The risk posed by exposure to pesticides through beeswax to adult western honey bees (Apis mellifera).

IF 3.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Louise Petit, Cameron J Jack, James D Ellis
{"title":"The risk posed by exposure to pesticides through beeswax to adult western honey bees (Apis mellifera).","authors":"Louise Petit, Cameron J Jack, James D Ellis","doi":"10.1093/etojnl/vgag262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In western honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies, beeswax can help manage bee exposure to lipophilic compounds via absorption, making the compounds bio-unavailable. However, trapped chemicals may be slowly released into the nest environment, posing risks to bees through chronic exposure. Due to their lipophilic properties (logP > 1), many insecticides used in agriculture or for Varroa destructor control in the honey bee nest can accumulate in beeswax. Via in vitro cage assays, we determined the LC50 values of six pesticides (coumaphos, amitraz, acrinathrin, chlorpyrifos, chlorfenvinphos, and bifenthrin) frequently detected in beeswax and determined if the concentrations found in beeswax pose a risk to honey bees. The LC50 values on adult bees exposed to these pesticides in beeswax did not follow the same ranking as their topical or oral LC50 values reported in the literature. The observed LC50 values (mg/g of beeswax) were: Amitraz (1.31), chlorfenvinphos (0.731), acrinathrin (0.504), bifenthrin (0.237), coumaphos (0.104), and chlorpyrifos (0.012). Based on mean beeswax residues of these compounds reported in the literature, the relative risk ranking to honey bees, from greatest to lowest risk, was: Coumaphos > acrinathrin > chlorpyrifos > amitraz > chlorfenvinphos > bifenthrin. Based on maximum beeswax residues reported in the literature, the relative risk ranking was: Coumaphos > chlorpyrifos > amitraz > acrinathrin > chlorfenvinphos > bifenthrin. Our data showed that the compounds tested do not appear to pose a significant risk to honey bee survival at concentrations in beeswax reported in the literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":11793,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgag262","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In western honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies, beeswax can help manage bee exposure to lipophilic compounds via absorption, making the compounds bio-unavailable. However, trapped chemicals may be slowly released into the nest environment, posing risks to bees through chronic exposure. Due to their lipophilic properties (logP > 1), many insecticides used in agriculture or for Varroa destructor control in the honey bee nest can accumulate in beeswax. Via in vitro cage assays, we determined the LC50 values of six pesticides (coumaphos, amitraz, acrinathrin, chlorpyrifos, chlorfenvinphos, and bifenthrin) frequently detected in beeswax and determined if the concentrations found in beeswax pose a risk to honey bees. The LC50 values on adult bees exposed to these pesticides in beeswax did not follow the same ranking as their topical or oral LC50 values reported in the literature. The observed LC50 values (mg/g of beeswax) were: Amitraz (1.31), chlorfenvinphos (0.731), acrinathrin (0.504), bifenthrin (0.237), coumaphos (0.104), and chlorpyrifos (0.012). Based on mean beeswax residues of these compounds reported in the literature, the relative risk ranking to honey bees, from greatest to lowest risk, was: Coumaphos > acrinathrin > chlorpyrifos > amitraz > chlorfenvinphos > bifenthrin. Based on maximum beeswax residues reported in the literature, the relative risk ranking was: Coumaphos > chlorpyrifos > amitraz > acrinathrin > chlorfenvinphos > bifenthrin. Our data showed that the compounds tested do not appear to pose a significant risk to honey bee survival at concentrations in beeswax reported in the literature.

通过蜂蜡接触杀虫剂对成年西方蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)造成的风险。
在西方蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)群体中,蜂蜡可以通过吸收帮助蜜蜂控制对亲脂化合物的暴露,使化合物在生物上不可用。然而,被困的化学物质可能会慢慢释放到蜂巢环境中,通过长期接触对蜜蜂构成风险。由于其亲脂性(logP >1),许多用于农业或用于控制蜂巢中瓦螨的杀虫剂可以在蜂蜡中积累。通过体外笼法测定了蜂蜡中常见的六种农药(coumaphos、amitraz、acrinathrin、毒死蜱、虫腈磷和联苯菊酯)的LC50值,并确定了蜂蜡中的浓度是否对蜜蜂构成风险。在蜂蜡中接触这些农药的成年蜜蜂的LC50值与文献报道的局部或口服LC50值的排名不同。观察到的LC50值(mg/g蜂蜡)分别为:吡虫啉(1.31)、杀虫磷(0.731)、丙烯菊酯(0.504)、联苯菊酯(0.237)、康福(0.104)、毒死蜱(0.012)。根据文献报道的这些化合物的平均蜂蜡残留量,对蜜蜂的相对危险度由高到低依次为:Coumaphos b> acrinathrin >毒死蜱> amitraz >杀虫磷>联苯菊酯。根据文献报道的最大蜂蜡残留量,相对危险度排序为:甘敌福b>毒死蜱b>咪唑b>丙烯菊酯b>杀虫磷b>联苯菊酯。我们的数据显示,在文献报道的蜂蜡浓度下,测试的化合物似乎不会对蜜蜂的生存构成重大风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
9.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) publishes two journals: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (ET&C) and Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is dedicated to furthering scientific knowledge and disseminating information on environmental toxicology and chemistry, including the application of these sciences to risk assessment.[...] Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is interdisciplinary in scope and integrates the fields of environmental toxicology; environmental, analytical, and molecular chemistry; ecology; physiology; biochemistry; microbiology; genetics; genomics; environmental engineering; chemical, environmental, and biological modeling; epidemiology; and earth sciences. ET&C seeks to publish papers describing original experimental or theoretical work that significantly advances understanding in the area of environmental toxicology, environmental chemistry and hazard/risk assessment. Emphasis is given to papers that enhance capabilities for the prediction, measurement, and assessment of the fate and effects of chemicals in the environment, rather than simply providing additional data. The scientific impact of papers is judged in terms of the breadth and depth of the findings and the expected influence on existing or future scientific practice. Methodological papers must make clear not only how the work differs from existing practice, but the significance of these differences to the field. Site-based research or monitoring must have regional or global implications beyond the particular site, such as evaluating processes, mechanisms, or theory under a natural environmental setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书