Efficacy and Safety of Microneedle Fractional Radiofrequency Combined with Botulinum Toxin Type A for Periorbital Aging: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology Pub Date : 2026-09-28 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CCID.S620438
Yaoying Li, Xueqin Chen, Lan Ge
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Microneedle Fractional Radiofrequency Combined with Botulinum Toxin Type A for Periorbital Aging: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Yaoying Li, Xueqin Chen, Lan Ge","doi":"10.2147/CCID.S620438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare botulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A) alone with a single session of microneedle fractional radiofrequency (MFRF) followed by BoNT/A for periorbital aging.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 35 patients treated between May 2022 and May 2025. Patients received BoNT/A alone (n=20) or one MFRF session followed by BoNT/A 1 week later (n=15). Dynamic crow's feet, static crow's feet, static infraorbital fine lines, the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), skin biophysical parameters, and adverse events were evaluated through week 24; patient satisfaction was assessed at week 12.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dynamic crow's feet improved from baseline through week 16 in the BoNT/A group and through week 24 in the MFRF + BoNT/A group. Static crow's feet improved through week 12 and week 24, respectively. No individual follow-up comparison for static infraorbital fine lines remained significant after exact Wilcoxon testing and Holm adjustment. No between-group difference in wrinkle scores remained significant after Holm adjustment. GAIS was higher with combination treatment at week 16 (adjusted p=0.004). Compared with BoNT/A alone, the combination group showed a greater change in hydration at week 24 (adjusted p=0.021), greater improvement in elasticity at weeks 12, 16, and 24 (adjusted p≤0.002), and a transient increase in transepidermal water loss at week 2 (adjusted p<0.001). Procedural adverse events were transient, and no serious adverse events were documented.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both regimens improved dynamic and static crow's feet during early and intermediate follow-up. In exact multiplicity-adjusted within-group analyses, late improvement was not consistently maintained in the BoNT/A-alone group, whereas the combination group remained improved through week 24; however, no between-group wrinkle-score difference was statistically significant. In this small, predominantly female cohort, the combination regimen was associated with greater improvement in selected skin-quality outcomes. Larger prospective studies using standardized multi-session MFRF protocols are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":10447,"journal":{"name":"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology","volume":"19 ","pages":"620438"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13632624/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S620438","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare botulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A) alone with a single session of microneedle fractional radiofrequency (MFRF) followed by BoNT/A for periorbital aging.

Patients and methods: This retrospective cohort study included 35 patients treated between May 2022 and May 2025. Patients received BoNT/A alone (n=20) or one MFRF session followed by BoNT/A 1 week later (n=15). Dynamic crow's feet, static crow's feet, static infraorbital fine lines, the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), skin biophysical parameters, and adverse events were evaluated through week 24; patient satisfaction was assessed at week 12.

Results: Dynamic crow's feet improved from baseline through week 16 in the BoNT/A group and through week 24 in the MFRF + BoNT/A group. Static crow's feet improved through week 12 and week 24, respectively. No individual follow-up comparison for static infraorbital fine lines remained significant after exact Wilcoxon testing and Holm adjustment. No between-group difference in wrinkle scores remained significant after Holm adjustment. GAIS was higher with combination treatment at week 16 (adjusted p=0.004). Compared with BoNT/A alone, the combination group showed a greater change in hydration at week 24 (adjusted p=0.021), greater improvement in elasticity at weeks 12, 16, and 24 (adjusted p≤0.002), and a transient increase in transepidermal water loss at week 2 (adjusted p<0.001). Procedural adverse events were transient, and no serious adverse events were documented.

Conclusion: Both regimens improved dynamic and static crow's feet during early and intermediate follow-up. In exact multiplicity-adjusted within-group analyses, late improvement was not consistently maintained in the BoNT/A-alone group, whereas the combination group remained improved through week 24; however, no between-group wrinkle-score difference was statistically significant. In this small, predominantly female cohort, the combination regimen was associated with greater improvement in selected skin-quality outcomes. Larger prospective studies using standardized multi-session MFRF protocols are needed.

微针分次射频联合A型肉毒毒素治疗眼眶周围老化的有效性和安全性:一项回顾性队列研究。
目的:比较A型肉毒毒素(BoNT/A)单独治疗与单次微针分数射频治疗(MFRF)后BoNT/A治疗眼眶周围老化的疗效。患者和方法:这项回顾性队列研究包括35名患者,于2022年5月至2025年5月接受治疗。患者单独接受BoNT/A治疗(n=20)或一次MFRF治疗,1周后接受BoNT/A治疗(n=15)。评估动态鱼尾纹、静态鱼尾纹、静态眶下细纹、整体审美改善量表(GAIS)、皮肤生物物理参数和不良事件,直至第24周;在第12周评估患者满意度。结果:BoNT/A组的动态鱼尾纹从基线改善到第16周,MFRF + BoNT/A组的动态鱼尾纹从基线改善到第24周。静态鱼尾纹分别在第12周和第24周有所改善。在精确的Wilcoxon测试和Holm调整后,静态眶下细纹的个体随访比较没有意义。经Holm调整后,组间皱纹评分无显著差异。第16周,联合治疗组GAIS较高(校正p=0.004)。与单独使用BoNT/A相比,联合用药组在第24周的水合变化更大(调整p=0.021),在第12、16和24周的弹性改善更大(调整p≤0.002),在第2周的经皮失水短暂增加(调整p)。结论:两种方案在早期和中期随访中均改善了动态和静态鱼尾纹。在精确的多重调整组内分析中,BoNT/ a单独治疗组并没有持续保持晚期改善,而联合治疗组在第24周仍有改善;然而,组间皱纹评分差异无统计学意义。在这个以女性为主的小群体中,联合治疗方案与选择的皮肤质量结果的更大改善相关。需要使用标准化多时段MFRF协议进行更大规模的前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
353
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the latest clinical and experimental research in all aspects of skin disease and cosmetic interventions. Normal and pathological processes in skin development and aging, their modification and treatment, as well as basic research into histology of dermal and dermal structures that provide clinical insights and potential treatment options are key topics for the journal. Patient satisfaction, preference, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new management options to optimize outcomes for target conditions constitute major areas of interest. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of clinical studies, reviews and original research in skin research and skin care. All areas of dermatology will be covered; contributions will be welcomed from all clinicians and basic science researchers globally.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书