Epigenetic memory and allostatic integrity: a theoretical integration of the hierarchical-circular model using a longitudinal methylation signature of dementia.

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience Pub Date : 2026-09-22 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnagi.2026.1919708
Samuel Ruesga Mundo
{"title":"Epigenetic memory and allostatic integrity: a theoretical integration of the hierarchical-circular model using a longitudinal methylation signature of dementia.","authors":"Samuel Ruesga Mundo","doi":"10.3389/fnagi.2026.1919708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Hierarchical-Circular Model of Biological Memory (HCM) proposes that dementia results from disrupted circular information flow across five levels: genetic, epigenetic, allostatic, PNEI network, and interoceptive. Allostatic integrity-the adaptive capacity for circular flow-determines whether pathology translates into dementia.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether a recently published blood DNA methylation signature for incident dementia is consistent with the predictions of the HCM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically mapped Zhang et al.'s findings (44 CpGs, 44 DMRs, pathway enrichments, methylation risk score) to HCM levels and predictions. We interpreted these findings as providing indirect and conceptual support for the model rather than direct empirical validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 44 CpGs/DMRs linked to dementia were enriched in immune and metabolic pathways. Their methylation risk score predicted cognitive decline independently of age, sex, APOEε4, education, and MMSE. These findings are consistent with the HCM's Level 2 (epigenetic memory), Levels 3-4 (allostatic load/PNEI), and Predictions 1 (composite biomarkers outperform single) and 4 (allostatic integrity moderates reserve).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Epigenetic changes precede dementia, supporting Level 2 as an early event. Immune/metabolic pathways link to allostatic load. Independence from APOEε4/education is consistent with allostatic integrity being distinct from genetic risk and reserve.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Zhang et al.'s study provides large-scale evidence that blood DNA methylation may serve as a peripheral biomarker of lost allostatic integrity, consistent with the HCM and supporting a shift from linear to circular, multilevel frameworks for dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":12450,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience","volume":"18 ","pages":"1919708"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13638513/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2026.1919708","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Hierarchical-Circular Model of Biological Memory (HCM) proposes that dementia results from disrupted circular information flow across five levels: genetic, epigenetic, allostatic, PNEI network, and interoceptive. Allostatic integrity-the adaptive capacity for circular flow-determines whether pathology translates into dementia.

Objective: To evaluate whether a recently published blood DNA methylation signature for incident dementia is consistent with the predictions of the HCM.

Methods: We systematically mapped Zhang et al.'s findings (44 CpGs, 44 DMRs, pathway enrichments, methylation risk score) to HCM levels and predictions. We interpreted these findings as providing indirect and conceptual support for the model rather than direct empirical validation.

Results: The 44 CpGs/DMRs linked to dementia were enriched in immune and metabolic pathways. Their methylation risk score predicted cognitive decline independently of age, sex, APOEε4, education, and MMSE. These findings are consistent with the HCM's Level 2 (epigenetic memory), Levels 3-4 (allostatic load/PNEI), and Predictions 1 (composite biomarkers outperform single) and 4 (allostatic integrity moderates reserve).

Discussion: Epigenetic changes precede dementia, supporting Level 2 as an early event. Immune/metabolic pathways link to allostatic load. Independence from APOEε4/education is consistent with allostatic integrity being distinct from genetic risk and reserve.

Conclusion: Zhang et al.'s study provides large-scale evidence that blood DNA methylation may serve as a peripheral biomarker of lost allostatic integrity, consistent with the HCM and supporting a shift from linear to circular, multilevel frameworks for dementia.

表观遗传记忆和适应性完整性:使用痴呆纵向甲基化特征的层次-循环模型的理论整合。
生物记忆的层次-循环模型(HCM)提出,痴呆症是由遗传、表观遗传、适应、PNEI网络和内感受五个层面的循环信息流中断引起的。适应性完整性——循环流动的适应能力——决定了病理是否转化为痴呆。目的:评估最近发表的一项血液DNA甲基化特征是否与HCM的预测相一致。方法:我们系统地将Zhang等人的发现(44个CpGs, 44个DMRs,途径富集,甲基化风险评分)与HCM水平和预测相关联。我们将这些发现解释为为模型提供间接和概念上的支持,而不是直接的经验验证。结果:与痴呆相关的44个CpGs/DMRs在免疫和代谢途径中富集。他们的甲基化风险评分预测认知能力下降独立于年龄、性别、APOEε4、教育和MMSE。这些发现与HCM的第2级(表观遗传记忆)、第3-4级(适应负荷/PNEI)、第1级(复合生物标志物优于单一)和第4级(适应完整性调节储备)预测一致。讨论:表观遗传变化先于痴呆,支持二级痴呆为早期事件。免疫/代谢途径与适应负荷有关。对APOEε4/教育的独立性与适应完整性不同于遗传风险和储备是一致的。结论:Zhang等人的研究提供了大量证据,证明血液DNA甲基化可能是失适应完整性的外周生物标志物,与HCM一致,并支持痴呆症从线性到圆形、多层次框架的转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
1426
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research that advances our understanding of the mechanisms of Central Nervous System aging and age-related neural diseases. Specialty Chief Editor Thomas Wisniewski at the New York University School of Medicine is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书