Racial Disparities in the Management of Myeloma Bone Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 5.5 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Ruxandra M Irimia, Valentina Goularte, Metodi Balev, Michael Singel, Dan Skoloda, Philip H Imus, Carol Ann Huff, S Abbas Ali, Hua-Ling Tsai, Christian B Gocke
{"title":"Racial Disparities in the Management of Myeloma Bone Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Ruxandra M Irimia, Valentina Goularte, Metodi Balev, Michael Singel, Dan Skoloda, Philip H Imus, Carol Ann Huff, S Abbas Ali, Hua-Ling Tsai, Christian B Gocke","doi":"10.1200/OP-25-00935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Skeletal-related events (SREs) are major contributors to morbidity in multiple myeloma (MM) and can be partially prevented with antiresorptive bone-modifying agents (BMAs). African American (AA) patients differ in incidence, disease biology, and outcomes. However, the characteristics and management of SREs in this population remain poorly defined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 350 patients newly diagnosed with MM (149 AA, 201 White), treated at the Johns Hopkins Hospital between 2016 and 2024. We assessed racial differences in SRE incidence, severity, and timing, as well as BMA administration during year 1 after diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of patients receiving BMAs within the first year was significantly lower among AA patients than among White patients (64% <i>v</i> 77%, <i>P</i> = .013), with AA patients also receiving significantly fewer doses (median 5 <i>v</i> 7 doses/year, <i>P</i> < .001) among BMA-treated patients. Most of the SREs in both groups occurred during the peridiagnostic period (40% <i>v</i> 50%, <i>P</i> = .06). Beyond the peridiagnostic period, the 1-year cumulative SRE incidence did not differ significantly (16% <i>v</i> 21%, <i>P</i> = .24). Among AA patients, those with a peridiagnostic SRE had a significantly higher incidence of subsequent SREs compared with those without an early event (<i>P</i> = .02) and, compared with White patients with a peridiagnostic SRE, were less likely to receive at least 4 BMA doses during the first year (46% <i>v</i> 76%, <i>p</i>-adjusted < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AA patients with MM receive overall lower-intensity dosing of BMAs, yet experience no significant difference in postdiagnostic SREs during the first year. However, AA patients who experience an early SRE are more likely to be undertreated with BMAs, potentially placing them at increased risk of recurrent events.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"OP2500935"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP-25-00935","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Skeletal-related events (SREs) are major contributors to morbidity in multiple myeloma (MM) and can be partially prevented with antiresorptive bone-modifying agents (BMAs). African American (AA) patients differ in incidence, disease biology, and outcomes. However, the characteristics and management of SREs in this population remain poorly defined.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 350 patients newly diagnosed with MM (149 AA, 201 White), treated at the Johns Hopkins Hospital between 2016 and 2024. We assessed racial differences in SRE incidence, severity, and timing, as well as BMA administration during year 1 after diagnosis.

Results: The proportion of patients receiving BMAs within the first year was significantly lower among AA patients than among White patients (64% v 77%, P = .013), with AA patients also receiving significantly fewer doses (median 5 v 7 doses/year, P < .001) among BMA-treated patients. Most of the SREs in both groups occurred during the peridiagnostic period (40% v 50%, P = .06). Beyond the peridiagnostic period, the 1-year cumulative SRE incidence did not differ significantly (16% v 21%, P = .24). Among AA patients, those with a peridiagnostic SRE had a significantly higher incidence of subsequent SREs compared with those without an early event (P = .02) and, compared with White patients with a peridiagnostic SRE, were less likely to receive at least 4 BMA doses during the first year (46% v 76%, p-adjusted < .001).

Conclusion: AA patients with MM receive overall lower-intensity dosing of BMAs, yet experience no significant difference in postdiagnostic SREs during the first year. However, AA patients who experience an early SRE are more likely to be undertreated with BMAs, potentially placing them at increased risk of recurrent events.

骨髓瘤骨病治疗中的种族差异:一项回顾性队列研究。
目的:骨骼相关事件(SREs)是多发性骨髓瘤(MM)发病率的主要原因,可以通过抗再吸收骨修饰剂(BMAs)部分预防。非裔美国人(AA)患者在发病率、疾病生物学和预后方面存在差异。然而,在这一人群中,SREs的特征和管理仍然不明确。方法:我们对2016年至2024年间在约翰霍普金斯医院接受治疗的350例新诊断为MM的患者(149例AA, 201例White)进行了回顾性队列研究。我们评估了SRE发病率、严重程度、时间以及诊断后1年内BMA给药的种族差异。结果:AA患者第一年接受bma治疗的患者比例显著低于White患者(64% vs 77%, P = 0.013), AA患者接受bma治疗的患者剂量也显著少于White患者(中位5 vs 7剂量/年,P < 0.001)。两组SREs的发生率均为围诊断期(40% vs 50%, P = 0.06)。在围诊断期之后,1年累积SRE发生率无显著差异(16% vs 21%, P = 0.24)。在AA患者中,与没有早期SRE事件的患者相比,发生围诊断期SRE的患者后续SREs的发生率显著更高(P = 0.02),与发生围诊断期SRE的White患者相比,第一年接受至少4次BMA剂量的可能性更小(46% vs 76%, P调整后< 0.001)。结论:AA合并MM的患者接受总体低强度bma治疗,但在诊断后第一年的SREs无显著差异。然而,经历早期SRE的AA患者更有可能接受bma治疗不足,潜在地增加了复发事件的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
518
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书