COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF TWO HERBAL MOUTHWASHES AND CHLORHEXIDINE ON CALPROTECTIN IN GINGIVITIS PATIENTS: A DOUBLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.

Q4 Medicine
Georgian medical news Pub Date : 2026-07-01
H Abdulameer, R Badeia
{"title":"COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF TWO HERBAL MOUTHWASHES AND CHLORHEXIDINE ON CALPROTECTIN IN GINGIVITIS PATIENTS: A DOUBLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.","authors":"H Abdulameer, R Badeia","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gingivitis is a reversible inflammatory condition primarily caused by dental biofilm accumulation. Gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) serves as a non-invasive diagnostic medium reflecting periodontal status. Biomarkers such as Calprotectin (biomarker of neutrophil-mediated inflammatory activity) are associated with immune activation and periodontal inflammation and have also been associated with systemic conditions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of two herbal mouthwashes-GEM (propolis, neem, and chlorophyll) and Propolinse (propolis and green tea)-compared with chlorhexidine on Calprotectin in gingivitis patients.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Forty-four male patients with generalized gingivitis were randomly assigned into four groups (n=11). Participants used GEM, Propolinse, 0.12% alcohol-free CHX, or distilled water (control) twice daily for 7 days alongside mechanical oral hygiene. Clinical parameters (Plaque Index (PI), Gingival Index (GI), Bleeding on Probing (BOP)) and GCF biomarkers were assessed at baseline and after 7 days. GCF samples were collected from maxillary anterior teeth by periopaper strips. Calprotectin concentrations were measured via ELISA. SPSS was used for statistical analysis, with a significance threshold of p<0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All groups showed significant improvements in PLI, GI, and BOP (p≤0.001). And all groups showed significant decreases in calprotectin levels, with no statistically significant intergroup differences observed in mean change values (p=0.760). Notably, herbal formulations demonstrated greater reduction in calprotectin (a neutrophil-derived biomarker), suggesting differential modulation of immune pathways.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both herbal mouthwashes and 0.12% chlorhexidine demonstrated comparable anti-inflammatory effects. Propolis-based formulations may represent effective adjunctive alternatives in the short-term management of gingivitis, potentially exerting differential effects on neutrophil-mediated inflammatory responses, with possible implications for systemic inflammatory conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12610,"journal":{"name":"Georgian medical news","volume":" 376-377","pages":"331-340"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Georgian medical news","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gingivitis is a reversible inflammatory condition primarily caused by dental biofilm accumulation. Gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) serves as a non-invasive diagnostic medium reflecting periodontal status. Biomarkers such as Calprotectin (biomarker of neutrophil-mediated inflammatory activity) are associated with immune activation and periodontal inflammation and have also been associated with systemic conditions.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of two herbal mouthwashes-GEM (propolis, neem, and chlorophyll) and Propolinse (propolis and green tea)-compared with chlorhexidine on Calprotectin in gingivitis patients.

Material and methods: Forty-four male patients with generalized gingivitis were randomly assigned into four groups (n=11). Participants used GEM, Propolinse, 0.12% alcohol-free CHX, or distilled water (control) twice daily for 7 days alongside mechanical oral hygiene. Clinical parameters (Plaque Index (PI), Gingival Index (GI), Bleeding on Probing (BOP)) and GCF biomarkers were assessed at baseline and after 7 days. GCF samples were collected from maxillary anterior teeth by periopaper strips. Calprotectin concentrations were measured via ELISA. SPSS was used for statistical analysis, with a significance threshold of p<0.05.

Results: All groups showed significant improvements in PLI, GI, and BOP (p≤0.001). And all groups showed significant decreases in calprotectin levels, with no statistically significant intergroup differences observed in mean change values (p=0.760). Notably, herbal formulations demonstrated greater reduction in calprotectin (a neutrophil-derived biomarker), suggesting differential modulation of immune pathways.

Conclusion: Both herbal mouthwashes and 0.12% chlorhexidine demonstrated comparable anti-inflammatory effects. Propolis-based formulations may represent effective adjunctive alternatives in the short-term management of gingivitis, potentially exerting differential effects on neutrophil-mediated inflammatory responses, with possible implications for systemic inflammatory conditions.

两种草药漱口水和氯己定对牙龈炎患者钙保护蛋白的比较评价:一项双盲随机对照试验。
背景:牙龈炎是一种可逆性炎症,主要由牙生物膜积累引起。龈沟液(GCF)是一种反映牙周状态的非侵入性诊断介质。生物标志物如钙护蛋白(中性粒细胞介导的炎症活性的生物标志物)与免疫激活和牙周炎症有关,也与全身性疾病有关。目的:评价两种草药漱口水gem(蜂胶、楝树和叶绿素)和Propolinse(蜂胶和绿茶)与氯己定对牙龈炎患者钙保护蛋白的疗效。材料与方法:将44例男性全身性牙龈炎患者随机分为4组(n=11)。参与者使用GEM、丙氨酸、0.12%无酒精CHX或蒸馏水(对照),每天两次,持续7天,同时进行机械口腔卫生。临床参数(菌斑指数(PI)、牙龈指数(GI)、探诊出血(BOP))和GCF生物标志物在基线和7天后进行评估。上颌前牙采用围纸条采集GCF样本。ELISA法测定钙保护蛋白浓度。采用SPSS软件进行统计学分析,采用显著性阈值分析结果:各组患者PLI、GI、BOP均有显著改善(p≤0.001)。各组钙保护蛋白水平均显著降低,组间平均变化值差异无统计学意义(p=0.760)。值得注意的是,草药配方显示钙保护蛋白(一种中性粒细胞衍生的生物标志物)的减少幅度更大,表明免疫途径的差异调节。结论:中药漱口水与0.12%氯己定具有相当的抗炎作用。以蜂胶为基础的配方可能是短期治疗牙龈炎的有效辅助选择,可能对中性粒细胞介导的炎症反应产生不同的影响,可能对全身性炎症有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Georgian medical news
Georgian medical news Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
207
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书