Is obesity awareness related to anthropometric measures or sociocultural factors?

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Gulsum Tikac, Seref Duhan Altug, Ayse Unal
{"title":"Is obesity awareness related to anthropometric measures or sociocultural factors?","authors":"Gulsum Tikac, Seref Duhan Altug, Ayse Unal","doi":"10.1038/s41366-026-02238-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obesity, a major global health problem in terms of morbidity and mortality, is prompting research into the relationship between changing anthropometric measurements and awareness levels. The aim of our study was to examine whether obesity awareness is associated with anthropometric characteristics or sociocultural and behavioral characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 123 adult volunteers (aged 30-60) were stratified into groups with normal weight (n = 37), overweight (n = 44), and obesity (n = 42). In addition to sociodemographic data (age, sex, smoking, exercise, profession, etc.) that may affect the development of obesity, anthropometric measurements (BMI, waist-hip ratio, waist-to-height ratio) were taken from the participants. An obesity awareness scale was used to assess levels of awareness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Anthropometric measurements showed no correlation with the overall obesity awareness scale. However, within the awareness subscale, the group with overweight scored significantly higher than the group with obesity (p = 0.005). We also observed significant correlations among the anthropometric metrics themselves. In multivariable regression analysis adjusting for baseline sociodemographic confounders, BMI showed no independent association with overall obesity awareness (p = 0.928). Furthermore, our analysis of sociodemographic and behavioral factors revealed that the presence of a family member (p = 0.025) with obesity and occupational status (p = 0.002) significantly were significantly associated with obesity awareness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The sum of these findings indicates that in this cross-sectional sample, obesity awareness did not significantly correlate with objective anthropometric measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":14183,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Obesity","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-026-02238-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Obesity, a major global health problem in terms of morbidity and mortality, is prompting research into the relationship between changing anthropometric measurements and awareness levels. The aim of our study was to examine whether obesity awareness is associated with anthropometric characteristics or sociocultural and behavioral characteristics.

Methods: A total of 123 adult volunteers (aged 30-60) were stratified into groups with normal weight (n = 37), overweight (n = 44), and obesity (n = 42). In addition to sociodemographic data (age, sex, smoking, exercise, profession, etc.) that may affect the development of obesity, anthropometric measurements (BMI, waist-hip ratio, waist-to-height ratio) were taken from the participants. An obesity awareness scale was used to assess levels of awareness.

Results: Anthropometric measurements showed no correlation with the overall obesity awareness scale. However, within the awareness subscale, the group with overweight scored significantly higher than the group with obesity (p = 0.005). We also observed significant correlations among the anthropometric metrics themselves. In multivariable regression analysis adjusting for baseline sociodemographic confounders, BMI showed no independent association with overall obesity awareness (p = 0.928). Furthermore, our analysis of sociodemographic and behavioral factors revealed that the presence of a family member (p = 0.025) with obesity and occupational status (p = 0.002) significantly were significantly associated with obesity awareness.

Conclusion: The sum of these findings indicates that in this cross-sectional sample, obesity awareness did not significantly correlate with objective anthropometric measures.

肥胖意识与人体测量或社会文化因素有关吗?
背景:就发病率和死亡率而言,肥胖是一个主要的全球健康问题,正促使人们研究人体测量值变化与认知水平之间的关系。我们研究的目的是检查肥胖意识是否与人体测量特征或社会文化和行为特征有关。方法:123名30 ~ 60岁的成年志愿者被分为正常体重组(n = 37)、超重组(n = 44)和肥胖组(n = 42)。除了可能影响肥胖发展的社会人口统计数据(年龄、性别、吸烟、运动、职业等)外,还从参与者那里获取了人体测量数据(BMI、腰臀比、腰高比)。肥胖意识量表被用来评估意识水平。结果:人体测量结果与总体肥胖意识量表无相关性。然而,在意识分量表中,超重组的得分明显高于肥胖组(p = 0.005)。我们还观察到人体测量指标本身之间的显著相关性。在调整基线社会人口学混杂因素的多变量回归分析中,BMI与总体肥胖意识无独立关联(p = 0.928)。此外,我们对社会人口学和行为因素的分析显示,家庭成员肥胖(p = 0.025)和职业状况(p = 0.002)与肥胖意识显著相关。结论:综合这些发现表明,在这个横断面样本中,肥胖意识与客观人体测量值没有显著相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Obesity
International Journal of Obesity 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
2.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Obesity is a multi-disciplinary forum for research describing basic, clinical and applied studies in biochemistry, physiology, genetics and nutrition, molecular, metabolic, psychological and epidemiological aspects of obesity and related disorders. We publish a range of content types including original research articles, technical reports, reviews, correspondence and brief communications that elaborate on significant advances in the field and cover topical issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书