Small Bowel Obstruction Following Laparoscopic Sacrocervicopexy Involving Barbed Sutures: Case Report and Focused Review.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Tsunagu Ichikawa, Edward Marici
{"title":"Small Bowel Obstruction Following Laparoscopic Sacrocervicopexy Involving Barbed Sutures: Case Report and Focused Review.","authors":"Tsunagu Ichikawa, Edward Marici","doi":"10.1007/s00192-026-06879-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>Barbed sutures are increasingly used in minimally invasive pelvic reconstructive surgery but have been associated with rare postoperative complications. We present a case of delayed small bowel obstruction (SBO) due to barbed-suture entrapment after laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy, and review the current literature to characterize the presentation, mechanisms, and management of this complication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the clinical course, imaging, operative findings, and outcomes of a patient who developed SBO following manual laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy. A focused literature review was performed using PubMed to identify reported cases of barbed-suture-related SBO following laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy or sacrocolpopexy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patient presented with characteristic symptoms of bowel obstruction. CT imaging revealed early SBO with a transition point in the anterior pelvis. Diagnostic laparoscopy identified distal small bowel mesentery entrapped beneath a barbed suture from the prior sacrocervicopexy. Simple removal of the entrapping suture resolved the obstruction without need for bowel resection. A literature review identified five reported cases of SBO secondary to barbed-suture use in sacrocervicopexy/sacrocolpopexy procedures. In the limited published cases, most patients were successfully managed laparoscopically.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Small bowel obstruction secondary to barbed-suture entrapment is a rare but serious complication following sacrocervicopexy/sacrocolpopexy. Early recognition and prompt laparoscopic intervention are often associated with successful management without bowel compromise. Surgeons should employ a meticulous technique when using barbed sutures, including proper tail management and complete peritoneal coverage. Future efforts should be aimed at reducing this complication by way of materials innovation and clinical guideline development.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-026-06879-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: Barbed sutures are increasingly used in minimally invasive pelvic reconstructive surgery but have been associated with rare postoperative complications. We present a case of delayed small bowel obstruction (SBO) due to barbed-suture entrapment after laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy, and review the current literature to characterize the presentation, mechanisms, and management of this complication.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical course, imaging, operative findings, and outcomes of a patient who developed SBO following manual laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy. A focused literature review was performed using PubMed to identify reported cases of barbed-suture-related SBO following laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy or sacrocolpopexy.

Results: The patient presented with characteristic symptoms of bowel obstruction. CT imaging revealed early SBO with a transition point in the anterior pelvis. Diagnostic laparoscopy identified distal small bowel mesentery entrapped beneath a barbed suture from the prior sacrocervicopexy. Simple removal of the entrapping suture resolved the obstruction without need for bowel resection. A literature review identified five reported cases of SBO secondary to barbed-suture use in sacrocervicopexy/sacrocolpopexy procedures. In the limited published cases, most patients were successfully managed laparoscopically.

Conclusions: Small bowel obstruction secondary to barbed-suture entrapment is a rare but serious complication following sacrocervicopexy/sacrocolpopexy. Early recognition and prompt laparoscopic intervention are often associated with successful management without bowel compromise. Surgeons should employ a meticulous technique when using barbed sutures, including proper tail management and complete peritoneal coverage. Future efforts should be aimed at reducing this complication by way of materials innovation and clinical guideline development.

腹腔镜骶颈切除术后小肠梗阻:病例报告和重点回顾。
引言和假设:倒钩缝线越来越多地用于微创盆腔重建手术,但其术后并发症罕见。我们报告一例腹腔镜骶颈切除术后因带刺缝线夹持而导致的延迟性小肠梗阻(SBO),并回顾目前的文献来描述这种并发症的表现、机制和处理。方法:我们回顾性回顾了一例手工腹腔镜骶颈切除术后发生SBO的患者的临床过程、影像学、手术表现和结果。利用PubMed进行了一项重点文献综述,以确定腹腔镜骶颈固定术或骶骶固定术后发生的与刺针缝合相关的SBO病例。结果:患者表现出肠梗阻的特征性症状。CT表现为早期SBO,骨盆前部有一个过渡点。诊断性腹腔镜检查发现远端小肠肠系膜夹在先前骶颈固定术的刺状缝合线下。简单的去除包埋缝线解决了梗阻,无需肠切除术。一篇文献综述确定了在骶颈固定术/骶髋固定术中使用带刺缝线继发SBO的5例报告病例。在有限发表的病例中,大多数患者成功地进行了腹腔镜治疗。结论:骶颈固定术/骶colpop固定术后继发小肠梗阻是一种罕见但严重的并发症。早期识别和及时的腹腔镜干预通常与成功的治疗有关,而不会损害肠道。外科医生在使用倒钩缝合线时应采用细致的技术,包括适当的尾部处理和完全的腹膜覆盖。未来的努力应旨在通过材料创新和临床指南的发展来减少这种并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书