Exacerbation trajectories in biologic-eligible severe asthma patients.

IF 9.8 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Chest Pub Date : 2026-10-05 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2026.09.098
Freda Yang, Dominic C Marshall, Imran Howell, Timothy S C Hinks, Kian Fan Chung, Ian D Pavord, David J Jackson, Chloe I Bloom
{"title":"Exacerbation trajectories in biologic-eligible severe asthma patients.","authors":"Freda Yang, Dominic C Marshall, Imran Howell, Timothy S C Hinks, Kian Fan Chung, Ian D Pavord, David J Jackson, Chloe I Bloom","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2026.09.098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Asthma biologics are highly effective in reducing exacerbations. Improvement in exacerbations after biologic initiation is often attributed to treatment effect.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>What proportion of biologic-eligible severe asthma patients improve without biologic therapy, and what characterises those who remain frequent exacerbators?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>Biologic-naïve adults with severe asthma were identified in nationwide UK electronic medical records. Year 0 was defined as the first year patients met severe asthma criteria with ≥3 systemic corticosteroid-treated exacerbations (biologic-eligible). Post-eligibility exacerbation trajectories were identified using longitudinal k-means. Sensitivity analyses included alternative k and a lower exacerbation threshold (≥2/year). Covariates included the highest blood eosinophil count, inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dose and comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 10,078 biologic-eligible adults (median age 51 years; 71% female), we identified three exacerbation trajectories: (1) Remitting-stable (70%, n=7,091), with sustained improvement to <3 exacerbations/year even though ICS reduced after peak exacerbation year; (2) Chronic-frequent (20%, n=1,969), with persistently frequent exacerbations (median 5/year); (3) Refractory-frequent (10%, n=1,018), with high ongoing oral corticosteroid exposure (median >10 courses/year). Results were consistent across sensitivity analyses. Remitting-stable patients were least likely to have bronchiectasis but were otherwise similar in demographics and allergic comorbidities. Blood eosinophil count was higher in the chronic-frequent group (Year 0 median 0.30×10<sup>9</sup>/L) compared with remitting-stable (0.23×10<sup>9</sup>/L) and refractory-frequent groups (0.21×10<sup>9</sup>/L, p<0.001); this was evident several years before meeting biologic exacerbation criteria.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Over two-thirds of biologic-eligible patients improved with standard care alone. Chronic-frequent exacerbators had higher blood eosinophil counts, even years before meeting biologic criteria, suggesting a distinct disease phenotype.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2026.09.098","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Asthma biologics are highly effective in reducing exacerbations. Improvement in exacerbations after biologic initiation is often attributed to treatment effect.

Research question: What proportion of biologic-eligible severe asthma patients improve without biologic therapy, and what characterises those who remain frequent exacerbators?

Study design and methods: Biologic-naïve adults with severe asthma were identified in nationwide UK electronic medical records. Year 0 was defined as the first year patients met severe asthma criteria with ≥3 systemic corticosteroid-treated exacerbations (biologic-eligible). Post-eligibility exacerbation trajectories were identified using longitudinal k-means. Sensitivity analyses included alternative k and a lower exacerbation threshold (≥2/year). Covariates included the highest blood eosinophil count, inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dose and comorbidities.

Results: Among 10,078 biologic-eligible adults (median age 51 years; 71% female), we identified three exacerbation trajectories: (1) Remitting-stable (70%, n=7,091), with sustained improvement to <3 exacerbations/year even though ICS reduced after peak exacerbation year; (2) Chronic-frequent (20%, n=1,969), with persistently frequent exacerbations (median 5/year); (3) Refractory-frequent (10%, n=1,018), with high ongoing oral corticosteroid exposure (median >10 courses/year). Results were consistent across sensitivity analyses. Remitting-stable patients were least likely to have bronchiectasis but were otherwise similar in demographics and allergic comorbidities. Blood eosinophil count was higher in the chronic-frequent group (Year 0 median 0.30×109/L) compared with remitting-stable (0.23×109/L) and refractory-frequent groups (0.21×109/L, p<0.001); this was evident several years before meeting biologic exacerbation criteria.

Interpretation: Over two-thirds of biologic-eligible patients improved with standard care alone. Chronic-frequent exacerbators had higher blood eosinophil counts, even years before meeting biologic criteria, suggesting a distinct disease phenotype.

符合生物学条件的严重哮喘患者的恶化轨迹。
背景:哮喘生物制剂在减少急性发作方面非常有效。生物启动后病情恶化的改善通常归因于治疗效果。研究问题:有多少符合生物条件的严重哮喘患者在不接受生物治疗的情况下病情有所改善?那些仍然频繁加重的患者有什么特点?研究设计和方法:Biologic-naïve在英国全国范围内的电子医疗记录中确定患有严重哮喘的成年人。第0年定义为第一年患者符合严重哮喘标准,且≥3次全身皮质类固醇治疗加重(符合生物学标准)。使用纵向k-均值确定合格后恶化轨迹。敏感性分析包括替代k和较低的恶化阈值(≥2/年)。协变量包括最高血嗜酸性粒细胞计数、吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)剂量和合并症。结果:在10078名符合生物学条件的成年人(中位年龄51岁,71%为女性)中,我们确定了三种恶化轨迹:(1)缓解-稳定(70%,n= 7091),持续改善至10疗程/年)。敏感性分析的结果是一致的。缓解稳定的患者发生支气管扩张的可能性最小,但在人口统计学和过敏合并症方面相似。与缓解稳定组(0.23×109/L)和难治频繁组(0.21×109/L)相比,慢性频繁组的血嗜酸性粒细胞计数(0年中位数0.30×109/L)更高。慢性频繁加重患者的血嗜酸性粒细胞计数较高,甚至在达到生物学标准的数年前就出现了,这表明疾病有明显的表型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书