Race and Socioeconomic Status are Predictors of Survival in Patients With Metastatic Bone Disease Secondary to Breast Cancer

IF 2.5 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Cancer reports Pub Date : 2026-10-05 DOI:10.1002/cnr2.70689
Ashley Castan, Rosamaria Dias, Amog Mysore, David Herz, Katie Gotoff, Yazan Kadkoy, Kathleen Beebe, Joseph Benevenia, Joseph Ippolito
{"title":"Race and Socioeconomic Status are Predictors of Survival in Patients With Metastatic Bone Disease Secondary to Breast Cancer","authors":"Ashley Castan,&nbsp;Rosamaria Dias,&nbsp;Amog Mysore,&nbsp;David Herz,&nbsp;Katie Gotoff,&nbsp;Yazan Kadkoy,&nbsp;Kathleen Beebe,&nbsp;Joseph Benevenia,&nbsp;Joseph Ippolito","doi":"10.1002/cnr2.70689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>With implementation of early detection screening methods and advances in medical treatment, there have been improvement in outcomes for patients with breast cancer. Despite this, studies have suggested potential differences in outcomes amongst various racial and ethnic groups. To our knowledge, no study has evaluated if race and demographic characteristics impact survival outcomes in patients with breast cancer metastases to the bone.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>We sought to answer the following questions: (1) Does race, demographic, and tumor characteristics alter survival outcomes in patients with breast metastases to the bone? (2) When stratifying by income and treatment, does race influence survival outcomes in patients with breast metastases to the bone?</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and Results</h3>\n \n <p>The surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) 2016 to 2021 database was reviewed for patients with a diagnosis of breast cancer with metastases to the bone <i>N</i> = 11 833. Patients with known primary breast cancer, known hormone receptor status, known metastasis to bone, known treatment regiment, and no additional cancer diagnoses were included. Using variables within the database, this study collected information on demographics and tumor characteristics. Multivariate analyses were conducted to determine associations between race and other demographic, clinical, and prognostic factors. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were utilized to evaluate outcome by race. Annual household income below $75 000 (hazard ratio 1.111 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.047–1.178, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001]), age over 65 years old (hazard ratio 1.1150 [95% CI: 1.084–1.220, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001]), and race (black) (hazard ratio 1.256 [95% CI: 1.161–1.359, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001]) were independent risk factors for decreased survival likelihood. Surgery (hazard ratio 0.554 [95% CI: 0.507–0.606, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001]), chemotherapy (hazard ratio 0.421 [95% CI: 0.397–0.446, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001]), and radiation (hazard ratio 0.940 [95% CI: 0.885–0.998, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05]), were independent factors that increased survival. At 12-month follow-up (hazard ratio 1.211 [95% CI: 1.091–1.345, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001]) and 5-year follow-up (hazard ratio 1.256 [95% CI: 1.161–1.359, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001]) black women had decreased survival likelihood compared to all other races. When patients were stratified by annual household income greater than $75 000, regardless of treatment, black women had decreased survival likelihood in patients younger then 65 years old (hazard ratio 1.242 [95% CI: 1.117–1.381, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001]) and 65 years and older (hazard ratio 1.318 [95% CI: 1.121–1.550, <i>p</i> = 0.001]). Increasing age, race, and lower annual household income were significantly associated with higher mortality. When controlling for higher income and treatment variables, black women had significantly higher mortality rates at 5-year follow up.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Despite improved treatment methods, disparities among patients with metastatic breast cancer to bone exists. Our findings demonstrate that different sub-groups experience different mortality rates. Further research must be conducted to understand the interplay between these socioeconomic variables and survival likelihood in metastatic breast cancer.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9440,"journal":{"name":"Cancer reports","volume":"9 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13638486/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnr2.70689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

With implementation of early detection screening methods and advances in medical treatment, there have been improvement in outcomes for patients with breast cancer. Despite this, studies have suggested potential differences in outcomes amongst various racial and ethnic groups. To our knowledge, no study has evaluated if race and demographic characteristics impact survival outcomes in patients with breast cancer metastases to the bone.

Aims

We sought to answer the following questions: (1) Does race, demographic, and tumor characteristics alter survival outcomes in patients with breast metastases to the bone? (2) When stratifying by income and treatment, does race influence survival outcomes in patients with breast metastases to the bone?

Methods and Results

The surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) 2016 to 2021 database was reviewed for patients with a diagnosis of breast cancer with metastases to the bone N = 11 833. Patients with known primary breast cancer, known hormone receptor status, known metastasis to bone, known treatment regiment, and no additional cancer diagnoses were included. Using variables within the database, this study collected information on demographics and tumor characteristics. Multivariate analyses were conducted to determine associations between race and other demographic, clinical, and prognostic factors. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were utilized to evaluate outcome by race. Annual household income below $75 000 (hazard ratio 1.111 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.047–1.178, p < 0.001]), age over 65 years old (hazard ratio 1.1150 [95% CI: 1.084–1.220, p < 0.001]), and race (black) (hazard ratio 1.256 [95% CI: 1.161–1.359, p < 0.001]) were independent risk factors for decreased survival likelihood. Surgery (hazard ratio 0.554 [95% CI: 0.507–0.606, p < 0.001]), chemotherapy (hazard ratio 0.421 [95% CI: 0.397–0.446, p < 0.001]), and radiation (hazard ratio 0.940 [95% CI: 0.885–0.998, p < 0.05]), were independent factors that increased survival. At 12-month follow-up (hazard ratio 1.211 [95% CI: 1.091–1.345, p < 0.001]) and 5-year follow-up (hazard ratio 1.256 [95% CI: 1.161–1.359, p < 0.001]) black women had decreased survival likelihood compared to all other races. When patients were stratified by annual household income greater than $75 000, regardless of treatment, black women had decreased survival likelihood in patients younger then 65 years old (hazard ratio 1.242 [95% CI: 1.117–1.381, p < 0.001]) and 65 years and older (hazard ratio 1.318 [95% CI: 1.121–1.550, p = 0.001]). Increasing age, race, and lower annual household income were significantly associated with higher mortality. When controlling for higher income and treatment variables, black women had significantly higher mortality rates at 5-year follow up.

Conclusion

Despite improved treatment methods, disparities among patients with metastatic breast cancer to bone exists. Our findings demonstrate that different sub-groups experience different mortality rates. Further research must be conducted to understand the interplay between these socioeconomic variables and survival likelihood in metastatic breast cancer.

种族和社会经济地位是乳腺癌继发转移性骨病患者生存的预测因素。
背景:随着早期发现筛查方法的实施和医学治疗的进步,乳腺癌患者的预后有所改善。尽管如此,研究表明,不同种族和民族群体的结果可能存在差异。据我们所知,没有研究评估种族和人口统计学特征是否影响乳腺癌骨转移患者的生存结果。目的:我们试图回答以下问题:(1)种族、人口统计学和肿瘤特征是否会改变乳腺癌骨转移患者的生存结局?(2)当按收入和治疗分层时,种族是否影响乳腺癌骨转移患者的生存结局?方法和结果:对2016年至2021年的监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中诊断为乳腺癌并骨转移的患者N = 11 833例进行回顾性分析。已知原发乳腺癌患者,已知激素受体状态,已知骨转移,已知治疗方案,没有其他癌症诊断。利用数据库中的变量,本研究收集了人口统计学和肿瘤特征的信息。进行多变量分析以确定种族与其他人口统计学、临床和预后因素之间的关系。Kaplan-Meier生存曲线按种族评估结果。家庭年收入低于75000美元(风险比1.111[95%可信区间(CI): 1.047-1.178, p])结论:尽管治疗方法有所改进,但转移性乳腺癌骨转移患者之间存在差异。我们的研究结果表明,不同的亚群体有不同的死亡率。必须进行进一步的研究,以了解这些社会经济变量与转移性乳腺癌生存可能性之间的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer reports
Cancer reports Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
160
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书