains challenging due to the range and duration of services involved. The 2024 National Standards for Survivorship Care provide aspirational recommendations across three domains-policy, processes, and evaluation/assessment-for health systems developing survivorship care. Following their release, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) funded 18 supplements to understand alignment of existing services and programs with the standards and identify implementation barriers and facilitators. This report synthesizes measurement tools and approaches used in the supplements to evaluate alignment with the standards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Trained abstractors used a standardized codebook to extract project-level and measure-level characteristics, including the specific national standards assessed, data types, data collection methods, and respondent characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen of 18 supplement projects contributed 91 measurement tools (surveys, interview protocols, environmental scan protocols, EHR/administrative variables). Most addressed the health system process standards (82.4%), while health system policy (31.9%) and evaluation/assessment standards were less represented (15.4%). Existence or occurrence of care elements was most commonly assessed (72.5%); less commonly captured was the quality or degree to which a standard was met or how care processes occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings identify opportunities to improve how alignment with national standards is measured, including the need for shared operational definitions for each standard that are applicable across cancer care delivery settings and support consistent measurement.</p><p><strong>Implications for cancer survivors: </strong>Stronger measurement infrastructure helps healthcare systems identify gaps in survivorship care, supporting comprehensive care for a growing cancer survivor population.</p>","PeriodicalId":15284,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-026-02130-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Measuring alignment with clinical program standards is essential for strengthening cancer survivorship care yet remains challenging due to the range and duration of services involved. The 2024 National Standards for Survivorship Care provide aspirational recommendations across three domains-policy, processes, and evaluation/assessment-for health systems developing survivorship care. Following their release, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) funded 18 supplements to understand alignment of existing services and programs with the standards and identify implementation barriers and facilitators. This report synthesizes measurement tools and approaches used in the supplements to evaluate alignment with the standards.

Methods: Trained abstractors used a standardized codebook to extract project-level and measure-level characteristics, including the specific national standards assessed, data types, data collection methods, and respondent characteristics.

Results: Fourteen of 18 supplement projects contributed 91 measurement tools (surveys, interview protocols, environmental scan protocols, EHR/administrative variables). Most addressed the health system process standards (82.4%), while health system policy (31.9%) and evaluation/assessment standards were less represented (15.4%). Existence or occurrence of care elements was most commonly assessed (72.5%); less commonly captured was the quality or degree to which a standard was met or how care processes occurred.

Conclusions: These findings identify opportunities to improve how alignment with national standards is measured, including the need for shared operational definitions for each standard that are applicable across cancer care delivery settings and support consistent measurement.

Implications for cancer survivors: Stronger measurement infrastructure helps healthcare systems identify gaps in survivorship care, supporting comprehensive care for a growing cancer survivor population.

衡量2024年国家生存护理标准的吸收:来自国家癌症研究所资助试点项目的见解。
目的:衡量与临床项目标准的一致性对于加强癌症生存护理至关重要,但由于所涉及的服务范围和持续时间仍然具有挑战性。2024年国家生存护理标准为发展生存护理的卫生系统提供了政策、流程和评估/评估三个领域的理想建议。在这些标准发布后,美国国家癌症研究所(NCI)资助了18个补充项目,以了解现有服务和项目与标准的一致性,并确定实施障碍和促进因素。本报告综合了补品中用于评估是否符合标准的测量工具和方法。方法:训练有素的抽象人员使用标准化代码本提取项目级和度量级特征,包括评估的具体国家标准、数据类型、数据收集方法和被调查者特征。结果:18个补充项目中的14个提供了91个测量工具(调查、访谈协议、环境扫描协议、EHR/行政变量)。大多数涉及卫生系统过程标准(82.4%),而卫生系统政策(31.9%)和评价/评估标准较少(15.4%)。最常被评估的是护理因素的存在或发生(72.5%);较少被捕获的是达到标准的质量或程度,或者护理过程是如何发生的。结论:这些发现确定了改进与国家标准一致性测量的机会,包括需要为适用于癌症护理提供环境的每个标准提供共享的操作定义,并支持一致的测量。对癌症幸存者的影响:更强大的测量基础设施有助于医疗保健系统识别幸存者护理方面的差距,支持对不断增长的癌症幸存者群体的全面护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
10.80%
发文量
149
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer survivorship is a worldwide concern. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to provide a global forum for new knowledge related to cancer survivorship. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers relevant to improving the understanding, prevention, and management of the multiple areas related to cancer survivorship that can affect quality of care, access to care, longevity, and quality of life. It is a forum for research on humans (both laboratory and clinical), clinical studies, systematic and meta-analytic literature reviews, policy studies, and in rare situations case studies as long as they provide a new observation that should be followed up on to improve outcomes related to cancer survivors. Published articles represent a broad range of fields including oncology, primary care, physical medicine and rehabilitation, many other medical and nursing specialties, nursing, health services research, physical and occupational therapy, public health, behavioral medicine, psychology, social work, evidence-based policy, health economics, biobehavioral mechanisms, and qualitative analyses. The journal focuses exclusively on adult cancer survivors, young adult cancer survivors, and childhood cancer survivors who are young adults. Submissions must target those diagnosed with and treated for cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书