Design considerations for incorporating serological monitoring into trachoma prevalence surveys.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Everlyn Kamau, Katherine Gass, Emma Harding-Esch, Martha Idalí Saboyá Díaz, Pearl Anne Ante-Testard, Amir Kello, Robin L Bailey, Kimberly Fornace, Anthony W Solomon, Scott Nash, Benjamin Arnold, On Behalf Of Global Trachoma Serosurveillance Study Group
{"title":"Design considerations for incorporating serological monitoring into trachoma prevalence surveys.","authors":"Everlyn Kamau, Katherine Gass, Emma Harding-Esch, Martha Idalí Saboyá Díaz, Pearl Anne Ante-Testard, Amir Kello, Robin L Bailey, Kimberly Fornace, Anthony W Solomon, Scott Nash, Benjamin Arnold, On Behalf Of Global Trachoma Serosurveillance Study Group","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwag245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Serology is increasingly used to monitor infection transmission and disease elimination. Embedding dried blood spot collection in trachoma surveys allows transmission intensity inference through population-level seroconversion rate (SCR) estimation, but no formal assessment of required sample size has been published. Using serology data from 40 trachoma prevalence surveys, we estimated seroprevalence intra-cluster correlation coefficient, a key design parameter, and assessed survey design considerations for incorporating serological monitoring. Design scenarios focused on proposed operational SCR thresholds (2.2 [no action needed] and 4.5 [action needed] per 100 child years) for interpretation of serological data in low-transmission and post-elimination settings. We evaluated SCR estimation in 42 two-stage designs by calculating precision (confidence interval width around an SCR value) and power (the measure of deviation of suggested thresholds to the SCR value). When the SCR is ≤1.5 and >5.7 per 100 person-years, sample sizes between 300-2000 allowed good precision of SCR estimation. We anticipate a standard prevalence survey with 30 clusters and 30 households per cluster should provide ≥80% power to determine that an SCR ≤1.2 falls below a 2.2 threshold and SCR ≥5.7 falls above a 4.5 threshold. Our results support collection of serological data via the recommended survey design for trachoma surveillance.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwag245","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Serology is increasingly used to monitor infection transmission and disease elimination. Embedding dried blood spot collection in trachoma surveys allows transmission intensity inference through population-level seroconversion rate (SCR) estimation, but no formal assessment of required sample size has been published. Using serology data from 40 trachoma prevalence surveys, we estimated seroprevalence intra-cluster correlation coefficient, a key design parameter, and assessed survey design considerations for incorporating serological monitoring. Design scenarios focused on proposed operational SCR thresholds (2.2 [no action needed] and 4.5 [action needed] per 100 child years) for interpretation of serological data in low-transmission and post-elimination settings. We evaluated SCR estimation in 42 two-stage designs by calculating precision (confidence interval width around an SCR value) and power (the measure of deviation of suggested thresholds to the SCR value). When the SCR is ≤1.5 and >5.7 per 100 person-years, sample sizes between 300-2000 allowed good precision of SCR estimation. We anticipate a standard prevalence survey with 30 clusters and 30 households per cluster should provide ≥80% power to determine that an SCR ≤1.2 falls below a 2.2 threshold and SCR ≥5.7 falls above a 4.5 threshold. Our results support collection of serological data via the recommended survey design for trachoma surveillance.

将血清学监测纳入沙眼患病率调查的设计考虑。
血清学越来越多地用于监测感染传播和疾病消除。在沙眼调查中嵌入干血点采集,可以通过人群水平血清转化率(SCR)估计来推断传播强度,但尚未公布对所需样本量的正式评估。利用40份沙眼患病率调查的血清学数据,我们估计了血清学群内相关系数(一个关键的设计参数),并评估了纳入血清学监测的调查设计考虑因素。设计情景侧重于建议的可操作SCR阈值(每100儿童年2.2[无需采取行动]和4.5[需要采取行动]),用于解释低传播和消除后环境中的血清学数据。我们通过计算精度(SCR值周围的置信区间宽度)和功率(建议阈值与SCR值的偏差测量)来评估42个两阶段设计的SCR估计。当SCR≤1.5和bbb5.7 / 100人-年时,样本量在300-2000之间可以获得较好的SCR估计精度。我们预计,30个聚类和每个聚类30户家庭的标准患病率调查应提供≥80%的功率,以确定SCR≤1.2低于2.2阈值,SCR≥5.7高于4.5阈值。我们的结果支持通过推荐的沙眼监测调查设计收集血清学数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of epidemiology
American journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research. It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书