Charlotte Lens, Ellen Coeckelberghs, Liesbet Arnouts, Hanne Van den Wijngaert, Deborah Seys, Kris Vanhaecht, Roel Blondia, Bregje D'haeze, Anneke Govaerts, Marijke Huskens, Annelies Terwecoren, Peter Vanacker, Wendy Van Daele, Natalie Van Mullem, Jelle Demeestere, Caroline Weltens, Robin Lemmens
{"title":"Development and pilot multicentre evaluation of a patient-reported experience measure for acute ischemic stroke care.","authors":"Charlotte Lens, Ellen Coeckelberghs, Liesbet Arnouts, Hanne Van den Wijngaert, Deborah Seys, Kris Vanhaecht, Roel Blondia, Bregje D'haeze, Anneke Govaerts, Marijke Huskens, Annelies Terwecoren, Peter Vanacker, Wendy Van Daele, Natalie Van Mullem, Jelle Demeestere, Caroline Weltens, Robin Lemmens","doi":"10.1007/s13760-026-03201-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The quality of stroke care is typically assessed using clinical outcomes defined by healthcare professionals. Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) can provide additional valuable insights into patients' experiences of care processes. However, existing stroke PREMs have limitations in assessing the experiences of patients with ischemic stroke. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and evaluate a PREM specifically for this patient population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A new PREM was developed, partially based on existing instruments. Stakeholders in the field participated in the selection process, after which the PREM was implemented in a multihospital pilot setting. To evaluate feasibility and reliability, we assessed (non-)response, extreme-category concentration, inter-item correlations, and Cronbach's alpha. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 26-item survey was evaluated across nine Flemish hospitals. The PREM-questionnaire was distributed to 277 patients, of whom 165 completed the survey, resulting in a 60% response rate. Missing values were below the 10% threshold, and no sociodemographic differences were observed between respondents and non-respondents. No concentration in extreme response categories was observed, supporting the instrument's ability to discriminate between respondents. Results of the EFA (n = 105) were exploratory and require conformation in a larger sample.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>The newly developed PREM for patients with ischemic stroke represents a practical update to existing PREMs. The findings support its feasibility, as reflected by the 60% response rate, and provide preliminary evidence of its reliability. Further evaluation of the survey's psychometric properties, including patient-led validation, is required before general implementation can be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":7042,"journal":{"name":"Acta neurologica Belgica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta neurologica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-026-03201-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The quality of stroke care is typically assessed using clinical outcomes defined by healthcare professionals. Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) can provide additional valuable insights into patients' experiences of care processes. However, existing stroke PREMs have limitations in assessing the experiences of patients with ischemic stroke. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and evaluate a PREM specifically for this patient population.
Methods: A new PREM was developed, partially based on existing instruments. Stakeholders in the field participated in the selection process, after which the PREM was implemented in a multihospital pilot setting. To evaluate feasibility and reliability, we assessed (non-)response, extreme-category concentration, inter-item correlations, and Cronbach's alpha. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted.
Results: The 26-item survey was evaluated across nine Flemish hospitals. The PREM-questionnaire was distributed to 277 patients, of whom 165 completed the survey, resulting in a 60% response rate. Missing values were below the 10% threshold, and no sociodemographic differences were observed between respondents and non-respondents. No concentration in extreme response categories was observed, supporting the instrument's ability to discriminate between respondents. Results of the EFA (n = 105) were exploratory and require conformation in a larger sample.
Discussion and conclusion: The newly developed PREM for patients with ischemic stroke represents a practical update to existing PREMs. The findings support its feasibility, as reflected by the 60% response rate, and provide preliminary evidence of its reliability. Further evaluation of the survey's psychometric properties, including patient-led validation, is required before general implementation can be considered.
期刊介绍:
Peer-reviewed and published quarterly, Acta Neurologica Belgicapresents original articles in the clinical and basic neurosciences, and also reports the proceedings and the abstracts of the scientific meetings of the different partner societies. The contents include commentaries, editorials, review articles, case reports, neuro-images of interest, book reviews and letters to the editor.
Acta Neurologica Belgica is the official journal of the following national societies:
Belgian Neurological Society
Belgian Society for Neuroscience
Belgian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology
Belgian Pediatric Neurology Society
Belgian Study Group of Multiple Sclerosis
Belgian Stroke Council
Belgian Headache Society
Belgian Study Group of Neuropathology