Cécile Luc-Rey, Anthony G E Mathiron, Pierre-Louis Hombert, Nicolas Delorme, Benoît J D Ferrari, Hélène Budzinski, Guillaume Jubeaux, Olivier Geffard
{"title":"Feeding and reproduction measurement in Gammarus fossarum: recommendations for freshwater sediment toxicity assessment.","authors":"Cécile Luc-Rey, Anthony G E Mathiron, Pierre-Louis Hombert, Nicolas Delorme, Benoît J D Ferrari, Hélène Budzinski, Guillaume Jubeaux, Olivier Geffard","doi":"10.1093/inteam/vjag156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sediments are a key compartment of aquatic ecosystems, providing habitat for benthic species while acting as both sink and source of contaminants. Sediment quality assessment relies largely on chemical analyses that do not account for contaminant bioavailability or mixture effects. Sediment toxicity bioassays could address these gaps, but standardized test using European species remain scarce. This study aimed to develop two new bioassays on sediments - feeding and reproduction- using a freshwater amphipod Gammarus fossarum, a species widely used in European ecotoxicology. A total of 137 natural sediments, characterized in terms of physical and chemical properties, from four French river basins were tested, alongside a formulated sediment used as a laboratory control and reference. Three key questions were investigated: (1) whether grain size and organic carbon content act as confounding factors on survival, consumption rate of MUG® and fecundity; (2) whether a formulated sediment provides a suitable laboratory control; and (3) whether the two bioassays can discriminate between natural sediments of contrasting toxicity. Results showed no correlation between grain size or organic carbon content and consumption rate or fecundity, indicating that these properties did not confound the interpretation of bioassays. While survival in formulated sediment met established validity criteria, feeding rate and fecundity were significantly altered, questioning its suitability as a reference. A threshold-based statistical approach, derived from the distribution of responses across natural sediments, was therefore proposed as an alternative interpretation method and successfully identified toxic sites. These findings support that feeding and reproduction bioassays with G. fossarum are sensitive and discriminating tools for sediment quality monitoring, under the Water Framework Directive, and dredged sediment management. Further work on validity criteria and interlaboratory reproducibility is needed to support their future standardization.</p>","PeriodicalId":13557,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjag156","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sediments are a key compartment of aquatic ecosystems, providing habitat for benthic species while acting as both sink and source of contaminants. Sediment quality assessment relies largely on chemical analyses that do not account for contaminant bioavailability or mixture effects. Sediment toxicity bioassays could address these gaps, but standardized test using European species remain scarce. This study aimed to develop two new bioassays on sediments - feeding and reproduction- using a freshwater amphipod Gammarus fossarum, a species widely used in European ecotoxicology. A total of 137 natural sediments, characterized in terms of physical and chemical properties, from four French river basins were tested, alongside a formulated sediment used as a laboratory control and reference. Three key questions were investigated: (1) whether grain size and organic carbon content act as confounding factors on survival, consumption rate of MUG® and fecundity; (2) whether a formulated sediment provides a suitable laboratory control; and (3) whether the two bioassays can discriminate between natural sediments of contrasting toxicity. Results showed no correlation between grain size or organic carbon content and consumption rate or fecundity, indicating that these properties did not confound the interpretation of bioassays. While survival in formulated sediment met established validity criteria, feeding rate and fecundity were significantly altered, questioning its suitability as a reference. A threshold-based statistical approach, derived from the distribution of responses across natural sediments, was therefore proposed as an alternative interpretation method and successfully identified toxic sites. These findings support that feeding and reproduction bioassays with G. fossarum are sensitive and discriminating tools for sediment quality monitoring, under the Water Framework Directive, and dredged sediment management. Further work on validity criteria and interlaboratory reproducibility is needed to support their future standardization.
期刊介绍:
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM) publishes the science underpinning environmental decision making and problem solving. Papers submitted to IEAM must link science and technical innovations to vexing regional or global environmental issues in one or more of the following core areas:
Science-informed regulation, policy, and decision making
Health and ecological risk and impact assessment
Restoration and management of damaged ecosystems
Sustaining ecosystems
Managing large-scale environmental change
Papers published in these broad fields of study are connected by an array of interdisciplinary engineering, management, and scientific themes, which collectively reflect the interconnectedness of the scientific, social, and environmental challenges facing our modern global society:
Methods for environmental quality assessment; forecasting across a number of ecosystem uses and challenges (systems-based, cost-benefit, ecosystem services, etc.); measuring or predicting ecosystem change and adaptation
Approaches that connect policy and management tools; harmonize national and international environmental regulation; merge human well-being with ecological management; develop and sustain the function of ecosystems; conceptualize, model and apply concepts of spatial and regional sustainability
Assessment and management frameworks that incorporate conservation, life cycle, restoration, and sustainability; considerations for climate-induced adaptation, change and consequences, and vulnerability
Environmental management applications using risk-based approaches; considerations for protecting and fostering biodiversity, as well as enhancement or protection of ecosystem services and resiliency.