Isolating viable bacteria from positive blood cultures: impedance cytometry analysis

IF 4.4 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Daniel Nathan Tomás Cançado, Max Seidy Saito, Daniel Spencer, Hywel Morgan
{"title":"Isolating viable bacteria from positive blood cultures: impedance cytometry analysis","authors":"Daniel Nathan Tomás Cançado,&nbsp;Max Seidy Saito,&nbsp;Daniel Spencer,&nbsp;Hywel Morgan","doi":"10.1007/s10544-026-00847-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Bloodstream infections (BSIs) lead to sepsis, an acute inflammatory response associated with high mortality. Current clinical treatment pathways rely on culture-based diagnostics to identify the infectious agent and determine its susceptibility to antibiotics, delaying targeted therapy. Recent approaches to accelerate this focus on the isolation of bacteria directly from blood cultures for rapid downstream analysis using haemolytic agents to replace the gold-standard purity plate subculture. However, many of these methods impact bacterial viability during the early stages of growth. Rapid phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing requires a pure inoculum of actively dividing bacteria to deliver early results (within 3 h), but most isolation chemistries are developed for mass spectrometry identification which does not require viable bacteria. This is particularly relevant for Gram-positive pathogens, as these are more susceptible to detergent agents used for haemolysis. This study investigated five different blood lysis protocols for the isolation of two different bacteria; <i>Escherichia coli</i> (Gram-negative) and <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (Gram-positive) from positive blood bottles. Bacterial viability was determined with microfluidic impedance cytometry and standard colony counting, which was also used to determine the extraction efficiency. For all five protocols, the numbers of extracted bacteria were generally high for the two organisms when determined with colony counting (following overnight incubation). However, when determined immediately after extraction with impedance cytometry, the counts were lower for <i>S. aureus</i>. The bacterial viability was also investigated with optical flow cytometry immediately after extraction showing inhibition of <i>S. aureus</i> growth with Sepsityper<sup>®</sup> but not with the milder detergent saponin.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":490,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Microdevices","volume":"28 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13630967/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Microdevices","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10544-026-00847-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) lead to sepsis, an acute inflammatory response associated with high mortality. Current clinical treatment pathways rely on culture-based diagnostics to identify the infectious agent and determine its susceptibility to antibiotics, delaying targeted therapy. Recent approaches to accelerate this focus on the isolation of bacteria directly from blood cultures for rapid downstream analysis using haemolytic agents to replace the gold-standard purity plate subculture. However, many of these methods impact bacterial viability during the early stages of growth. Rapid phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing requires a pure inoculum of actively dividing bacteria to deliver early results (within 3 h), but most isolation chemistries are developed for mass spectrometry identification which does not require viable bacteria. This is particularly relevant for Gram-positive pathogens, as these are more susceptible to detergent agents used for haemolysis. This study investigated five different blood lysis protocols for the isolation of two different bacteria; Escherichia coli (Gram-negative) and Staphylococcus aureus (Gram-positive) from positive blood bottles. Bacterial viability was determined with microfluidic impedance cytometry and standard colony counting, which was also used to determine the extraction efficiency. For all five protocols, the numbers of extracted bacteria were generally high for the two organisms when determined with colony counting (following overnight incubation). However, when determined immediately after extraction with impedance cytometry, the counts were lower for S. aureus. The bacterial viability was also investigated with optical flow cytometry immediately after extraction showing inhibition of S. aureus growth with Sepsityper® but not with the milder detergent saponin.

Graphical Abstract

从阳性血培养中分离活菌:阻抗细胞术分析。
血流感染(bsi)导致败血症,这是一种与高死亡率相关的急性炎症反应。目前的临床治疗途径依赖于基于培养的诊断来识别感染因子并确定其对抗生素的易感性,从而延迟了靶向治疗。最近加速这一进程的方法集中在直接从血液培养物中分离细菌,使用溶血剂替代金标准纯度平板传代培养进行快速下游分析。然而,许多这些方法在生长的早期阶段影响细菌的生存能力。快速表型抗菌药物敏感性测试需要积极分裂细菌的纯接种来提供早期结果(在3小时内),但大多数分离化学物质是为质谱鉴定而开发的,不需要活菌。这与革兰氏阳性病原体特别相关,因为它们更容易受到用于溶血的洗涤剂的影响。本研究探讨了分离两种不同细菌的五种不同的血液溶解方案;阳性血瓶中检出大肠杆菌(革兰氏阴性)和金黄色葡萄球菌(革兰氏阳性)。采用微流控阻抗细胞术和标准菌落计数法测定细菌活力,并测定提取效率。对于所有五种方案,当用菌落计数(过夜孵育后)确定时,两种生物提取的细菌数量通常较高。然而,当提取后立即用阻抗细胞术检测时,金黄色葡萄球菌的计数较低。提取后立即用光学流式细胞术检测细菌活力,结果显示Sepsityper®对金黄色葡萄球菌生长有抑制作用,而较温和的洗涤剂皂苷对金黄色葡萄球菌生长没有抑制作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomedical Microdevices
Biomedical Microdevices 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
32
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Biomedical Microdevices: BioMEMS and Biomedical Nanotechnology is an interdisciplinary periodical devoted to all aspects of research in the medical diagnostic and therapeutic applications of Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (BioMEMS) and nanotechnology for medicine and biology. General subjects of interest include the design, characterization, testing, modeling and clinical validation of microfabricated systems, and their integration on-chip and in larger functional units. The specific interests of the Journal include systems for neural stimulation and recording, bioseparation technologies such as nanofilters and electrophoretic equipment, miniaturized analytic and DNA identification systems, biosensors, and micro/nanotechnologies for cell and tissue research, tissue engineering, cell transplantation, and the controlled release of drugs and biological molecules. Contributions reporting on fundamental and applied investigations of the material science, biochemistry, and physics of biomedical microdevices and nanotechnology are encouraged. A non-exhaustive list of fields of interest includes: nanoparticle synthesis, characterization, and validation of therapeutic or imaging efficacy in animal models; biocompatibility; biochemical modification of microfabricated devices, with reference to non-specific protein adsorption, and the active immobilization and patterning of proteins on micro/nanofabricated surfaces; the dynamics of fluids in micro-and-nano-fabricated channels; the electromechanical and structural response of micro/nanofabricated systems; the interactions of microdevices with cells and tissues, including biocompatibility and biodegradation studies; variations in the characteristics of the systems as a function of the micro/nanofabrication parameters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书