The effect of beta-blockers in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and atrial fibrillation: systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Shahrukh Mohammed, Khubaib Mohammad Murtafa, Rohit Vondivillu Srinivasan, Hasindu Avishka Arumapperuma, Arjun Anilkumar, Mennaalla Osman, Sadiya Sajad Khanday, Muhammad Rahim Arshad, Abdul Shafi
{"title":"The effect of beta-blockers in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and atrial fibrillation: systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Shahrukh Mohammed, Khubaib Mohammad Murtafa, Rohit Vondivillu Srinivasan, Hasindu Avishka Arumapperuma, Arjun Anilkumar, Mennaalla Osman, Sadiya Sajad Khanday, Muhammad Rahim Arshad, Abdul Shafi","doi":"10.1007/s11845-026-04619-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently coexist and together confer a substantially elevated risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Despite the widespread clinical use of beta-blockers for rate control in this population, their prognostic impact remains unresolved, with existing evidence derived predominantly from observational cohorts subject to confounding by indication.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the association of beta-blocker therapy with all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, heart failure hospitalization, and composite outcomes in patients with coexisting HFpEF and AF through a systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Online databases (MEDLINE and Scopus) were searched from inception through March 2026 for studies reporting on the effects of beta-blockers in patients with HFpEF and AF. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model. Heterogeneity was quantified using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic. Leave-one-out sensitivity analyses and pre-specified subgroup analyses by study design and follow-up duration were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies were included (n = 31,888; beta-blocker group n = 24,683; control n = 7,205). Beta-blocker therapy was associated with a statistically significant reduction in all-cause mortality (HR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.83-0.93; P < 0.0001; I<sup>2</sup> = 44.9%) and cardiovascular mortality (HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.84-0.99; P = 0.023; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). No statistically significant differences were observed for heart failure hospitalization (HR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.70-1.10; P = 0.264; I<sup>2</sup> = 62.5%) or the composite outcome (HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.77-1.02; P = 0.084; I<sup>2</sup> = 70.7%). In leave-one-out analyses, exclusion of Yang 2020 yielded statistically significant reductions in both all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization with elimination or reduction of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with HFpEF and concomitant AF, beta-blocker therapy is associated with significant reductions in all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. No significant benefit was observed for heart failure hospitalization or composite outcomes in primary analyses, though sensitivity analyses were supportive. These findings, derived from observational data, support a permissive clinical approach to beta-blocker use in this population, particularly for rate control in those with elevated heart rates. Adequately powered randomized controlled trials specifically targeting HFpEF with AF are urgently needed to establish causal efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14507,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-026-04619-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently coexist and together confer a substantially elevated risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Despite the widespread clinical use of beta-blockers for rate control in this population, their prognostic impact remains unresolved, with existing evidence derived predominantly from observational cohorts subject to confounding by indication.

Aims: To evaluate the association of beta-blocker therapy with all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, heart failure hospitalization, and composite outcomes in patients with coexisting HFpEF and AF through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods: Online databases (MEDLINE and Scopus) were searched from inception through March 2026 for studies reporting on the effects of beta-blockers in patients with HFpEF and AF. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model. Heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 statistic. Leave-one-out sensitivity analyses and pre-specified subgroup analyses by study design and follow-up duration were performed.

Results: Nine studies were included (n = 31,888; beta-blocker group n = 24,683; control n = 7,205). Beta-blocker therapy was associated with a statistically significant reduction in all-cause mortality (HR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.83-0.93; P < 0.0001; I2 = 44.9%) and cardiovascular mortality (HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.84-0.99; P = 0.023; I2 = 0%). No statistically significant differences were observed for heart failure hospitalization (HR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.70-1.10; P = 0.264; I2 = 62.5%) or the composite outcome (HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.77-1.02; P = 0.084; I2 = 70.7%). In leave-one-out analyses, exclusion of Yang 2020 yielded statistically significant reductions in both all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization with elimination or reduction of heterogeneity.

Conclusions: In patients with HFpEF and concomitant AF, beta-blocker therapy is associated with significant reductions in all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. No significant benefit was observed for heart failure hospitalization or composite outcomes in primary analyses, though sensitivity analyses were supportive. These findings, derived from observational data, support a permissive clinical approach to beta-blocker use in this population, particularly for rate control in those with elevated heart rates. Adequately powered randomized controlled trials specifically targeting HFpEF with AF are urgently needed to establish causal efficacy.

-受体阻滞剂在保留射血分数和心房颤动的心力衰竭中的作用:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:心力衰竭伴保留射血分数(HFpEF)和心房颤动(AF)经常共存,并共同导致心血管不良结局的风险显著升高。尽管临床上广泛使用β受体阻滞剂来控制该人群的发病率,但其预后影响仍未得到解决,现有证据主要来自观察性队列,容易因适应症而混淆。目的:通过系统回顾和荟萃分析,评估受体阻滞剂治疗与HFpEF和房颤共存患者的全因死亡率、心血管死亡率、心力衰竭住院率和综合结局的关系。方法:检索在线数据库(MEDLINE和Scopus),从成立到2026年3月,检索报道β受体阻滞剂对HFpEF和AF患者影响的研究。使用DerSimonian和Laird随机效应模型汇总95%置信区间(ci)的风险比(hr)。异质性采用I2统计量进行量化。通过研究设计和随访时间进行留一敏感性分析和预先指定的亚组分析。结果:纳入9项研究(n = 31,888;受体阻滞剂组n = 24,683;对照组n = 7,205)。β受体阻滞剂治疗与全因死亡率(HR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.83-0.93; P 2 = 44.9%)和心血管死亡率(HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.84-0.99; P = 0.023; I2 = 0%)的降低有统计学意义。心力衰竭住院治疗(HR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.70-1.10; P = 0.264; I2 = 62.5%)或综合结局(HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.77-1.02; P = 0.084; I2 = 70.7%)无统计学差异。在“留一”分析中,排除Yang 2020后,全因死亡率和心力衰竭住院率均有统计学显著降低,异质性消除或降低。结论:在HFpEF合并房颤的患者中,受体阻滞剂治疗与全因死亡率和心血管死亡率的显著降低相关。在初步分析中没有观察到心力衰竭住院治疗或综合结果的显著益处,尽管敏感性分析是支持的。这些来自观察性数据的发现,支持在这一人群中使用β受体阻滞剂的许可临床方法,特别是对心率升高的人群进行心率控制。迫切需要针对HFpEF合并AF的充分有力的随机对照试验来确定因果效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Irish Journal of Medical Science
Irish Journal of Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Irish Journal of Medical Science is the official organ of the Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland. Established in 1832, this quarterly journal is a contribution to medical science and an ideal forum for the younger medical/scientific professional to enter world literature and an ideal launching platform now, as in the past, for many a young research worker. The primary role of both the Academy and IJMS is that of providing a forum for the exchange of scientific information and to promote academic discussion, so essential to scientific progress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书