Sara A Flores, Michelle Doose, Rachelle Brick, Sallie J Weaver
{"title":"Measuring uptake of the 2024 national standards for survivorship care: Insights from National Cancer Institute funded pilot projects.","authors":"Sara A Flores, Michelle Doose, Rachelle Brick, Sallie J Weaver","doi":"10.1007/s11764-026-02130-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Measuring alignment with clinical program standards is essential for strengthening cancer survivorship care yet remains challenging due to the range and duration of services involved. The 2024 National Standards for Survivorship Care provide aspirational recommendations across three domains-policy, processes, and evaluation/assessment-for health systems developing survivorship care. Following their release, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) funded 18 supplements to understand alignment of existing services and programs with the standards and identify implementation barriers and facilitators. This report synthesizes measurement tools and approaches used in the supplements to evaluate alignment with the standards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Trained abstractors used a standardized codebook to extract project-level and measure-level characteristics, including the specific national standards assessed, data types, data collection methods, and respondent characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen of 18 supplement projects contributed 91 measurement tools (surveys, interview protocols, environmental scan protocols, EHR/administrative variables). Most addressed the health system process standards (82.4%), while health system policy (31.9%) and evaluation/assessment standards were less represented (15.4%). Existence or occurrence of care elements was most commonly assessed (72.5%); less commonly captured was the quality or degree to which a standard was met or how care processes occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings identify opportunities to improve how alignment with national standards is measured, including the need for shared operational definitions for each standard that are applicable across cancer care delivery settings and support consistent measurement.</p><p><strong>Implications for cancer survivors: </strong>Stronger measurement infrastructure helps healthcare systems identify gaps in survivorship care, supporting comprehensive care for a growing cancer survivor population.</p>","PeriodicalId":15284,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-026-02130-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Measuring alignment with clinical program standards is essential for strengthening cancer survivorship care yet remains challenging due to the range and duration of services involved. The 2024 National Standards for Survivorship Care provide aspirational recommendations across three domains-policy, processes, and evaluation/assessment-for health systems developing survivorship care. Following their release, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) funded 18 supplements to understand alignment of existing services and programs with the standards and identify implementation barriers and facilitators. This report synthesizes measurement tools and approaches used in the supplements to evaluate alignment with the standards.
Methods: Trained abstractors used a standardized codebook to extract project-level and measure-level characteristics, including the specific national standards assessed, data types, data collection methods, and respondent characteristics.
Results: Fourteen of 18 supplement projects contributed 91 measurement tools (surveys, interview protocols, environmental scan protocols, EHR/administrative variables). Most addressed the health system process standards (82.4%), while health system policy (31.9%) and evaluation/assessment standards were less represented (15.4%). Existence or occurrence of care elements was most commonly assessed (72.5%); less commonly captured was the quality or degree to which a standard was met or how care processes occurred.
Conclusions: These findings identify opportunities to improve how alignment with national standards is measured, including the need for shared operational definitions for each standard that are applicable across cancer care delivery settings and support consistent measurement.
Implications for cancer survivors: Stronger measurement infrastructure helps healthcare systems identify gaps in survivorship care, supporting comprehensive care for a growing cancer survivor population.
期刊介绍:
Cancer survivorship is a worldwide concern. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to provide a global forum for new knowledge related to cancer survivorship. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers relevant to improving the understanding, prevention, and management of the multiple areas related to cancer survivorship that can affect quality of care, access to care, longevity, and quality of life. It is a forum for research on humans (both laboratory and clinical), clinical studies, systematic and meta-analytic literature reviews, policy studies, and in rare situations case studies as long as they provide a new observation that should be followed up on to improve outcomes related to cancer survivors. Published articles represent a broad range of fields including oncology, primary care, physical medicine and rehabilitation, many other medical and nursing specialties, nursing, health services research, physical and occupational therapy, public health, behavioral medicine, psychology, social work, evidence-based policy, health economics, biobehavioral mechanisms, and qualitative analyses. The journal focuses exclusively on adult cancer survivors, young adult cancer survivors, and childhood cancer survivors who are young adults. Submissions must target those diagnosed with and treated for cancer.