Probabilistic T-spherical hesitant fuzzy decision support for selecting advanced tertiary wastewater treatment technologies using comprehensive distance based ranking method
Krishnan Suvitha, Kannusamy Aarthi, Samayan Narayanamoorthy, Naif Almakayeel, Daekook Kang
{"title":"Probabilistic T-spherical hesitant fuzzy decision support for selecting advanced tertiary wastewater treatment technologies using comprehensive distance based ranking method","authors":"Krishnan Suvitha, Kannusamy Aarthi, Samayan Narayanamoorthy, Naif Almakayeel, Daekook Kang","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.131057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pharmaceuticals, microplastics, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and endocrine-disrupting compounds are increasingly discharged in treated wastewater, are not effectively removed by conventional secondary treatment, and have important implications for the environment and human health. Advanced tertiary treatment is needed for safe reuse of urban non-potable water, but the choice among competing technologies is a complex decision involving technical, economic, environmental and regulatory considerations, as well as uncertainty and reluctance in expert evaluations. To address this issue, this research uses a decision support system based on Probabilistic T-Spherical Hesitant Fuzzy Numbers (Pt-SHFNs) that represents probabilistic uncertainty, ambiguity and expert hesitance consistently. A hybrid method is used to find criteria weights. The hybrid method combines the Level-Based Weight Assessment (LBWA) technique and changes of empirical data. This allows the subjective preferences of experts and objective evidence to be simultaneously considered. Then the alternatives are ranked using Comprehensive Distance Based Ranking (COBRA) technique. The results show that in the practical case of seven tertiary treatment systems, the effectiveness of removal of emerging pollutants (0.2319) and capital expenditures (0.1713) are the most influential factors. The most efficient systems are hybrid membrane-advanced oxidation process systems (0.0338) followed by ozonation-biofiltration (0.0203) and nanofiltration membranes (-0.0022). The stability analysis and comparison studies with other MCDM techniques increase the dependability and consistency of the obtained rankings. The proposed technique provides an explicit and uncertainty-aware basis for ranking tertiary alternatives to treatment and could assist wastewater utilities and regulators in integrating technical decisions with sustainability and water reuse objectives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"418 ","pages":"Article 131057"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030147972602517X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Pharmaceuticals, microplastics, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and endocrine-disrupting compounds are increasingly discharged in treated wastewater, are not effectively removed by conventional secondary treatment, and have important implications for the environment and human health. Advanced tertiary treatment is needed for safe reuse of urban non-potable water, but the choice among competing technologies is a complex decision involving technical, economic, environmental and regulatory considerations, as well as uncertainty and reluctance in expert evaluations. To address this issue, this research uses a decision support system based on Probabilistic T-Spherical Hesitant Fuzzy Numbers (Pt-SHFNs) that represents probabilistic uncertainty, ambiguity and expert hesitance consistently. A hybrid method is used to find criteria weights. The hybrid method combines the Level-Based Weight Assessment (LBWA) technique and changes of empirical data. This allows the subjective preferences of experts and objective evidence to be simultaneously considered. Then the alternatives are ranked using Comprehensive Distance Based Ranking (COBRA) technique. The results show that in the practical case of seven tertiary treatment systems, the effectiveness of removal of emerging pollutants (0.2319) and capital expenditures (0.1713) are the most influential factors. The most efficient systems are hybrid membrane-advanced oxidation process systems (0.0338) followed by ozonation-biofiltration (0.0203) and nanofiltration membranes (-0.0022). The stability analysis and comparison studies with other MCDM techniques increase the dependability and consistency of the obtained rankings. The proposed technique provides an explicit and uncertainty-aware basis for ranking tertiary alternatives to treatment and could assist wastewater utilities and regulators in integrating technical decisions with sustainability and water reuse objectives.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.