Slavery as a process of maintaining extreme inequality.

IF 8.2 1区心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES

Behavioral and Brain Sciences Pub Date : 2026-10-02 DOI:10.1017/S0140525X26105834

Gewei Cao

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stibbard-Hawkes and von Rueden called for further cross-cultural and quantitative research to understand the mechanisms under their egalitarianism framework. Studying the socio-ecological factors that favour egalitarian processes or inequality and slavery maps the same spectrum of individual autonomy from two ends. Including slavery in the analysis' scope is consistent with their paradigm and complements their approach.

查看原文本刊更多论文

奴隶制是维持极端不平等的过程。

Stibbard-Hawkes和von Rueden呼吁进行进一步的跨文化和定量研究，以了解他们的平均主义框架下的机制。研究有利于平等主义进程或不平等和奴隶制的社会生态因素，可以从两端绘制出相同的个人自治光谱。将奴隶制纳入分析范围与他们的范式一致，并补充了他们的方法。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 医学-行为科学

CiteScore

1.40

自引率

1.70%

发文量

353

期刊介绍： Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) is a highly respected journal that employs an innovative approach called Open Peer Commentary. This format allows for the publication of noteworthy and contentious research from various fields including psychology, neuroscience, behavioral biology, and cognitive science. Each article is accompanied by 20-40 commentaries from experts across these disciplines, as well as a response from the author themselves. This unique setup creates a captivating forum for the exchange of ideas, critical analysis, and the integration of research within the behavioral and brain sciences, spanning topics from molecular neurobiology and artificial intelligence to the philosophy of the mind.