Jennifer Crumling, Sarahrose Jonik, Daniel Bastian, Shanee Abouzaglo, Nethra Ankam, Rosemary Frasso, Thiru Annaswamy
{"title":"Disability Competencies in Medical Education (DISCO-MED): Qualitative Study of Unmet Needs.","authors":"Jennifer Crumling, Sarahrose Jonik, Daniel Bastian, Shanee Abouzaglo, Nethra Ankam, Rosemary Frasso, Thiru Annaswamy","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000003172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the lived experiences of persons with disabilities and compare to current disability medical education guidelines, and to identify gaps in medical professionals' preparedness to provide appropriate care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A qualitative pilot study using semi-structured interviews with eight individuals with disabilities. Interview transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis in Dedoose and compared to established medical education guidelines: the Core Competencies on Disability for Health Care Education (CCDHE) and the expanded Framework to End Health Disparities of People with Disabilities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six major themes emerged: (1) conceptualizing disability, (2) patient challenges and empowerment, (3) provider traits and professionalism, (4) provider-patient relationship dynamics, (5) social determinants of health and accessibility, and (6) therapeutic importance and follow-up. Prominent subthemes included empathy and support, communication and consideration, advocacy and acceptable language, accessibility and support, and differing needs. Findings largely aligned with the CCDHE and the expanded framework while revealing gaps with the patient's lived experiences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite existing competency frameworks, significant gaps remain in how medical professionals are trained to meet the needs of persons with disabilities. These findings underscore the urgent need to revise and expand disability-related education within medical curricula to improve healthcare accessibility and quality for this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000003172","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To explore the lived experiences of persons with disabilities and compare to current disability medical education guidelines, and to identify gaps in medical professionals' preparedness to provide appropriate care.
Design: A qualitative pilot study using semi-structured interviews with eight individuals with disabilities. Interview transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis in Dedoose and compared to established medical education guidelines: the Core Competencies on Disability for Health Care Education (CCDHE) and the expanded Framework to End Health Disparities of People with Disabilities.
Results: Six major themes emerged: (1) conceptualizing disability, (2) patient challenges and empowerment, (3) provider traits and professionalism, (4) provider-patient relationship dynamics, (5) social determinants of health and accessibility, and (6) therapeutic importance and follow-up. Prominent subthemes included empathy and support, communication and consideration, advocacy and acceptable language, accessibility and support, and differing needs. Findings largely aligned with the CCDHE and the expanded framework while revealing gaps with the patient's lived experiences.
Conclusion: Despite existing competency frameworks, significant gaps remain in how medical professionals are trained to meet the needs of persons with disabilities. These findings underscore the urgent need to revise and expand disability-related education within medical curricula to improve healthcare accessibility and quality for this population.
期刊介绍:
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals.
Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).