Artificial intelligence for white matter hyperintensity segmentation: performance, determinants, and clinical implications.

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience Pub Date : 2026-09-16 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnagi.2026.1930675
Jinhua Hu, Zhihao Zhang, Peng Lei, Jupeng Zhang, Xiqi Zhu, Baosheng Li
{"title":"Artificial intelligence for white matter hyperintensity segmentation: performance, determinants, and clinical implications.","authors":"Jinhua Hu, Zhihao Zhang, Peng Lei, Jupeng Zhang, Xiqi Zhu, Baosheng Li","doi":"10.3389/fnagi.2026.1930675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>White matter hyperintensities (WMH) are key neuroimaging markers of cerebral small vessel disease, associated with cognitive decline and stroke risk. Accurate quantification is essential yet manual segmentation is time-consuming and variable. We systematically evaluated AI performance for automated WMH segmentation across disease contexts and identified factors influencing model performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore from database inception to February 3, 2026 (PROSPERO: CRD420261355769). Studies employing AI-based WMH segmentation and reporting Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) were included. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted, along with subgroup analyses, meta-regression, sensitivity analyses, and publication bias assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>26 studies comprising 4,288 participants contributed to quantitative syntheses: 13 evaluated WMH segmentation in general cohorts, and 13 evaluated AD or CSVD-specific cohorts. In the general cohort meta-analysis, the pooled DSC was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.74-0.82). Disease-specific pooled DSC estimates were 0.75 for AD and 0.78 for CSVD. Exploratory meta-regression suggested an association between scanning parameters and DSC (<i>p</i> = 0.042), whereas magnetic field strength showed a borderline association (<i>p</i> = 0.052).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI demonstrates promising performance for automated WMH segmentation, with U-Net-based architectures showing superior accuracy. However, substantial heterogeneity highlights the need for standardized imaging protocols and robust external validation. Future multicenter studies are essential to improve model generalizability and facilitate clinical translation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12450,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience","volume":"18 ","pages":"1930675"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13624168/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2026.1930675","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: White matter hyperintensities (WMH) are key neuroimaging markers of cerebral small vessel disease, associated with cognitive decline and stroke risk. Accurate quantification is essential yet manual segmentation is time-consuming and variable. We systematically evaluated AI performance for automated WMH segmentation across disease contexts and identified factors influencing model performance.

Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore from database inception to February 3, 2026 (PROSPERO: CRD420261355769). Studies employing AI-based WMH segmentation and reporting Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) were included. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted, along with subgroup analyses, meta-regression, sensitivity analyses, and publication bias assessment.

Results: 26 studies comprising 4,288 participants contributed to quantitative syntheses: 13 evaluated WMH segmentation in general cohorts, and 13 evaluated AD or CSVD-specific cohorts. In the general cohort meta-analysis, the pooled DSC was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.74-0.82). Disease-specific pooled DSC estimates were 0.75 for AD and 0.78 for CSVD. Exploratory meta-regression suggested an association between scanning parameters and DSC (p = 0.042), whereas magnetic field strength showed a borderline association (p = 0.052).

Conclusion: AI demonstrates promising performance for automated WMH segmentation, with U-Net-based architectures showing superior accuracy. However, substantial heterogeneity highlights the need for standardized imaging protocols and robust external validation. Future multicenter studies are essential to improve model generalizability and facilitate clinical translation.

人工智能用于白质高强度分割:性能、决定因素和临床意义。
目的:白质高信号(WMH)是脑血管疾病的关键神经影像学指标,与认知能力下降和卒中风险相关。准确的定量是必要的,但人工分割是费时和可变的。我们系统地评估了人工智能在疾病背景下自动分割WMH的性能,并确定了影响模型性能的因素。方法:按照PRISMA指南,我们检索PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus和IEEE explore从数据库建立到2026年2月3日(PROSPERO: CRD420261355769)。包括采用基于人工智能的WMH分割和报告骰子相似系数(DSC)的研究。随机效应荟萃分析、亚组分析、荟萃回归、敏感性分析和发表偏倚评估同时进行。结果:包含4288名受试者的26项研究对定量综合做出了贡献:13项研究评估了一般队列中的WMH分割,13项研究评估了AD或csvd特异性队列。在一般队列荟萃分析中,合并DSC为0.78 (95% CI, 0.74-0.82)。AD的疾病特异性汇总DSC估计值为0.75,CSVD为0.78。探索性元回归表明,扫描参数与DSC之间存在关联(p = 0.042),而磁场强度与DSC之间存在边缘关联(p = 0.052)。结论:人工智能在自动WMH分割方面表现出良好的性能,基于u - net的架构显示出更高的准确性。然而,大量的异质性强调了标准化成像方案和强大的外部验证的必要性。未来的多中心研究对于提高模型的通用性和促进临床翻译至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
1426
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research that advances our understanding of the mechanisms of Central Nervous System aging and age-related neural diseases. Specialty Chief Editor Thomas Wisniewski at the New York University School of Medicine is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书