Comparative quantitative analysis of choroidal abnormalities in patients with type 1 neurofibromatosis using multimodal retinal imaging.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Federica Fossataro, Claudia Fossataro, Gilda Cennamo, Alfonso Maria Ponsiglione, Iris Scala, Shilo Voichanski, Ciro Costagliola, David Sarraf
{"title":"Comparative quantitative analysis of choroidal abnormalities in patients with type 1 neurofibromatosis using multimodal retinal imaging.","authors":"Federica Fossataro, Claudia Fossataro, Gilda Cennamo, Alfonso Maria Ponsiglione, Iris Scala, Shilo Voichanski, Ciro Costagliola, David Sarraf","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjo.2026.09.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize and compare, using multimodal imaging, the qualitative and quantitative features of choroidal abnormalities (CAs) in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational, multicentre, retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients with NF1 and at least 1 CA in the macular region were included.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multimodal imaging, including multicolour (MC), near-infrared (NIR), and en face OCT, was collected. CAs were classified into type 1 and type 2, according to scientific literature, on the basis of their size, shape, and pattern. A qualitative assessment of lesion conspicuity was performed using a 3-point Likert scale, as well as a quantitative analysis of lesion area. Statistical analysis was applied to evaluate inter- and intramodality reliability and correlations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 35 CAs analysed across MC, NIR, and en face OCT, the median conspicuity rating was \"medium\" and en face OCT showed the greatest conspicuity (42.9% of CAs) The intermodality reliability was fair to moderate (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.426). Type 1 lesions were more easily identifiable across all modalities. En face OCT provided the greatest sensitivity of detection of type 2 CAs. Quantitative assessment revealed no significant difference in the area of the CAs across the 3 modalities (P = 0.131), with excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.960), high correlation (r > 0.95), and no significant relationship between lesion type and area.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>En face OCT demonstrated better detection of CAs compared with MC and NIR imaging. In addition, lesion area measurements were consistent across all 3 modalities, highlighting their reliability in characterizing CAs in patients with NF1.</p>","PeriodicalId":9606,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2026.09.009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To characterize and compare, using multimodal imaging, the qualitative and quantitative features of choroidal abnormalities (CAs) in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1).

Design: Observational, multicentre, retrospective study.

Participants: Patients with NF1 and at least 1 CA in the macular region were included.

Methods: Multimodal imaging, including multicolour (MC), near-infrared (NIR), and en face OCT, was collected. CAs were classified into type 1 and type 2, according to scientific literature, on the basis of their size, shape, and pattern. A qualitative assessment of lesion conspicuity was performed using a 3-point Likert scale, as well as a quantitative analysis of lesion area. Statistical analysis was applied to evaluate inter- and intramodality reliability and correlations.

Results: Among the 35 CAs analysed across MC, NIR, and en face OCT, the median conspicuity rating was "medium" and en face OCT showed the greatest conspicuity (42.9% of CAs) The intermodality reliability was fair to moderate (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.426). Type 1 lesions were more easily identifiable across all modalities. En face OCT provided the greatest sensitivity of detection of type 2 CAs. Quantitative assessment revealed no significant difference in the area of the CAs across the 3 modalities (P = 0.131), with excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.960), high correlation (r > 0.95), and no significant relationship between lesion type and area.

Conclusions: En face OCT demonstrated better detection of CAs compared with MC and NIR imaging. In addition, lesion area measurements were consistent across all 3 modalities, highlighting their reliability in characterizing CAs in patients with NF1.

多模态视网膜成像对1型神经纤维瘤病患者脉络膜异常的比较定量分析。
目的:利用多模态成像技术对1型神经纤维瘤病(NF1)患者脉络膜异常(CAs)的定性和定量特征进行表征和比较。设计:观察性、多中心、回顾性研究。参与者:包括NF1和黄斑区域至少1例CA的患者。方法:收集多模态影像,包括多色(MC)、近红外(NIR)和正面OCT。根据科学文献,根据它们的大小、形状和模式,将ca分为1型和2型。采用3点李克特量表对病变显著性进行定性评估,并对病变面积进行定量分析。统计分析应用于评估模态间和模态内的信度和相关性。结果:在MC、NIR和正面OCT分析的35个ca中,显著性中位数评分为“中等”,正面OCT显著性最高(42.9%的ca),模态间信度为中等至中等(类内相关系数 = 0.426)。1型病变在所有形态中更容易识别。正面OCT对2型ca的检测灵敏度最高。定量评估显示,3种方式的ca面积无显著差异(P = 0.131),信度极好(类内相关系数 = 0.960),相关性高(r > 0.95),病变类型与面积无显著关系。结论:与MC和近红外成像相比,正面OCT能更好地检测到ca。此外,病变面积测量在所有3种模式下都是一致的,突出了它们在NF1患者中表征ca的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
223
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Official journal of the Canadian Ophthalmological Society. The Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology (CJO) is the official journal of the Canadian Ophthalmological Society and is committed to timely publication of original, peer-reviewed ophthalmology and vision science articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书