Reliability, Validity, and Diagnostic Accuracy of the Persian Six-Item Cognitive Impairment Test (6-CIT) in Older Adult Outpatients

IF 2.8 3区 心理学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Seyed Mohammad Mahdi Sadeghi, Amirreza Esmaeili, Maryam Pourshams, Vahid Saeedi, Seyed Kazem Malakouti, Leila Kamalzadeh
{"title":"Reliability, Validity, and Diagnostic Accuracy of the Persian Six-Item Cognitive Impairment Test (6-CIT) in Older Adult Outpatients","authors":"Seyed Mohammad Mahdi Sadeghi,&nbsp;Amirreza Esmaeili,&nbsp;Maryam Pourshams,&nbsp;Vahid Saeedi,&nbsp;Seyed Kazem Malakouti,&nbsp;Leila Kamalzadeh","doi":"10.1002/brb3.71818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Early detection of neurocognitive disorders is crucial for timely intervention in older adults. The Six-Item Cognitive Impairment Test (6-CIT) is a brief screening tool designed for rapid cognitive assessment, but a validated Persian version has not been available to date. This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and psychometrically evaluate the Persian version of the 6-CIT among Iranian older adults.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In this prospective cross-sectional psychometric validation and diagnostic accuracy study, 180 participants aged ≥ 60 years were recruited from outpatient geriatric clinics and categorized into three equal groups: normal cognition, Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), and dementia. Diagnoses were established by a geriatric psychiatrist using DSM-5 criteria, and severity was staged using the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) criteria. Reliability was assessed through internal consistency (Cronbach's <i>α</i>) and test–retest stability (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC 3,1). Validity was examined via convergent validity with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and exploratory principal component analysis (PCA). Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and Youden's J index.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The Persian 6-CIT demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's <i>α</i> = 0.836) and strong test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.849). A strong negative correlation with the MMSE supported convergent validity (<i>ρ</i> = –0.919, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). PCA supported a unidimensional structure explaining 71.72% of the total variance. ROC analysis for dementia yielded an AUC of 0.984 (95% CI: 0.961–1.000); a cutoff score of ≥ 11 provided 96.7% sensitivity and 85.8% specificity, while a cutoff of ≥ 14 maximized overall mathematical accuracy (93.3% sensitivity, 94.2% specificity). Furthermore, diagnostic accuracy for MCI was also high (AUC = 0.976, 95% CI: 0.947–0.997), with an optimal cutoff of ≥ 2 yielding 96.7% sensitivity and 96.7% specificity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The Persian 6-CIT is a brief, reliable, and valid instrument for screening both MCI and dementia among Iranian older adults in specialized outpatient settings.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9081,"journal":{"name":"Brain and Behavior","volume":"16 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13627878/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/brb3.71818","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Early detection of neurocognitive disorders is crucial for timely intervention in older adults. The Six-Item Cognitive Impairment Test (6-CIT) is a brief screening tool designed for rapid cognitive assessment, but a validated Persian version has not been available to date. This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and psychometrically evaluate the Persian version of the 6-CIT among Iranian older adults.

Methods

In this prospective cross-sectional psychometric validation and diagnostic accuracy study, 180 participants aged ≥ 60 years were recruited from outpatient geriatric clinics and categorized into three equal groups: normal cognition, Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), and dementia. Diagnoses were established by a geriatric psychiatrist using DSM-5 criteria, and severity was staged using the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) criteria. Reliability was assessed through internal consistency (Cronbach's α) and test–retest stability (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC 3,1). Validity was examined via convergent validity with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and exploratory principal component analysis (PCA). Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and Youden's J index.

Results

The Persian 6-CIT demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.836) and strong test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.849). A strong negative correlation with the MMSE supported convergent validity (ρ = –0.919, p < 0.001). PCA supported a unidimensional structure explaining 71.72% of the total variance. ROC analysis for dementia yielded an AUC of 0.984 (95% CI: 0.961–1.000); a cutoff score of ≥ 11 provided 96.7% sensitivity and 85.8% specificity, while a cutoff of ≥ 14 maximized overall mathematical accuracy (93.3% sensitivity, 94.2% specificity). Furthermore, diagnostic accuracy for MCI was also high (AUC = 0.976, 95% CI: 0.947–0.997), with an optimal cutoff of ≥ 2 yielding 96.7% sensitivity and 96.7% specificity.

Conclusions

The Persian 6-CIT is a brief, reliable, and valid instrument for screening both MCI and dementia among Iranian older adults in specialized outpatient settings.

波斯六项认知障碍测验(6-CIT)在老年门诊病人中的信度、效度和诊断准确性。
早期发现神经认知障碍对于老年人的及时干预至关重要。六项认知障碍测试(6-CIT)是一种用于快速认知评估的简短筛选工具,但迄今为止还没有经过验证的波斯语版本。本研究旨在对伊朗老年人的波斯语版6-CIT进行翻译、文化适应和心理测量学评估。方法:在这项前瞻性横断面心理测量验证和诊断准确性研究中,从门诊老年诊所招募了180名年龄≥60岁的参与者,并将其分为三组:正常认知、轻度认知障碍(MCI)和痴呆。诊断由老年精神病学家根据DSM-5标准确定,严重程度根据临床痴呆评分(CDR)标准进行分期。信度通过内部一致性(Cronbach’s α)和重测稳定性(类内相关系数,ICC 3,1)来评估。通过简易精神状态检查(MMSE)和探索性主成分分析(PCA)的收敛效度来检验效度。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析和约登J指数(Youden’s J index)评价诊断的准确性、敏感性和特异性。结果:波斯6-CIT具有良好的内部一致性(Cronbach’s α = 0.836)和较强的重测信度(ICC = 0.849)。与MMSE呈强负相关支持收敛效度(ρ = -0.919, p < 0.001)。PCA支持一维结构,解释总方差的71.72%。痴呆的ROC分析得出AUC为0.984 (95% CI: 0.961-1.000);临界值≥11提供了96.7%的敏感性和85.8%的特异性,而临界值≥14则最大限度地提高了总体数学准确性(93.3%的敏感性,94.2%的特异性)。此外,MCI的诊断准确性也很高(AUC = 0.976, 95% CI: 0.947 ~ 0.997),最佳截止值≥2,敏感性和特异性分别为96.7%和96.7%。结论:波斯6-CIT是一种简单、可靠、有效的工具,用于筛查伊朗老年人在专门门诊设置的MCI和痴呆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain and Behavior
Brain and Behavior BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
352
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Brain and Behavior is supported by other journals published by Wiley, including a number of society-owned journals. The journals listed below support Brain and Behavior and participate in the Manuscript Transfer Program by referring articles of suitable quality and offering authors the option to have their paper, with any peer review reports, automatically transferred to Brain and Behavior. * [Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica](https://publons.com/journal/1366/acta-psychiatrica-scandinavica) * [Addiction Biology](https://publons.com/journal/1523/addiction-biology) * [Aggressive Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/3611/aggressive-behavior) * [Brain Pathology](https://publons.com/journal/1787/brain-pathology) * [Child: Care, Health and Development](https://publons.com/journal/6111/child-care-health-and-development) * [Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health](https://publons.com/journal/3839/criminal-behaviour-and-mental-health) * [Depression and Anxiety](https://publons.com/journal/1528/depression-and-anxiety) * Developmental Neurobiology * [Developmental Science](https://publons.com/journal/1069/developmental-science) * [European Journal of Neuroscience](https://publons.com/journal/1441/european-journal-of-neuroscience) * [Genes, Brain and Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/1635/genes-brain-and-behavior) * [GLIA](https://publons.com/journal/1287/glia) * [Hippocampus](https://publons.com/journal/1056/hippocampus) * [Human Brain Mapping](https://publons.com/journal/500/human-brain-mapping) * [Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour](https://publons.com/journal/7330/journal-for-the-theory-of-social-behaviour) * [Journal of Comparative Neurology](https://publons.com/journal/1306/journal-of-comparative-neurology) * [Journal of Neuroimaging](https://publons.com/journal/6379/journal-of-neuroimaging) * [Journal of Neuroscience Research](https://publons.com/journal/2778/journal-of-neuroscience-research) * [Journal of Organizational Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/1123/journal-of-organizational-behavior) * [Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System](https://publons.com/journal/3929/journal-of-the-peripheral-nervous-system) * [Muscle & Nerve](https://publons.com/journal/4448/muscle-and-nerve) * [Neural Pathology and Applied Neurobiology](https://publons.com/journal/2401/neuropathology-and-applied-neurobiology)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书