Development of a Multiplex PCR to Detect the BCR-ABL1 Transcripts in Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia Patients in Indonesia.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Management and Research Pub Date : 2026-09-29 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CMAR.S607952
Delita Prihatni, Nur Izzatun Nafsi, Ernawati Ernawati, Nina Susana Dewi, Almira Zada, Yunia Sribudiani
{"title":"Development of a Multiplex PCR to Detect the <i>BCR-ABL1</i> Transcripts in Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia Patients in Indonesia.","authors":"Delita Prihatni, Nur Izzatun Nafsi, Ernawati Ernawati, Nina Susana Dewi, Almira Zada, Yunia Sribudiani","doi":"10.2147/CMAR.S607952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are limited commercial kits available for the identification of <i>BCR-ABL1</i> gene fusion transcripts in chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients. Most kits are based on RT-PCR to detect <i>e14a2</i> and <i>e13a2</i> transcripts as major breakpoint segments, but do not detect minor transcripts. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a multiplex PCR approach for <i>BCR-ABL</i> gene transcripts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Primers were designed to amplify four <i>BCR-ABL1</i> transcripts from the cDNA reverse transcribed from 52 archived mRNAs from CML patients. The <i>BCR-ABL1</i> transcripts were identified by multiplex PCR, and the assay performance was compared to Xpert<sup>®</sup> BCR-ABL Ultra (GeneXpert).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The multiplex TD-PCR successfully amplified four <i>BCR-ABL1</i> transcripts, with detection limits of 10 fg/µL for e13a2 and e14a2 and 100 fg/µL for e1a2 and e19a2. Out of 52 archived RNA samples, 40 were confirmed positive. The most common transcript was e14a2, which was identified in 72.5% of the confirmed positive samples, followed by e13a2, identified in 25% of the positive samples. The e19a2 transcript was identified in 2.5% of the positive samples. No patients expressed the e1a2 transcript type or co-expressed both e14a2 and e13a2. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the multiplex PCR when compared to GeneXpert results were 97.56% (95% CI: 87.14-99.94%) and 100% (95% CI: 71.51-100%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The multiplex PCR assay developed to identify the four <i>BCR-ABL1</i> transcripts can be implemented in CML diagnostic settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9479,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Management and Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"607952"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13633708/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Management and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S607952","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There are limited commercial kits available for the identification of BCR-ABL1 gene fusion transcripts in chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients. Most kits are based on RT-PCR to detect e14a2 and e13a2 transcripts as major breakpoint segments, but do not detect minor transcripts. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a multiplex PCR approach for BCR-ABL gene transcripts.

Methods: Primers were designed to amplify four BCR-ABL1 transcripts from the cDNA reverse transcribed from 52 archived mRNAs from CML patients. The BCR-ABL1 transcripts were identified by multiplex PCR, and the assay performance was compared to Xpert® BCR-ABL Ultra (GeneXpert).

Results: The multiplex TD-PCR successfully amplified four BCR-ABL1 transcripts, with detection limits of 10 fg/µL for e13a2 and e14a2 and 100 fg/µL for e1a2 and e19a2. Out of 52 archived RNA samples, 40 were confirmed positive. The most common transcript was e14a2, which was identified in 72.5% of the confirmed positive samples, followed by e13a2, identified in 25% of the positive samples. The e19a2 transcript was identified in 2.5% of the positive samples. No patients expressed the e1a2 transcript type or co-expressed both e14a2 and e13a2. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the multiplex PCR when compared to GeneXpert results were 97.56% (95% CI: 87.14-99.94%) and 100% (95% CI: 71.51-100%), respectively.

Conclusion: The multiplex PCR assay developed to identify the four BCR-ABL1 transcripts can be implemented in CML diagnostic settings.

多重PCR检测印尼慢性髓性白血病患者BCR-ABL1转录物的发展
背景:用于鉴定慢性髓性白血病(CML)患者BCR-ABL1基因融合转录物的商用试剂盒有限。大多数试剂盒基于RT-PCR检测e14a2和e13a2转录本作为主要断点片段,但不检测次要转录本。因此,本研究旨在建立BCR-ABL基因转录本的多重PCR方法。方法:设计引物,从CML患者的52个存档mrna的cDNA逆转录中扩增4个BCR-ABL1转录物。通过多重PCR鉴定BCR-ABL1转录本,并与Xpert®BCR-ABL Ultra (GeneXpert)进行比较。结果:多重TD-PCR成功扩增出4个BCR-ABL1转录本,e13a2和e14a2的检出限为10 fg/µL, e1a2和e19a2的检出限为100 fg/µL。在52份存档的RNA样本中,有40份被证实呈阳性。最常见的转录本是e14a2,在72.5%的确诊阳性样本中发现,其次是e13a2,在25%的阳性样本中发现。在2.5%的阳性样本中鉴定出e19a2转录本。没有患者表达e1a2转录本类型或同时表达e14a2和e13a2。与GeneXpert结果相比,多重PCR的总体敏感性和特异性分别为97.56% (95% CI: 87.14-99.94%)和100% (95% CI: 71.51-100%)。结论:用于鉴定四种BCR-ABL1转录本的多重PCR方法可用于CML诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Management and Research
Cancer Management and Research Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
448
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Management and Research is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal focusing on cancer research and the optimal use of preventative and integrated treatment interventions to achieve improved outcomes, enhanced survival, and quality of life for cancer patients. Specific topics covered in the journal include: ◦Epidemiology, detection and screening ◦Cellular research and biomarkers ◦Identification of biotargets and agents with novel mechanisms of action ◦Optimal clinical use of existing anticancer agents, including combination therapies ◦Radiation and surgery ◦Palliative care ◦Patient adherence, quality of life, satisfaction The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, basic science, clinical & epidemiological studies, reviews & evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and case series that shed novel insights on a disease or disease subtype.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书