Green ratio-manipulating spectrophotometric methods for simultaneous determination of empagliflozin and sitagliptin in pharmaceutical formulations

IF 5.1 2区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Ahmad A. A. Mohamad, Ahmed A. Almrasy, Ahmed H. Abdelazim, Ahmed S. Taha
{"title":"Green ratio-manipulating spectrophotometric methods for simultaneous determination of empagliflozin and sitagliptin in pharmaceutical formulations","authors":"Ahmad A. A. Mohamad,&nbsp;Ahmed A. Almrasy,&nbsp;Ahmed H. Abdelazim,&nbsp;Ahmed S. Taha","doi":"10.1186/s13065-026-01935-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Empagliflozin (EMP) and sitagliptin (SIT) are antidiabetic agents with complementary mechanisms of action and are frequently formulated as fixed-dose combinations. However, their substantially overlapping ultraviolet absorption spectra limit the applicability of direct spectrophotometric determination in combined dosage forms.</p><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to develop and validate simple, rapid, and low-solvent-consumption ratio-manipulating spectrophotometric methods for simultaneous determination of EMP and SIT in combined pharmaceutical formulations, and to assess their analytical, environmental, and practical performance.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Two mathematical spectrophotometric approaches, ratio difference (RD) and first-derivative ratio spectrophotometry (1DD), were developed. In the RD method, EMP was quantified using the amplitude difference between 230 and 285 nm, whereas SIT was determined from the amplitude difference between 257 and 209 nm. In the 1DD method, the first derivative of the ratio spectra was measured at 239 nm for EMP and 250 nm for SIT, using Δλ = 8 nm and a scaling factor of 80. The methods were validated for linearity, accuracy, precision, selectivity, robustness, and sensitivity. Their environmental and practical profiles were assessed using the Carbon Footprint Reduction Index (CaFRI), Complex Modified Green Analytical Procedure Index (ComplexMoGAPI), Click Analytical Chemistry Index (CACI), Blue Applicability Grade Index (BAGI), and Whiteness Evaluation for Chemical Analysis (WECA) tools.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Both methods were linear over concentration ranges of 2–25 µg/mL for EMP and 5–100 µg/mL for SIT. For the RD method, the LOD values were 0.326 and 0.419 µg/mL, and the LOQ values were 0.978 and 1.257 µg/mL for EMP and SIT, respectively. For the 1DD method, the corresponding LOD values were 0.324 and 0.423 µg/mL, while LOQ values were 0.972 and 1.269 µg/mL for EMP and SIT, respectively. Mean recoveries ranged from 99.18% to 100.11%, with repeatability and intermediate-precision %RSD values not exceeding 0.761% and 0.979%, respectively. The proposed methods were successfully applied to commercial combined tablets, using ethanol as the analytical solvent. Student’s t- and F-tests revealed no significant difference between the proposed and reported methods at the 95% confidence level.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The developed RD and 1DD methods provide rapid, separation-free, and reliable alternatives for simultaneous spectrophotometric determination of EMP and SIT. Their use of ethanol, minimal sample preparation, low solvent consumption, and favorable analytical, environmental, and practical profiles support their suitability for routine pharmaceutical quality-control analysis, particularly in laboratories with limited chromatographic resources.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":496,"journal":{"name":"BMC Chemistry","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13632342/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13065-026-01935-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Empagliflozin (EMP) and sitagliptin (SIT) are antidiabetic agents with complementary mechanisms of action and are frequently formulated as fixed-dose combinations. However, their substantially overlapping ultraviolet absorption spectra limit the applicability of direct spectrophotometric determination in combined dosage forms.

Objective

This study aimed to develop and validate simple, rapid, and low-solvent-consumption ratio-manipulating spectrophotometric methods for simultaneous determination of EMP and SIT in combined pharmaceutical formulations, and to assess their analytical, environmental, and practical performance.

Methods

Two mathematical spectrophotometric approaches, ratio difference (RD) and first-derivative ratio spectrophotometry (1DD), were developed. In the RD method, EMP was quantified using the amplitude difference between 230 and 285 nm, whereas SIT was determined from the amplitude difference between 257 and 209 nm. In the 1DD method, the first derivative of the ratio spectra was measured at 239 nm for EMP and 250 nm for SIT, using Δλ = 8 nm and a scaling factor of 80. The methods were validated for linearity, accuracy, precision, selectivity, robustness, and sensitivity. Their environmental and practical profiles were assessed using the Carbon Footprint Reduction Index (CaFRI), Complex Modified Green Analytical Procedure Index (ComplexMoGAPI), Click Analytical Chemistry Index (CACI), Blue Applicability Grade Index (BAGI), and Whiteness Evaluation for Chemical Analysis (WECA) tools.

Results

Both methods were linear over concentration ranges of 2–25 µg/mL for EMP and 5–100 µg/mL for SIT. For the RD method, the LOD values were 0.326 and 0.419 µg/mL, and the LOQ values were 0.978 and 1.257 µg/mL for EMP and SIT, respectively. For the 1DD method, the corresponding LOD values were 0.324 and 0.423 µg/mL, while LOQ values were 0.972 and 1.269 µg/mL for EMP and SIT, respectively. Mean recoveries ranged from 99.18% to 100.11%, with repeatability and intermediate-precision %RSD values not exceeding 0.761% and 0.979%, respectively. The proposed methods were successfully applied to commercial combined tablets, using ethanol as the analytical solvent. Student’s t- and F-tests revealed no significant difference between the proposed and reported methods at the 95% confidence level.

Conclusion

The developed RD and 1DD methods provide rapid, separation-free, and reliable alternatives for simultaneous spectrophotometric determination of EMP and SIT. Their use of ethanol, minimal sample preparation, low solvent consumption, and favorable analytical, environmental, and practical profiles support their suitability for routine pharmaceutical quality-control analysis, particularly in laboratories with limited chromatographic resources.

绿比操纵分光光度法同时测定制剂中依格列净和西格列汀的含量。
背景:恩格列净(EMP)和西格列汀(SIT)是具有互补作用机制的降糖药物,经常被配制成固定剂量的联合用药。然而,它们实质上重叠的紫外吸收光谱限制了直接分光光度法测定联合剂型的适用性。目的:建立并验证简单、快速、低溶剂消耗的比例操纵分光光度法同时测定复方制剂中EMP和SIT的方法,并对其分析性能、环境性能和实用性能进行评价。方法:建立比值差法(RD)和一阶导数比值法(1DD)两种数学分光光度法。在RD方法中,EMP是通过230和285 nm的振幅差来量化的,而SIT是通过257和209 nm的振幅差来确定的。在1DD方法中,比值光谱的一阶导数在EMP的239 nm和SIT的250 nm处测量,使用Δλ = 8 nm,比例因子为80。验证了方法的线性度、准确度、精密度、选择性、鲁棒性和灵敏度。使用碳足迹减少指数(CaFRI)、复杂改良绿色分析程序指数(ComplexMoGAPI)、Click分析化学指数(CACI)、蓝色适用性等级指数(BAGI)和化学分析白度评价(WECA)工具对它们的环境和实际情况进行了评估。结果:两种方法在2 ~ 25µg/mL EMP和5 ~ 100µg/mL SIT浓度范围内均呈线性关系。相对定量法的LOQ值分别为0.326和0.419µg/mL, EMP和SIT的LOQ值分别为0.978和1.257µg/mL。1DD法的LOQ值分别为0.324和0.423µg/mL, EMP法和SIT法的LOQ值分别为0.972和1.269µg/mL。平均加样回收率为99.18% ~ 100.11%,重复性和中精密度RSD值分别不超过0.761%和0.979%。该方法以乙醇为分析溶剂,成功地应用于商业复方片剂。学生的t和f检验显示,在95%的置信水平上,建议的方法和报告的方法之间没有显著差异。结论:建立的RD和1DD方法为同时测定EMP和SIT提供了快速、无分离、可靠的方法。它们使用乙醇,最少的样品制备,低溶剂消耗,以及良好的分析,环境和实用特性支持它们适用于常规药物质量控制分析,特别是在色谱资源有限的实验室。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Chemistry
BMC Chemistry Chemistry-General Chemistry
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
2.20%
发文量
92
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Chemistry, formerly known as Chemistry Central Journal, is now part of the BMC series journals family. Chemistry Central Journal has served the chemistry community as a trusted open access resource for more than 10 years – and we are delighted to announce the next step on its journey. In January 2019 the journal has been renamed BMC Chemistry and now strengthens the BMC series footprint in the physical sciences by publishing quality articles and by pushing the boundaries of open chemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书