Freda Yang, Dominic C Marshall, Imran Howell, Timothy S C Hinks, Kian Fan Chung, Ian D Pavord, David J Jackson, Chloe I Bloom
{"title":"Exacerbation trajectories in biologic-eligible severe asthma patients.","authors":"Freda Yang, Dominic C Marshall, Imran Howell, Timothy S C Hinks, Kian Fan Chung, Ian D Pavord, David J Jackson, Chloe I Bloom","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2026.09.098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Asthma biologics are highly effective in reducing exacerbations. Improvement in exacerbations after biologic initiation is often attributed to treatment effect.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>What proportion of biologic-eligible severe asthma patients improve without biologic therapy, and what characterises those who remain frequent exacerbators?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>Biologic-naïve adults with severe asthma were identified in nationwide UK electronic medical records. Year 0 was defined as the first year patients met severe asthma criteria with ≥3 systemic corticosteroid-treated exacerbations (biologic-eligible). Post-eligibility exacerbation trajectories were identified using longitudinal k-means. Sensitivity analyses included alternative k and a lower exacerbation threshold (≥2/year). Covariates included the highest blood eosinophil count, inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dose and comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 10,078 biologic-eligible adults (median age 51 years; 71% female), we identified three exacerbation trajectories: (1) Remitting-stable (70%, n=7,091), with sustained improvement to <3 exacerbations/year even though ICS reduced after peak exacerbation year; (2) Chronic-frequent (20%, n=1,969), with persistently frequent exacerbations (median 5/year); (3) Refractory-frequent (10%, n=1,018), with high ongoing oral corticosteroid exposure (median >10 courses/year). Results were consistent across sensitivity analyses. Remitting-stable patients were least likely to have bronchiectasis but were otherwise similar in demographics and allergic comorbidities. Blood eosinophil count was higher in the chronic-frequent group (Year 0 median 0.30×10<sup>9</sup>/L) compared with remitting-stable (0.23×10<sup>9</sup>/L) and refractory-frequent groups (0.21×10<sup>9</sup>/L, p<0.001); this was evident several years before meeting biologic exacerbation criteria.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Over two-thirds of biologic-eligible patients improved with standard care alone. Chronic-frequent exacerbators had higher blood eosinophil counts, even years before meeting biologic criteria, suggesting a distinct disease phenotype.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2026.09.098","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Asthma biologics are highly effective in reducing exacerbations. Improvement in exacerbations after biologic initiation is often attributed to treatment effect.
Research question: What proportion of biologic-eligible severe asthma patients improve without biologic therapy, and what characterises those who remain frequent exacerbators?
Study design and methods: Biologic-naïve adults with severe asthma were identified in nationwide UK electronic medical records. Year 0 was defined as the first year patients met severe asthma criteria with ≥3 systemic corticosteroid-treated exacerbations (biologic-eligible). Post-eligibility exacerbation trajectories were identified using longitudinal k-means. Sensitivity analyses included alternative k and a lower exacerbation threshold (≥2/year). Covariates included the highest blood eosinophil count, inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dose and comorbidities.
Results: Among 10,078 biologic-eligible adults (median age 51 years; 71% female), we identified three exacerbation trajectories: (1) Remitting-stable (70%, n=7,091), with sustained improvement to <3 exacerbations/year even though ICS reduced after peak exacerbation year; (2) Chronic-frequent (20%, n=1,969), with persistently frequent exacerbations (median 5/year); (3) Refractory-frequent (10%, n=1,018), with high ongoing oral corticosteroid exposure (median >10 courses/year). Results were consistent across sensitivity analyses. Remitting-stable patients were least likely to have bronchiectasis but were otherwise similar in demographics and allergic comorbidities. Blood eosinophil count was higher in the chronic-frequent group (Year 0 median 0.30×109/L) compared with remitting-stable (0.23×109/L) and refractory-frequent groups (0.21×109/L, p<0.001); this was evident several years before meeting biologic exacerbation criteria.
Interpretation: Over two-thirds of biologic-eligible patients improved with standard care alone. Chronic-frequent exacerbators had higher blood eosinophil counts, even years before meeting biologic criteria, suggesting a distinct disease phenotype.
期刊介绍:
At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.