Probabilistic T-spherical hesitant fuzzy decision support for selecting advanced tertiary wastewater treatment technologies using comprehensive distance based ranking method

IF 9.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Journal of Environmental Management Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-10-06 DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.131057
Krishnan Suvitha, Kannusamy Aarthi, Samayan Narayanamoorthy, Naif Almakayeel, Daekook Kang
{"title":"Probabilistic T-spherical hesitant fuzzy decision support for selecting advanced tertiary wastewater treatment technologies using comprehensive distance based ranking method","authors":"Krishnan Suvitha,&nbsp;Kannusamy Aarthi,&nbsp;Samayan Narayanamoorthy,&nbsp;Naif Almakayeel,&nbsp;Daekook Kang","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.131057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pharmaceuticals, microplastics, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and endocrine-disrupting compounds are increasingly discharged in treated wastewater, are not effectively removed by conventional secondary treatment, and have important implications for the environment and human health. Advanced tertiary treatment is needed for safe reuse of urban non-potable water, but the choice among competing technologies is a complex decision involving technical, economic, environmental and regulatory considerations, as well as uncertainty and reluctance in expert evaluations. To address this issue, this research uses a decision support system based on Probabilistic T-Spherical Hesitant Fuzzy Numbers (Pt-SHFNs) that represents probabilistic uncertainty, ambiguity and expert hesitance consistently. A hybrid method is used to find criteria weights. The hybrid method combines the Level-Based Weight Assessment (LBWA) technique and changes of empirical data. This allows the subjective preferences of experts and objective evidence to be simultaneously considered. Then the alternatives are ranked using Comprehensive Distance Based Ranking (COBRA) technique. The results show that in the practical case of seven tertiary treatment systems, the effectiveness of removal of emerging pollutants (0.2319) and capital expenditures (0.1713) are the most influential factors. The most efficient systems are hybrid membrane-advanced oxidation process systems (0.0338) followed by ozonation-biofiltration (0.0203) and nanofiltration membranes (-0.0022). The stability analysis and comparison studies with other MCDM techniques increase the dependability and consistency of the obtained rankings. The proposed technique provides an explicit and uncertainty-aware basis for ranking tertiary alternatives to treatment and could assist wastewater utilities and regulators in integrating technical decisions with sustainability and water reuse objectives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"418 ","pages":"Article 131057"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030147972602517X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pharmaceuticals, microplastics, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and endocrine-disrupting compounds are increasingly discharged in treated wastewater, are not effectively removed by conventional secondary treatment, and have important implications for the environment and human health. Advanced tertiary treatment is needed for safe reuse of urban non-potable water, but the choice among competing technologies is a complex decision involving technical, economic, environmental and regulatory considerations, as well as uncertainty and reluctance in expert evaluations. To address this issue, this research uses a decision support system based on Probabilistic T-Spherical Hesitant Fuzzy Numbers (Pt-SHFNs) that represents probabilistic uncertainty, ambiguity and expert hesitance consistently. A hybrid method is used to find criteria weights. The hybrid method combines the Level-Based Weight Assessment (LBWA) technique and changes of empirical data. This allows the subjective preferences of experts and objective evidence to be simultaneously considered. Then the alternatives are ranked using Comprehensive Distance Based Ranking (COBRA) technique. The results show that in the practical case of seven tertiary treatment systems, the effectiveness of removal of emerging pollutants (0.2319) and capital expenditures (0.1713) are the most influential factors. The most efficient systems are hybrid membrane-advanced oxidation process systems (0.0338) followed by ozonation-biofiltration (0.0203) and nanofiltration membranes (-0.0022). The stability analysis and comparison studies with other MCDM techniques increase the dependability and consistency of the obtained rankings. The proposed technique provides an explicit and uncertainty-aware basis for ranking tertiary alternatives to treatment and could assist wastewater utilities and regulators in integrating technical decisions with sustainability and water reuse objectives.
基于综合距离排序法的污水三级处理技术选择的概率t球犹豫模糊决策支持。
药物、微塑料、全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)以及干扰内分泌的化合物越来越多地排放到经处理的废水中,无法通过常规二级处理有效去除,并对环境和人类健康产生重要影响。城市非饮用水的安全回用需要高级三级处理,但在相互竞争的技术之间进行选择是一个复杂的决定,涉及技术、经济、环境和管理方面的考虑,以及专家评价的不确定性和不情愿。为了解决这一问题,本研究使用了一个基于概率t球犹豫模糊数(Pt-SHFNs)的决策支持系统,该系统一致地表示概率不确定性、模糊性和专家犹豫。采用一种混合方法求准则权值。该方法将基于层次的权重评估技术与经验数据的变化相结合。这样就可以同时考虑专家的主观偏好和客观证据。然后利用综合距离排序(COBRA)技术对备选方案进行排序。结果表明,在7个三级处理系统的实际案例中,新出现污染物的去除效果(0.2319)和资本支出(0.1713)是影响最大的因素。最有效的系统是混合膜-高级氧化处理系统(0.0338),其次是臭氧-生物过滤(0.0203)和纳滤膜(-0.0022)。稳定性分析和与其他MCDM技术的比较研究增加了所获得排名的可靠性和一致性。拟议的技术提供了一个明确的和不确定的基础,对处理的三级替代方案进行排名,并可协助废水公用事业和监管机构将技术决策与可持续性和水再利用目标结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书