A preliminary single-group pre-post evaluation of mind-shift-mentoring for depression, anxiety, stress, and cognitive flexibility in Indian adults.

IF 3.8 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Ashish S Patil, Anuj V Mundi, Satya P Singh, Summon Koul
{"title":"A preliminary single-group pre-post evaluation of mind-shift-mentoring for depression, anxiety, stress, and cognitive flexibility in Indian adults.","authors":"Ashish S Patil, Anuj V Mundi, Satya P Singh, Summon Koul","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.107930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Psychoeducational therapies are important because of their crucial role in improving treatment outcomes for a wide array of diagnoses. Mind-shift-mentoring (MSM) is a psychoeducational structured program integrated with physical health components that was designed and tested in Indian adults. This study describes a preliminary evaluation of single-group pre-post changes associated with the program.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate pre-post changes associated with Mind-Shift-Mentoring (MSM) in depression, anxiety, stress and cognitive flexibility in Indian adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-group pre-post evaluation was conducted among 61 adults who completed baseline and post-MSM assessments using the DASS-21 and CFI, with 41 participants also completing a four-month follow-up. Outcomes were analyzed using paired-samples t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test as appropriate, associations were examined using Spearman's rho and Kendall's tau. Follow-up cognitive flexibility was assessed using the Friedman test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MSM was associated with significant reductions in DASS-21 scores and improvements in cognitive flexibility. Among participants who completed follow-up, cognitive flexibility remained higher than baseline at four months, while post-MSM and follow-up CFI scores did not differ significantly. Participant feedback suggested that the program was acceptable and was perceived to reduce anxiety and stress.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MSM was found to be associated with improvement in depression anxiety, stress and cognitive flexibility. However, given the single-group pre-post test design, these findings should be interpreted cautiously. Controlled studies are needed to confirm these results and assess generalizability.</p>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":"270 ","pages":"107930"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.107930","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Psychoeducational therapies are important because of their crucial role in improving treatment outcomes for a wide array of diagnoses. Mind-shift-mentoring (MSM) is a psychoeducational structured program integrated with physical health components that was designed and tested in Indian adults. This study describes a preliminary evaluation of single-group pre-post changes associated with the program.

Aim: To evaluate pre-post changes associated with Mind-Shift-Mentoring (MSM) in depression, anxiety, stress and cognitive flexibility in Indian adults.

Methods: A single-group pre-post evaluation was conducted among 61 adults who completed baseline and post-MSM assessments using the DASS-21 and CFI, with 41 participants also completing a four-month follow-up. Outcomes were analyzed using paired-samples t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test as appropriate, associations were examined using Spearman's rho and Kendall's tau. Follow-up cognitive flexibility was assessed using the Friedman test.

Results: MSM was associated with significant reductions in DASS-21 scores and improvements in cognitive flexibility. Among participants who completed follow-up, cognitive flexibility remained higher than baseline at four months, while post-MSM and follow-up CFI scores did not differ significantly. Participant feedback suggested that the program was acceptable and was perceived to reduce anxiety and stress.

Conclusion: MSM was found to be associated with improvement in depression anxiety, stress and cognitive flexibility. However, given the single-group pre-post test design, these findings should be interpreted cautiously. Controlled studies are needed to confirm these results and assess generalizability.

心智转换辅导对印度成年人抑郁、焦虑、压力和认知灵活性的初步单组前后评估。
背景:心理教育疗法很重要,因为它们在改善各种诊断的治疗结果方面起着至关重要的作用。思维转变指导(MSM)是一项心理教育结构化计划,结合了身体健康的组成部分,在印度成年人中设计和测试。本研究描述了与该计划相关的单组岗前变化的初步评估。目的:评价心理转换辅导(MSM)对印度成年人抑郁、焦虑、压力和认知灵活性的影响。方法:对61名使用DASS-21和CFI完成基线和msm后评估的成年人进行单组前后评估,41名参与者也完成了为期4个月的随访。采用配对样本t检验或适当的Wilcoxon符号秩检验分析结果,使用Spearman's rho和Kendall's tau检验相关性。采用Friedman测验评估随访的认知灵活性。结果:MSM与DASS-21分数的显著降低和认知灵活性的改善有关。在完成随访的参与者中,认知灵活性在四个月时仍高于基线,而msm后和随访的CFI评分没有显着差异。参与者的反馈表明,该计划是可以接受的,并被认为可以减少焦虑和压力。结论:男男性行为与抑郁、焦虑、压力和认知灵活性的改善有关。然而,考虑到单组前后测试设计,这些发现应该谨慎解释。需要对照研究来证实这些结果并评估其普遍性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Psychologica
Acta Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
274
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书