Factors associated with successful initiation of labor analgesia using the dural puncture epidural technique: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Ayaka Kuwabata, Jun Takeshita, Kazuya Tachibana
{"title":"Factors associated with successful initiation of labor analgesia using the dural puncture epidural technique: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Ayaka Kuwabata, Jun Takeshita, Kazuya Tachibana","doi":"10.1007/s00540-026-03918-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The dural puncture epidural (DPE) technique has been proposed as a modification of conventional epidural analgesia that may influence onset and block quality. However, factors associated with successful initiation of labor analgesia using the DPE technique remain unclear. We aimed to identify predictors for successful initiation of labor analgesia using the DPE technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included parturients who received DPE for initiation of labor analgesia between April 2022 and March 2025. Success was defined as a composite outcome of epidural catheter placement within 15 min from initial skin puncture with the epidural needle and a numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score ≤ 3 recorded between 30 and 60 min after the first epidural bolus. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of success.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 1037 parturients included in the analysis, success was achieved in 693 cases, whereas 344 were classified as failures. In the multivariable analysis, operator experience (per 10 procedures) (odds ratio 1.10, 95% confidence interval 1.04 to 1.15, P < 0.001), baseline NRS (P < 0.001), cervical dilation at initiation (P = 0.038), maternal age (P = 0.013), and spinal disorder (P = 0.034) were identified as independent predictors of success.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Operator experience was independently associated with successful initiation of labor analgesia using the DPE technique and was the only factor associated with both procedural success and early analgesic effectiveness. Operator- and patient-related factors should be considered when predicting the likelihood of successful initiation of labor analgesia using the DPE technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":14997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-026-03918-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The dural puncture epidural (DPE) technique has been proposed as a modification of conventional epidural analgesia that may influence onset and block quality. However, factors associated with successful initiation of labor analgesia using the DPE technique remain unclear. We aimed to identify predictors for successful initiation of labor analgesia using the DPE technique.

Methods: This retrospective study included parturients who received DPE for initiation of labor analgesia between April 2022 and March 2025. Success was defined as a composite outcome of epidural catheter placement within 15 min from initial skin puncture with the epidural needle and a numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score ≤ 3 recorded between 30 and 60 min after the first epidural bolus. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of success.

Results: Among the 1037 parturients included in the analysis, success was achieved in 693 cases, whereas 344 were classified as failures. In the multivariable analysis, operator experience (per 10 procedures) (odds ratio 1.10, 95% confidence interval 1.04 to 1.15, P < 0.001), baseline NRS (P < 0.001), cervical dilation at initiation (P = 0.038), maternal age (P = 0.013), and spinal disorder (P = 0.034) were identified as independent predictors of success.

Conclusion: Operator experience was independently associated with successful initiation of labor analgesia using the DPE technique and was the only factor associated with both procedural success and early analgesic effectiveness. Operator- and patient-related factors should be considered when predicting the likelihood of successful initiation of labor analgesia using the DPE technique.

使用硬膜穿刺硬膜外技术成功启动分娩镇痛的相关因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
目的:硬膜穿刺硬膜外(DPE)技术已被提出作为一种改进的传统硬膜外镇痛,可能会影响起效和阻滞质量。然而,与使用DPE技术成功启动分娩镇痛相关的因素仍不清楚。我们的目的是确定使用DPE技术成功启动分娩镇痛的预测因素。方法:本回顾性研究纳入了2022年4月至2025年3月期间接受DPE启动分娩镇痛的产妇。成功的定义是在硬膜外针首次皮肤穿刺后15分钟内放置硬膜外导管,并在第一次硬膜外注射后30至60分钟内记录数值评定量表(NRS)疼痛评分≤3的综合结果。采用多变量逻辑回归来确定成功的独立预测因素。结果:纳入分析的1037例产妇中,成功693例,失败344例。在多变量分析中,操作者经验(每10次手术)(优势比1.10,95%可信区间1.04至1.15,P < 0.001)、基线NRS (P < 0.001)、开始时宫颈扩张(P = 0.038)、产妇年龄(P = 0.013)和脊柱疾病(P = 0.034)被确定为成功的独立预测因素。结论:操作人员经验与使用DPE技术成功启动分娩镇痛独立相关,并且是与手术成功和早期镇痛效果相关的唯一因素。在预测使用DPE技术成功启动分娩镇痛的可能性时,应考虑操作人员和患者相关因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Anesthesia
Journal of Anesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
112
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anesthesia is the official journal of the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists. This journal publishes original articles, review articles, special articles, clinical reports, short communications, letters to the editor, and book and multimedia reviews. The editors welcome the submission of manuscripts devoted to anesthesia and related topics from any country of the world. Membership in the Society is not a prerequisite. The Journal of Anesthesia (JA) welcomes case reports that show unique cases in perioperative medicine, intensive care, emergency medicine, and pain management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书