{"title":"The risk posed by exposure to pesticides through beeswax to adult western honey bees (Apis mellifera).","authors":"Louise Petit, Cameron J Jack, James D Ellis","doi":"10.1093/etojnl/vgag262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In western honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies, beeswax can help manage bee exposure to lipophilic compounds via absorption, making the compounds bio-unavailable. However, trapped chemicals may be slowly released into the nest environment, posing risks to bees through chronic exposure. Due to their lipophilic properties (logP > 1), many insecticides used in agriculture or for Varroa destructor control in the honey bee nest can accumulate in beeswax. Via in vitro cage assays, we determined the LC50 values of six pesticides (coumaphos, amitraz, acrinathrin, chlorpyrifos, chlorfenvinphos, and bifenthrin) frequently detected in beeswax and determined if the concentrations found in beeswax pose a risk to honey bees. The LC50 values on adult bees exposed to these pesticides in beeswax did not follow the same ranking as their topical or oral LC50 values reported in the literature. The observed LC50 values (mg/g of beeswax) were: Amitraz (1.31), chlorfenvinphos (0.731), acrinathrin (0.504), bifenthrin (0.237), coumaphos (0.104), and chlorpyrifos (0.012). Based on mean beeswax residues of these compounds reported in the literature, the relative risk ranking to honey bees, from greatest to lowest risk, was: Coumaphos > acrinathrin > chlorpyrifos > amitraz > chlorfenvinphos > bifenthrin. Based on maximum beeswax residues reported in the literature, the relative risk ranking was: Coumaphos > chlorpyrifos > amitraz > acrinathrin > chlorfenvinphos > bifenthrin. Our data showed that the compounds tested do not appear to pose a significant risk to honey bee survival at concentrations in beeswax reported in the literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":11793,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgag262","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In western honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies, beeswax can help manage bee exposure to lipophilic compounds via absorption, making the compounds bio-unavailable. However, trapped chemicals may be slowly released into the nest environment, posing risks to bees through chronic exposure. Due to their lipophilic properties (logP > 1), many insecticides used in agriculture or for Varroa destructor control in the honey bee nest can accumulate in beeswax. Via in vitro cage assays, we determined the LC50 values of six pesticides (coumaphos, amitraz, acrinathrin, chlorpyrifos, chlorfenvinphos, and bifenthrin) frequently detected in beeswax and determined if the concentrations found in beeswax pose a risk to honey bees. The LC50 values on adult bees exposed to these pesticides in beeswax did not follow the same ranking as their topical or oral LC50 values reported in the literature. The observed LC50 values (mg/g of beeswax) were: Amitraz (1.31), chlorfenvinphos (0.731), acrinathrin (0.504), bifenthrin (0.237), coumaphos (0.104), and chlorpyrifos (0.012). Based on mean beeswax residues of these compounds reported in the literature, the relative risk ranking to honey bees, from greatest to lowest risk, was: Coumaphos > acrinathrin > chlorpyrifos > amitraz > chlorfenvinphos > bifenthrin. Based on maximum beeswax residues reported in the literature, the relative risk ranking was: Coumaphos > chlorpyrifos > amitraz > acrinathrin > chlorfenvinphos > bifenthrin. Our data showed that the compounds tested do not appear to pose a significant risk to honey bee survival at concentrations in beeswax reported in the literature.
期刊介绍:
The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) publishes two journals: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (ET&C) and Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is dedicated to furthering scientific knowledge and disseminating information on environmental toxicology and chemistry, including the application of these sciences to risk assessment.[...]
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is interdisciplinary in scope and integrates the fields of environmental toxicology; environmental, analytical, and molecular chemistry; ecology; physiology; biochemistry; microbiology; genetics; genomics; environmental engineering; chemical, environmental, and biological modeling; epidemiology; and earth sciences. ET&C seeks to publish papers describing original experimental or theoretical work that significantly advances understanding in the area of environmental toxicology, environmental chemistry and hazard/risk assessment. Emphasis is given to papers that enhance capabilities for the prediction, measurement, and assessment of the fate and effects of chemicals in the environment, rather than simply providing additional data. The scientific impact of papers is judged in terms of the breadth and depth of the findings and the expected influence on existing or future scientific practice. Methodological papers must make clear not only how the work differs from existing practice, but the significance of these differences to the field. Site-based research or monitoring must have regional or global implications beyond the particular site, such as evaluating processes, mechanisms, or theory under a natural environmental setting.