Adrian D Haimovich, Annie Lacourciere, Kerry Palihnich, Sydney Mulqueen, Natalie Jansen, Suzanne M Bertisch, Mara A Schonberg, Aanand D Naik, Sarah D Berry, Edward R Marcantonio, Nathan I Shapiro, Janet M Mullington
{"title":"Feasibility and Acceptability of Oura Ring Sleep Monitoring in Older Adults Admitted From the Emergency Department: Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Adrian D Haimovich, Annie Lacourciere, Kerry Palihnich, Sydney Mulqueen, Natalie Jansen, Suzanne M Bertisch, Mara A Schonberg, Aanand D Naik, Sarah D Berry, Edward R Marcantonio, Nathan I Shapiro, Janet M Mullington","doi":"10.2196/92359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency department (ED) boarding exposes admitted older adults to a high-disruption environment. Sleep loss during acute hospitalization is associated with adverse outcomes and may contribute to delirium, yet objective sleep measurement in this setting is difficult. Consumer multisensor wearables may permit low-burden, longitudinal measurement, but the feasibility and acceptability of ring-based monitoring among acutely ill older adults is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to estimate the feasibility and acceptability of Oura Ring Gen 3 sleep monitoring in older adults admitted to the hospital from the ED, and to describe exploratory device-measured and patient-reported sleep outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-site prospective cohort study from February through March 2025. Patients aged 65 years or older with an inpatient medical bed request were recruited in the ED and asked to wear the ring continuously for up to 4 days or until discharge; monitoring continued after transfer to an inpatient unit from the ED. Participants underwent daily 3-Minute Diagnostic Interview for Confusion Assessment Method-Defined Delirium (3D-CAM) assessments, cognitive testing when not delirious, daily sleep surveys, and an exit survey. Feasibility outcomes were the approached-to-enrolled proportion and the proportion of study completers with wear for more than 75% of the analyzed period. Acceptability was the proportion of exit respondents who disagreed or strongly disagreed that the ring bothered them. Device-estimated sleep duration was normalized to hours per 24 hours, and its association with mean patient-reported sleep quality was assessed using Kendall τ.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 29 patients approached for consent, 15 enrolled (51.7%, 95% CI 32.5%-70.6%); 1 withdrew immediately, leaving 14 who completed study procedures. Of these 14 patients, 13 wore the ring for ≥75% of their enrollment period (92.9%, 95% CI 66.1%-99.8%). Eleven participants completed the exit survey, and 9 reported that the ring was not bothersome (81.8%, 95% CI 48.2%-97.7%). Among the 13 participants who wore the ring for ≥75% of the analyzed period, median device-estimated sleep was 4.3 (IQR 2.6-7.0) hours per 24 hours. Participants reported good or very good sleep on 9 of 19 surveyed nights (47.4%). Mean sleep quality and device-estimated sleep duration were positively associated among 10 participants with complete paired data (Kendall τ=0.54; <i>P</i>=.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this pilot study, we found that sleep monitoring with the Oura Ring Gen 3 was feasible and acceptable to older adults admitted from the ED. These findings support larger studies validating the Oura Ring against polysomnography in hospitalized older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"10 ","pages":"e92359"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13626187/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Formative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/92359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Emergency department (ED) boarding exposes admitted older adults to a high-disruption environment. Sleep loss during acute hospitalization is associated with adverse outcomes and may contribute to delirium, yet objective sleep measurement in this setting is difficult. Consumer multisensor wearables may permit low-burden, longitudinal measurement, but the feasibility and acceptability of ring-based monitoring among acutely ill older adults is unknown.
Objective: This study aimed to estimate the feasibility and acceptability of Oura Ring Gen 3 sleep monitoring in older adults admitted to the hospital from the ED, and to describe exploratory device-measured and patient-reported sleep outcomes.
Methods: We conducted a single-site prospective cohort study from February through March 2025. Patients aged 65 years or older with an inpatient medical bed request were recruited in the ED and asked to wear the ring continuously for up to 4 days or until discharge; monitoring continued after transfer to an inpatient unit from the ED. Participants underwent daily 3-Minute Diagnostic Interview for Confusion Assessment Method-Defined Delirium (3D-CAM) assessments, cognitive testing when not delirious, daily sleep surveys, and an exit survey. Feasibility outcomes were the approached-to-enrolled proportion and the proportion of study completers with wear for more than 75% of the analyzed period. Acceptability was the proportion of exit respondents who disagreed or strongly disagreed that the ring bothered them. Device-estimated sleep duration was normalized to hours per 24 hours, and its association with mean patient-reported sleep quality was assessed using Kendall τ.
Results: Of 29 patients approached for consent, 15 enrolled (51.7%, 95% CI 32.5%-70.6%); 1 withdrew immediately, leaving 14 who completed study procedures. Of these 14 patients, 13 wore the ring for ≥75% of their enrollment period (92.9%, 95% CI 66.1%-99.8%). Eleven participants completed the exit survey, and 9 reported that the ring was not bothersome (81.8%, 95% CI 48.2%-97.7%). Among the 13 participants who wore the ring for ≥75% of the analyzed period, median device-estimated sleep was 4.3 (IQR 2.6-7.0) hours per 24 hours. Participants reported good or very good sleep on 9 of 19 surveyed nights (47.4%). Mean sleep quality and device-estimated sleep duration were positively associated among 10 participants with complete paired data (Kendall τ=0.54; P=.04).
Conclusions: In this pilot study, we found that sleep monitoring with the Oura Ring Gen 3 was feasible and acceptable to older adults admitted from the ED. These findings support larger studies validating the Oura Ring against polysomnography in hospitalized older adults.
背景:急诊科(ED)登机使入院的老年人暴露在一个高度混乱的环境中。急性住院期间睡眠不足与不良后果相关,并可能导致谵妄,但在这种情况下,客观的睡眠测量是困难的。消费类多传感器可穿戴设备可能允许低负担的纵向测量,但在急病老年人中进行基于环的监测的可行性和可接受性尚不清楚。目的:本研究旨在评估从急诊科入院的老年人Oura Ring Gen 3睡眠监测的可行性和可接受性,并描述探索性设备测量和患者报告的睡眠结果。方法:我们于2025年2月至3月进行了一项单点前瞻性队列研究。在急诊科招募65岁或以上的住院病人,并要求他们连续佩戴戒指4天或直到出院;从急诊科转到住院部后继续监测。参与者每天接受3分钟的诊断访谈,以评估混乱评估方法定义的谵妄(3D-CAM)评估,非谵妄时的认知测试,每日睡眠调查和出院调查。可行性结果是接近入组比例和研究完成者在分析期间磨损超过75%的比例。可接受度是指不同意或强烈不同意戒指困扰他们的受访者的比例。将设备估计的睡眠持续时间归一化为每24小时数小时,并使用Kendall τ评估其与患者报告的平均睡眠质量的关联。结果:在29例征求同意的患者中,15例入组(51.7%,95% CI 32.5%-70.6%);1人立即退出,剩下14人完成了研究程序。在这14名患者中,13名患者在≥75%的入组时间内戴环(92.9%,95% CI 66.1%-99.8%)。11名参与者完成了退出调查,9人报告戒指不麻烦(81.8%,95% CI 48.2%-97.7%)。在13名戴环时间≥75%的参与者中,设备估计的平均睡眠时间为每24小时4.3小时(IQR 2.6-7.0)。在接受调查的19个晚上中,参与者报告有9个晚上睡眠良好或非常好(47.4%)。在10名具有完整配对数据的参与者中,平均睡眠质量和设备估计睡眠时间呈正相关(Kendall τ=0.54; P= 0.04)。结论:在这项初步研究中,我们发现用Oura环Gen 3进行睡眠监测对急诊科入院的老年人是可行的,也是可以接受的。这些发现支持了更大规模的研究,验证了Oura环对住院老年人的多导睡眠描记术的有效性。