Calf-related environments are reservoirs of Salmonella enterica on northeastern United States dairy farms with a history of endemic Salmonella Dublin infection.

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Maya J Craig, Kevin J Cummings, Elisha A Frye, Julie D Siler, Rebecca J Franklin-Guild, Kelly L Sams, Casey L Cazer, Laura B Goodman
{"title":"Calf-related environments are reservoirs of Salmonella enterica on northeastern United States dairy farms with a history of endemic Salmonella Dublin infection.","authors":"Maya J Craig, Kevin J Cummings, Elisha A Frye, Julie D Siler, Rebecca J Franklin-Guild, Kelly L Sams, Casey L Cazer, Laura B Goodman","doi":"10.2460/ajvr.26.06.0244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify calf-related environmental reservoirs of Salmonella Dublin on 25 dairy farms with a history of endemic infection in the northeastern US. We hypothesized that maternity pens and calf housing areas were reservoirs of S Dublin on such farms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used real-time PCR to detect Salmonella enterica in samples collected from dairy farm environments and subsequently cultured PCR-positive samples. All confirmed S Dublin isolates were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing and whole-genome sequencing. A mixed-effects logistic regression model was used to evaluate the association between farm location and PCR positivity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 678 environmental samples collected, 50.1% were PCR positive for S enterica. A mixed-effects logistic regression model revealed calf-related equipment (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.4 to 3.7) and maternity pen areas (OR, 6.2; 95% CI, 4.0 to 9.8) to have increased odds of testing Salmonella PCR positive in comparison to calf housing areas. Additionally, we isolated and antigenically confirmed S Dublin from maternity pens and calf housing areas. Core genome variation assessment of these isolates revealed high genetic similarity to human isolates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results demonstrate that maternity pens and calf housing areas can harbor S Dublin. Additionally, phylogenetic analysis highlights the potential for this pathogen to spread among human, animal, and environmental reservoirs.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Identifying maternity pens and calf housing areas as reservoirs of S Dublin can inform the development of targeted hygiene and biosecurity protocols for dairy herds with endemic infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":7754,"journal":{"name":"American journal of veterinary research","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.26.06.0244","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify calf-related environmental reservoirs of Salmonella Dublin on 25 dairy farms with a history of endemic infection in the northeastern US. We hypothesized that maternity pens and calf housing areas were reservoirs of S Dublin on such farms.

Methods: We used real-time PCR to detect Salmonella enterica in samples collected from dairy farm environments and subsequently cultured PCR-positive samples. All confirmed S Dublin isolates were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing and whole-genome sequencing. A mixed-effects logistic regression model was used to evaluate the association between farm location and PCR positivity.

Results: Of the 678 environmental samples collected, 50.1% were PCR positive for S enterica. A mixed-effects logistic regression model revealed calf-related equipment (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.4 to 3.7) and maternity pen areas (OR, 6.2; 95% CI, 4.0 to 9.8) to have increased odds of testing Salmonella PCR positive in comparison to calf housing areas. Additionally, we isolated and antigenically confirmed S Dublin from maternity pens and calf housing areas. Core genome variation assessment of these isolates revealed high genetic similarity to human isolates.

Conclusions: The results demonstrate that maternity pens and calf housing areas can harbor S Dublin. Additionally, phylogenetic analysis highlights the potential for this pathogen to spread among human, animal, and environmental reservoirs.

Clinical relevance: Identifying maternity pens and calf housing areas as reservoirs of S Dublin can inform the development of targeted hygiene and biosecurity protocols for dairy herds with endemic infection.

犊牛相关的环境是水库的肠道沙门氏菌在美国东北部的奶牛场与地方性的都柏林沙门氏菌感染的历史。
目的:在美国东北部25个有地方性感染史的奶牛场中鉴定与小牛相关的都柏林沙门氏菌环境宿主。我们假设母栏和小牛住房区是这些农场S Dublin的水库。方法:采用实时荧光定量PCR法对奶牛养殖场采集的肠道沙门氏菌进行检测,并培养PCR阳性样本。所有确认的S Dublin分离株均进行了药敏试验和全基因组测序。采用混合效应logistic回归模型评估养殖场位置与PCR阳性之间的关系。结果:678份环境样本中,大肠杆菌PCR阳性的占50.1%。混合效应logistic回归模型显示,与犊牛圈养区相比,犊牛相关设备(OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.4至3.7)和产房区(OR, 6.2; 95% CI, 4.0至9.8)检测沙门氏菌PCR阳性的几率更高。此外,我们从母栏和小牛圈养区分离并抗原确认了都柏林S。这些分离株的核心基因组变异评估显示与人类分离株具有较高的遗传相似性。结论:母栏和犊牛圈养区可容纳S Dublin。此外,系统发育分析强调了该病原体在人类、动物和环境宿主之间传播的潜力。临床相关性:确定母栏和小牛圈养区是S Dublin的水库,可以为患有地方性感染的奶牛群制定有针对性的卫生和生物安全方案提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Veterinary Research supports the collaborative exchange of information between researchers and clinicians by publishing novel research findings that bridge the gulf between basic research and clinical practice or that help to translate laboratory research and preclinical studies to the development of clinical trials and clinical practice. The journal welcomes submission of high-quality original studies and review articles in a wide range of scientific fields, including anatomy, anesthesiology, animal welfare, behavior, epidemiology, genetics, heredity, infectious disease, molecular biology, oncology, pharmacology, pathogenic mechanisms, physiology, surgery, theriogenology, toxicology, and vaccinology. Species of interest include production animals, companion animals, equids, exotic animals, birds, reptiles, and wild and marine animals. Reports of laboratory animal studies and studies involving the use of animals as experimental models of human diseases are considered only when the study results are of demonstrable benefit to the species used in the research or to another species of veterinary interest. Other fields of interest or animals species are not necessarily excluded from consideration, but such reports must focus on novel research findings. Submitted papers must make an original and substantial contribution to the veterinary medicine knowledge base; preliminary studies are not appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书