{"title":"Evolving aspects of oral care in older adults: a systematic review and Meta-synthesis.","authors":"Arash Neshati, Noosha Farzaie Ardejanie, Samaneh Naeimi, Marzieh Pashmforosh, Zahra Askari, Alireza Rafi","doi":"10.1186/s12903-026-09781-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The global aging population has heightened the need for comprehensive oral care in older adults, yet evolving aspects such as preventive strategies, technological advancements, and interdisciplinary approaches remain underexplored. This systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis aimed to synthesize qualitative evidence on perceptions, experiences, barriers, facilitators, and impacts of oral care in older adults, guided by the Socio-Ecological Model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA and ENTREQ guidelines, a systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science for qualitative studies published from January 2000 to December 2025. Eligibility criteria were defined using the SPIDER framework, focusing on older adults (aged ≥ 60) and stakeholders. Two reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and appraised quality using CASP. Thematic synthesis was performed using NVivo to generate higher-order themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 1,416 records, 49 studies were included, involving diverse participants from multiple countries. Four overarching themes emerged: [1] Meaning-Making and Beliefs Surrounding Oral Health (e.g., cognitive biases, links to general health, responsibility); [2] Barriers to Accessing and Maintaining Oral Care (e.g., financial, physical, systemic); [3] Facilitators, Strategies, and Ethical Considerations in Oral Care Delivery (e.g., interprofessional collaboration, education, autonomy); and [4] Oral Health as a Determinant of Quality of Life and Human Dignity (e.g., functional, psychosocial, broader implications). A conceptual model illustrated the cyclical evolution of oral care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Oral health in older adults is influenced by multifaceted perceptions and systemic factors, impacting well-being. Findings advocate for interprofessional models, policy reforms, and education to address gaps and promote equitable, holistic care. Future research should explore digital interventions and multilingual syntheses.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13629102/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-09781-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The global aging population has heightened the need for comprehensive oral care in older adults, yet evolving aspects such as preventive strategies, technological advancements, and interdisciplinary approaches remain underexplored. This systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis aimed to synthesize qualitative evidence on perceptions, experiences, barriers, facilitators, and impacts of oral care in older adults, guided by the Socio-Ecological Model.
Methods: Following PRISMA and ENTREQ guidelines, a systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science for qualitative studies published from January 2000 to December 2025. Eligibility criteria were defined using the SPIDER framework, focusing on older adults (aged ≥ 60) and stakeholders. Two reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and appraised quality using CASP. Thematic synthesis was performed using NVivo to generate higher-order themes.
Results: From 1,416 records, 49 studies were included, involving diverse participants from multiple countries. Four overarching themes emerged: [1] Meaning-Making and Beliefs Surrounding Oral Health (e.g., cognitive biases, links to general health, responsibility); [2] Barriers to Accessing and Maintaining Oral Care (e.g., financial, physical, systemic); [3] Facilitators, Strategies, and Ethical Considerations in Oral Care Delivery (e.g., interprofessional collaboration, education, autonomy); and [4] Oral Health as a Determinant of Quality of Life and Human Dignity (e.g., functional, psychosocial, broader implications). A conceptual model illustrated the cyclical evolution of oral care.
Conclusions: Oral health in older adults is influenced by multifaceted perceptions and systemic factors, impacting well-being. Findings advocate for interprofessional models, policy reforms, and education to address gaps and promote equitable, holistic care. Future research should explore digital interventions and multilingual syntheses.
背景:全球人口老龄化加剧了老年人对全面口腔护理的需求,但预防策略、技术进步和跨学科方法等不断发展的方面仍未得到充分探索。在社会生态模型的指导下,本系统综述和定性综合旨在综合有关老年人口腔护理的认知、经验、障碍、促进因素和影响的定性证据。方法:按照PRISMA和ENTREQ指南,系统检索MEDLINE (PubMed)、Embase、CINAHL、PsycINFO、Scopus和Web of Science中2000年1月至2025年12月发表的定性研究。使用SPIDER框架定义资格标准,重点关注老年人(≥60岁)和利益相关者。两名审稿人独立筛选记录,提取数据,并使用CASP评估质量。使用NVivo进行主题合成以生成高阶主题。结果:从1416项记录中,纳入了49项研究,涉及来自多个国家的不同参与者。出现了四个总体主题:[1]围绕口腔健康的意义形成和信念(例如,认知偏见、与一般健康的联系、责任);[2]获得和维持口腔护理的障碍(例如,财务、身体和系统);[3]口腔护理提供的促进因素、策略和伦理考虑(例如,跨专业合作、教育、自主);口腔健康作为生活质量和人类尊严的决定因素(例如,功能、社会心理、更广泛的影响)。一个概念模型说明了口腔护理的周期性演变。结论:老年人口腔健康受到多方面认知和系统因素的影响,影响健康。研究结果倡导跨专业模式、政策改革和教育,以解决差距并促进公平、全面的护理。未来的研究应探索数字干预和多语言合成。
期刊介绍:
BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.