Comparison of the effect of connective tissue massage and foam roller in fibromyalgia patients.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Muhammet Sahin Elbasti, Songul Baglan Yentur
{"title":"Comparison of the effect of connective tissue massage and foam roller in fibromyalgia patients.","authors":"Muhammet Sahin Elbasti, Songul Baglan Yentur","doi":"10.1007/s11845-026-04636-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of foam roller (FR) and connective tissue massage (CTM) in pain, function, sleep quality, and quality of life in patients with Fibromyalgia Syndrome (FMS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty female participants with FMS were randomly assigned to CTM group or Foam Roller (FR) group. Both interventions were applied twice in a week for 6 weeks. The Michigan Body Map (MBM), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) were used to evaluate pain localization, pain, quality of life, sleep quality and function, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All measurements demonstrated significant post-treatment improvements in both groups (p < 0.001). Comparisons between groups showed that CTM led to more improvements in pain localization (p < 0.001) and function (p = 0.033). Between-group comparisons revealed that the CTM group achieved greater improvements in functional status (p < 0.001), fibromyalgia impact (p = 0.005), and pain localization (p < 0.001) compared with the FR group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study was concluded the improvement of all assesments both in CTM and FR groups. In addition, CTM demonstrated greater advantages in terms of functional independence and pain management, indicating that it might be a better treatment choice for fibromyalgia symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":14507,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-026-04636-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of foam roller (FR) and connective tissue massage (CTM) in pain, function, sleep quality, and quality of life in patients with Fibromyalgia Syndrome (FMS).

Methods: Forty female participants with FMS were randomly assigned to CTM group or Foam Roller (FR) group. Both interventions were applied twice in a week for 6 weeks. The Michigan Body Map (MBM), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) were used to evaluate pain localization, pain, quality of life, sleep quality and function, respectively.

Results: All measurements demonstrated significant post-treatment improvements in both groups (p < 0.001). Comparisons between groups showed that CTM led to more improvements in pain localization (p < 0.001) and function (p = 0.033). Between-group comparisons revealed that the CTM group achieved greater improvements in functional status (p < 0.001), fibromyalgia impact (p = 0.005), and pain localization (p < 0.001) compared with the FR group.

Conclusion: This study was concluded the improvement of all assesments both in CTM and FR groups. In addition, CTM demonstrated greater advantages in terms of functional independence and pain management, indicating that it might be a better treatment choice for fibromyalgia symptoms.

结缔组织按摩与泡沫滚轮治疗纤维肌痛疗效比较。
目的:比较泡沫滚轮(FR)和结缔组织按摩(CTM)对纤维肌痛综合征(FMS)患者疼痛、功能、睡眠质量和生活质量的影响。方法:40例女性FMS患者随机分为CTM组和泡沫滚轮组。两种干预措施每周应用2次,持续6周。采用密歇根身体图(MBM)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)、健康评估问卷(HAQ)、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)和纤维肌痛影响问卷(FIQ)分别评估疼痛定位、疼痛、生活质量、睡眠质量和功能。结果:两组治疗后各项指标均有显著改善(p)。结论:本研究得出CTM组和FR组的各项指标均有改善。此外,CTM在功能独立性和疼痛管理方面表现出更大的优势,表明它可能是纤维肌痛症状的更好治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Irish Journal of Medical Science
Irish Journal of Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Irish Journal of Medical Science is the official organ of the Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland. Established in 1832, this quarterly journal is a contribution to medical science and an ideal forum for the younger medical/scientific professional to enter world literature and an ideal launching platform now, as in the past, for many a young research worker. The primary role of both the Academy and IJMS is that of providing a forum for the exchange of scientific information and to promote academic discussion, so essential to scientific progress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书