Wael Farchoukh, Bshara Sleem, Ahmad Hammad, Jeffrey Yammine, Said Saghieh, Rida Kassim
{"title":"Harnessing Acoustic Energy Against Orthopedic Biofilms: Ultrasound-Based Therapeutic Strategies for Implant-Associated and Bone Infections.","authors":"Wael Farchoukh, Bshara Sleem, Ahmad Hammad, Jeffrey Yammine, Said Saghieh, Rida Kassim","doi":"10.1016/j.bj.2026.101045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Orthopedic implant-associated and bone infections remain difficult to eradicate because microorganisms can establish biofilms on prosthetic surfaces, devitalized bone, and synovial aggregates. These communities impede antimicrobial penetration and host clearance, while metabolically altered and persister-like states further contribute to treatment failure and recurrence. Ultrasound-based technologies are being investigated as adjunctive strategies because acoustic energy can provide mechanical biofilm disruption, trigger local drug release, activate sonosensitizers, enhance catalytic reactions, and, in selected systems, modulate the infected tissue microenvironment. This narrative review critically examines the mechanistic basis and translational evidence for ultrasound-assisted antimicrobial delivery, phase-transition systems, sonodynamic therapy (SDT), ultrasound-enhanced nanozyme catalysis, piezocatalytic strategies, and multifunctional hydrogel platforms in orthopedic infection. Particular attention is given to the maturity and clinical relevance of the infection models, the contribution of non-ultrasound co-therapies, ultrasound dose reporting, and the distinction between direct regenerative effects and secondary recovery after bacterial clearance. Current evidence remains predominantly preclinical and heterogeneous, and clinical translation will require standardized acoustic dosimetry, chronic and polymicrobial infection models, tissue-specific safety assessment, and integration with established surgical and antimicrobial pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":8934,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Journal","volume":" ","pages":"101045"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2026.101045","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Orthopedic implant-associated and bone infections remain difficult to eradicate because microorganisms can establish biofilms on prosthetic surfaces, devitalized bone, and synovial aggregates. These communities impede antimicrobial penetration and host clearance, while metabolically altered and persister-like states further contribute to treatment failure and recurrence. Ultrasound-based technologies are being investigated as adjunctive strategies because acoustic energy can provide mechanical biofilm disruption, trigger local drug release, activate sonosensitizers, enhance catalytic reactions, and, in selected systems, modulate the infected tissue microenvironment. This narrative review critically examines the mechanistic basis and translational evidence for ultrasound-assisted antimicrobial delivery, phase-transition systems, sonodynamic therapy (SDT), ultrasound-enhanced nanozyme catalysis, piezocatalytic strategies, and multifunctional hydrogel platforms in orthopedic infection. Particular attention is given to the maturity and clinical relevance of the infection models, the contribution of non-ultrasound co-therapies, ultrasound dose reporting, and the distinction between direct regenerative effects and secondary recovery after bacterial clearance. Current evidence remains predominantly preclinical and heterogeneous, and clinical translation will require standardized acoustic dosimetry, chronic and polymicrobial infection models, tissue-specific safety assessment, and integration with established surgical and antimicrobial pathways.
期刊介绍:
Biomedical Journal publishes 6 peer-reviewed issues per year in all fields of clinical and biomedical sciences for an internationally diverse authorship. Unlike most open access journals, which are free to readers but not authors, Biomedical Journal does not charge for subscription, submission, processing or publication of manuscripts, nor for color reproduction of photographs.
Clinical studies, accounts of clinical trials, biomarker studies, and characterization of human pathogens are within the scope of the journal, as well as basic studies in model species such as Escherichia coli, Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, and Mus musculus revealing the function of molecules, cells, and tissues relevant for human health. However, articles on other species can be published if they contribute to our understanding of basic mechanisms of biology.
A highly-cited international editorial board assures timely publication of manuscripts. Reviews on recent progress in biomedical sciences are commissioned by the editors.