Effects of multicomponent exercise on global cognitive function, executive function, and brain-derived neurotrophic factors in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and three-level meta-analysis.

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience Pub Date : 2026-09-21 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnagi.2026.1921425
Pengfei Yang, Yongjie Liu, Yiyi Duan, Nguyen Manh Cuong, Yun Bi
{"title":"Effects of multicomponent exercise on global cognitive function, executive function, and brain-derived neurotrophic factors in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and three-level meta-analysis.","authors":"Pengfei Yang, Yongjie Liu, Yiyi Duan, Nguyen Manh Cuong, Yun Bi","doi":"10.3389/fnagi.2026.1921425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically evaluate the effects of multicomponent exercise on global cognitive function, executive function, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor in older adults with mild cognitive impairment using a three-level meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, EBSCOhost, PubMed, CNKI, Wanfang, and Weipu were systematically searched from inception to September 15, 2025, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining multicomponent exercise interventions in older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro scale, and the quality of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE system. Meta-analysis was conducted using a three-level random-effects model in R software, and publication bias was examined. Effect sizes were estimated using Hedges' <i>g</i> with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and 95% prediction intervals (PIs) were calculated to determine the expected range of effect sizes in future comparable studies. Funnel plots and Egger's regression test were used to assess publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10 RCTs comprising 623 older adults with MCI from community settings, hospitals, and nursing homes were included. The interventions consisted primarily of multicomponent exercise at moderate intensity, with session durations of 30-90 min, frequencies of 2-5 sessions per week, and intervention periods of 8-48 weeks. Control groups received usual care or health education. Most studies reported no exercise-related adverse events. The mean PEDro score of the included studies was 6.0. The three-level meta-analysis revealed that multicomponent exercise significantly improved global cognitive function (<i>g</i> = 1.063, 95% CI [0.355, 1.771], <i>p</i> = 0.007, 95% PI [-1.141, 3.267]) and executive function (<i>g</i> = 0.372, 95% CI [0.140, 0.604], <i>p</i> = 0.005, 95% PI [0.140, 0.604]) in older adults with MCI. BDNF was assessed in only two studies, with conflicting findings, and its effects remain inconclusive. Exploratory subgroup analyses revealed that none of the moderator variables reached statistical significance: exercise duration [<i>F</i>(1,9) = 0.127, <i>p</i> = 0.730], exercise frequency [<i>F</i>(1,10) = 3.421, <i>p</i> = 0.094], intervention duration [<i>F</i>(1,10) = 0.0002, <i>p</i> = 0.988], and measurement tools [<i>F</i>(2,9) = 0.882, <i>p</i> = 0.447] all showed no significant moderating effects. Owing to the limited number of effect sizes in certain categories (<i>k</i> ≤ 2), interaction tests were not performed for exercise modality, and results across groups were presented descriptively. Descriptive analyses showed that the combinations of \"aerobic + strength + balance + coordination + agility\" training (<i>k</i> = 2, <i>g</i> = 2.109, 95% CI [0.816, 3.402], <i>p</i> = 0.006) and \"aerobic + strength + flexibility\" training (<i>k</i> = 2, <i>g</i> = 2.039, 95% CI [0.772, 3.307], <i>p</i> = 0.007) yielded large effect sizes. Interventions with session durations of 30-60 min improved global cognitive function (<i>g</i> = 1.236, 95% CI [0.151, 2.321], <i>p</i> = 0.030), as did those with frequencies of 4-5 sessions per week (<i>g</i> = 1.772, 95% CI [0.714, 2.830], <i>p</i> = 0.004). Assessments using both the MoCA (<i>g</i> = 1.337, 95% CI [0.235, 2.439], <i>p</i> = 0.023) and the MMSE (<i>g</i> = 1.054, 95% CI [0.214, 1.895], <i>p</i> = 0.020) supported the positive effects of multicomponent exercise on global cognition. With respect to executive function subdomains, cognitive flexibility was significantly improved (<i>g</i> = 0.437, 95% CI [0.112, 0.761], <i>p</i> = 0.014), whereas working memory and inhibitory control did not reach statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The overall methodological quality of the included studies was moderate; however, most studies did not implement allocation concealment or fully report blinding procedures, indicating a certain risk of bias. Tests for publication bias did not indicate significant bias. GRADE assessment showed that the quality of evidence was low for global cognitive function and moderate for executive function. Multicomponent exercise exerts positive effects on global cognitive function and executive function in older adults with MCI, whereas its effects on BDNF remain inconclusive. Future studies with more rigorous designs and adequate sample sizes are warranted to promote the personalized application of multicomponent exercise in the MCI population.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>This study was registered in PROSPERO (No. CRD420251164302; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/).</p>","PeriodicalId":12450,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience","volume":"18 ","pages":"1921425"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13635199/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2026.1921425","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To systematically evaluate the effects of multicomponent exercise on global cognitive function, executive function, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor in older adults with mild cognitive impairment using a three-level meta-analysis.

Methods: Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, EBSCOhost, PubMed, CNKI, Wanfang, and Weipu were systematically searched from inception to September 15, 2025, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining multicomponent exercise interventions in older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro scale, and the quality of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE system. Meta-analysis was conducted using a three-level random-effects model in R software, and publication bias was examined. Effect sizes were estimated using Hedges' g with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and 95% prediction intervals (PIs) were calculated to determine the expected range of effect sizes in future comparable studies. Funnel plots and Egger's regression test were used to assess publication bias.

Results: A total of 10 RCTs comprising 623 older adults with MCI from community settings, hospitals, and nursing homes were included. The interventions consisted primarily of multicomponent exercise at moderate intensity, with session durations of 30-90 min, frequencies of 2-5 sessions per week, and intervention periods of 8-48 weeks. Control groups received usual care or health education. Most studies reported no exercise-related adverse events. The mean PEDro score of the included studies was 6.0. The three-level meta-analysis revealed that multicomponent exercise significantly improved global cognitive function (g = 1.063, 95% CI [0.355, 1.771], p = 0.007, 95% PI [-1.141, 3.267]) and executive function (g = 0.372, 95% CI [0.140, 0.604], p = 0.005, 95% PI [0.140, 0.604]) in older adults with MCI. BDNF was assessed in only two studies, with conflicting findings, and its effects remain inconclusive. Exploratory subgroup analyses revealed that none of the moderator variables reached statistical significance: exercise duration [F(1,9) = 0.127, p = 0.730], exercise frequency [F(1,10) = 3.421, p = 0.094], intervention duration [F(1,10) = 0.0002, p = 0.988], and measurement tools [F(2,9) = 0.882, p = 0.447] all showed no significant moderating effects. Owing to the limited number of effect sizes in certain categories (k ≤ 2), interaction tests were not performed for exercise modality, and results across groups were presented descriptively. Descriptive analyses showed that the combinations of "aerobic + strength + balance + coordination + agility" training (k = 2, g = 2.109, 95% CI [0.816, 3.402], p = 0.006) and "aerobic + strength + flexibility" training (k = 2, g = 2.039, 95% CI [0.772, 3.307], p = 0.007) yielded large effect sizes. Interventions with session durations of 30-60 min improved global cognitive function (g = 1.236, 95% CI [0.151, 2.321], p = 0.030), as did those with frequencies of 4-5 sessions per week (g = 1.772, 95% CI [0.714, 2.830], p = 0.004). Assessments using both the MoCA (g = 1.337, 95% CI [0.235, 2.439], p = 0.023) and the MMSE (g = 1.054, 95% CI [0.214, 1.895], p = 0.020) supported the positive effects of multicomponent exercise on global cognition. With respect to executive function subdomains, cognitive flexibility was significantly improved (g = 0.437, 95% CI [0.112, 0.761], p = 0.014), whereas working memory and inhibitory control did not reach statistical significance.

Discussion: The overall methodological quality of the included studies was moderate; however, most studies did not implement allocation concealment or fully report blinding procedures, indicating a certain risk of bias. Tests for publication bias did not indicate significant bias. GRADE assessment showed that the quality of evidence was low for global cognitive function and moderate for executive function. Multicomponent exercise exerts positive effects on global cognitive function and executive function in older adults with MCI, whereas its effects on BDNF remain inconclusive. Future studies with more rigorous designs and adequate sample sizes are warranted to promote the personalized application of multicomponent exercise in the MCI population.

Systematic review registration: This study was registered in PROSPERO (No. CRD420251164302; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/).

多组分运动对轻度认知障碍老年人整体认知功能、执行功能和脑源性神经营养因子的影响:一项系统综述和三水平荟萃分析
目的:通过三水平荟萃分析,系统评估多组分运动对轻度认知障碍老年人整体认知功能、执行功能和脑源性神经营养因子的影响。方法:系统检索Web of Science、Cochrane Library、Embase、EBSCOhost、PubMed、中国知网(CNKI)、万方网(Wanfang)和卫普网(Weipu),检索自成立至2025年9月15日的随机对照试验(RCTs),研究多组分运动干预对轻度认知障碍老年人的影响。使用PEDro量表评估方法学质量,使用GRADE系统评估证据质量。采用R软件中的三水平随机效应模型进行meta分析,并检验发表偏倚。使用Hedges' g和95%置信区间(ci)估计效应量,并计算95%预测区间(pi),以确定未来可比研究中效应量的预期范围。采用漏斗图和Egger’s回归检验评估发表偏倚。结果:共纳入10项随机对照试验,包括来自社区、医院和养老院的623名患有轻度认知障碍的老年人。干预措施主要包括中等强度的多组分运动,每次持续时间为30-90 min,频率为每周2-5次,干预期为8-48 周。对照组接受常规护理或健康教育。大多数研究报告没有与运动相关的不良事件。纳入研究的平均PEDro评分为6.0。三水平荟萃分析显示,多成分运动显著改善老年MCI患者的整体认知功能(g = 1.063,95% CI [0.355, 1.771], p = 0.007,95% PI[-1.141, 3.267])和执行功能(g = 0.372,95% CI [0.140, 0.604], p = 0.005,95% PI[0.140, 0.604])。BDNF仅在两项研究中进行了评估,结果相互矛盾,其影响仍不确定。探索性的子群分析显示,没有一个主持人变量达到统计学意义:锻炼持续时间(F(1、9) = 0.127,p = 0.730 ],运动频率(F(1, 10) = 3.421,p = 0.094 ],干预时间(F(1, 10) = 0.0002,p = 0.988 ],和测量工具(F(2、9) = 0.882,p = 0.447 )都没有显示出显著的调节效应。由于某些类别的效应量数量有限(k≤ 2),没有对运动方式进行相互作用检验,并且跨组的结果是描述性的。描述性分析表明,“有氧+力量+平衡+协调+敏捷”训练组合(k = 2,g = 2.109,95% CI [0.816, 3.402], p = 0.006)和“有氧+力量+柔韧性”训练组合(k = 2,g = 2.039,95% CI [0.772, 3.307], p = 0.007)产生了较大的效应量。疗程持续时间为30-60 min的干预措施改善了整体认知功能(g = 1.236,95% CI [0.151, 2.321], p = 0.030),频率为每周4-5次的干预措施(g = 1.772,95% CI [0.714, 2.830], p = 0.004)也是如此。使用MoCA (g = 1.337,95% CI [0.235, 2.439], p = 0.023)和MMSE (g = 1.054,95% CI [0.214, 1.895], p = 0.020)的评估支持多组分运动对整体认知的积极影响。在执行功能子域方面,认知灵活性显著提高(g = 0.437,95% CI [0.112, 0.761], p = 0.014),而工作记忆和抑制控制未达到统计学意义。讨论:纳入研究的总体方法学质量为中等;然而,大多数研究没有实施分配隐藏或完全报告盲法程序,这表明存在一定的偏倚风险。发表偏倚检验未发现显著偏倚。GRADE评估显示,整体认知功能的证据质量较低,执行功能的证据质量中等。多组分运动对老年轻度认知损伤患者的整体认知功能和执行功能有积极影响,而对BDNF的影响尚不明确。未来的研究需要更严格的设计和足够的样本量,以促进多组分运动在MCI人群中的个性化应用。系统评价注册:本研究在PROSPERO (No. 6)注册。CRD420251164302;https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
1426
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research that advances our understanding of the mechanisms of Central Nervous System aging and age-related neural diseases. Specialty Chief Editor Thomas Wisniewski at the New York University School of Medicine is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书