Disability Competencies in Medical Education (DISCO-MED): Qualitative Study of Unmet Needs.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Jennifer Crumling, Sarahrose Jonik, Daniel Bastian, Shanee Abouzaglo, Nethra Ankam, Rosemary Frasso, Thiru Annaswamy
{"title":"Disability Competencies in Medical Education (DISCO-MED): Qualitative Study of Unmet Needs.","authors":"Jennifer Crumling, Sarahrose Jonik, Daniel Bastian, Shanee Abouzaglo, Nethra Ankam, Rosemary Frasso, Thiru Annaswamy","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000003172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the lived experiences of persons with disabilities and compare to current disability medical education guidelines, and to identify gaps in medical professionals' preparedness to provide appropriate care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A qualitative pilot study using semi-structured interviews with eight individuals with disabilities. Interview transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis in Dedoose and compared to established medical education guidelines: the Core Competencies on Disability for Health Care Education (CCDHE) and the expanded Framework to End Health Disparities of People with Disabilities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six major themes emerged: (1) conceptualizing disability, (2) patient challenges and empowerment, (3) provider traits and professionalism, (4) provider-patient relationship dynamics, (5) social determinants of health and accessibility, and (6) therapeutic importance and follow-up. Prominent subthemes included empathy and support, communication and consideration, advocacy and acceptable language, accessibility and support, and differing needs. Findings largely aligned with the CCDHE and the expanded framework while revealing gaps with the patient's lived experiences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite existing competency frameworks, significant gaps remain in how medical professionals are trained to meet the needs of persons with disabilities. These findings underscore the urgent need to revise and expand disability-related education within medical curricula to improve healthcare accessibility and quality for this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000003172","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the lived experiences of persons with disabilities and compare to current disability medical education guidelines, and to identify gaps in medical professionals' preparedness to provide appropriate care.

Design: A qualitative pilot study using semi-structured interviews with eight individuals with disabilities. Interview transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis in Dedoose and compared to established medical education guidelines: the Core Competencies on Disability for Health Care Education (CCDHE) and the expanded Framework to End Health Disparities of People with Disabilities.

Results: Six major themes emerged: (1) conceptualizing disability, (2) patient challenges and empowerment, (3) provider traits and professionalism, (4) provider-patient relationship dynamics, (5) social determinants of health and accessibility, and (6) therapeutic importance and follow-up. Prominent subthemes included empathy and support, communication and consideration, advocacy and acceptable language, accessibility and support, and differing needs. Findings largely aligned with the CCDHE and the expanded framework while revealing gaps with the patient's lived experiences.

Conclusion: Despite existing competency frameworks, significant gaps remain in how medical professionals are trained to meet the needs of persons with disabilities. These findings underscore the urgent need to revise and expand disability-related education within medical curricula to improve healthcare accessibility and quality for this population.

医学教育中的残疾能力(DISCO-MED):未满足需求的定性研究。
目的:探讨残疾人的生活经历,并与现行残疾医学教育指南进行比较,以确定医疗专业人员在提供适当护理方面的准备差距。设计:采用半结构化访谈对8位残疾人进行定性试点研究。访谈记录在Dedoose中使用主题分析进行分析,并与既定的医学教育指南进行比较:卫生保健教育的残疾核心能力(CCDHE)和扩大框架,以消除残疾人的健康差距。结果:六个主要主题:(1)残疾的概念,(2)患者挑战和授权,(3)提供者特征和专业精神,(4)提供者-患者关系动态,(5)健康和可及性的社会决定因素,以及(6)治疗重要性和随访。突出的次主题包括同情和支持、沟通和考虑、倡导和可接受的语言、可及性和支持以及不同的需求。研究结果与CCDHE和扩展框架基本一致,同时揭示了与患者生活经历的差距。结论:尽管现有能力框架,但在如何培训医疗专业人员以满足残疾人需求方面仍存在重大差距。这些发现强调了迫切需要修改和扩大医学课程中的残疾相关教育,以提高这一人群的医疗保健可及性和质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
423
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals. Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书