A comprehensive framework for regional ecosystem health assessment: Integrating stability and distance to phase-optimal state

IF 9.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Journal of Environmental Management Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-30 DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.131039
Xiaohong Deng, Xiaolu Tian, Xiaoyue Hu, Fei Peng, Jian Xue, Zongxing Li
{"title":"A comprehensive framework for regional ecosystem health assessment: Integrating stability and distance to phase-optimal state","authors":"Xiaohong Deng,&nbsp;Xiaolu Tian,&nbsp;Xiaoyue Hu,&nbsp;Fei Peng,&nbsp;Jian Xue,&nbsp;Zongxing Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.131039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A sound assessment of ecosystem health is critical for ecosystem management and ecological restoration. Existing approaches often fail to integrate temporal stability with a relative optimal benchmark, potentially limiting ecological diagnosis and restoration planning. We designed a ternary framework comprising Current Characteristics (CC), Stability (SI), and Distance to the phase-Optimal state (DO). Each dimension encompasses State, Pattern, and Function, forming a 3 × 3 assessment matrix that represents ecosystem structure, spatial patterns, and ecological functions. Applying the framework to the Hexi region of northwestern China, we assessed ecosystem health changes from 2000 to 2020. Regional ecosystem health improved by 18.97% over this period but exhibited pronounced spatial heterogeneity. The comprehensive health index exhibited a distinct hump-shaped pattern, with higher values in the central-southern region than at the eastern and western ends. This pattern was associated with water availability, ecological baseline conditions, land-use intensity, and human pressures. Relatively high health values occurred in and around Qilian Mountain National Park, whereas the northwestern desert areas generally had lower values. The assessment identified eight detailed management zones, which were further aggregated into four functional zones. Urgent Intervention Zone covered 47.28% of the region, mainly in the west, whereas Self-Sustaining Conservation Zone covered 11.03% and were concentrated in Qilian Mountain National Park. By distinguishing current conditions, temporal stability, and proximity to the phase-optimal state, the framework supports differentiated restoration prioritization, spatial zoning, and monitoring of ecological management outcomes. It provides a potentially transferable approach to regional ecosystem health assessment and management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"418 ","pages":"Article 131039"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479726024990","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A sound assessment of ecosystem health is critical for ecosystem management and ecological restoration. Existing approaches often fail to integrate temporal stability with a relative optimal benchmark, potentially limiting ecological diagnosis and restoration planning. We designed a ternary framework comprising Current Characteristics (CC), Stability (SI), and Distance to the phase-Optimal state (DO). Each dimension encompasses State, Pattern, and Function, forming a 3 × 3 assessment matrix that represents ecosystem structure, spatial patterns, and ecological functions. Applying the framework to the Hexi region of northwestern China, we assessed ecosystem health changes from 2000 to 2020. Regional ecosystem health improved by 18.97% over this period but exhibited pronounced spatial heterogeneity. The comprehensive health index exhibited a distinct hump-shaped pattern, with higher values in the central-southern region than at the eastern and western ends. This pattern was associated with water availability, ecological baseline conditions, land-use intensity, and human pressures. Relatively high health values occurred in and around Qilian Mountain National Park, whereas the northwestern desert areas generally had lower values. The assessment identified eight detailed management zones, which were further aggregated into four functional zones. Urgent Intervention Zone covered 47.28% of the region, mainly in the west, whereas Self-Sustaining Conservation Zone covered 11.03% and were concentrated in Qilian Mountain National Park. By distinguishing current conditions, temporal stability, and proximity to the phase-optimal state, the framework supports differentiated restoration prioritization, spatial zoning, and monitoring of ecological management outcomes. It provides a potentially transferable approach to regional ecosystem health assessment and management.
区域生态系统健康评价的综合框架:稳定性与阶段最优距离的整合。
良好的生态系统健康评价对生态系统管理和生态恢复至关重要。现有的方法往往不能将时间稳定性与相对最优基准相结合,从而可能限制生态诊断和恢复规划。我们设计了一个三元框架,包括电流特性(CC)、稳定性(SI)和到相位最优状态(DO)的距离。每个维度包括状态、模式和功能,形成一个代表生态系统结构、空间格局和生态功能的3 × 3评价矩阵。应用该框架对2000 - 2020年河西地区生态系统健康变化进行了评价。区域生态系统健康改善幅度为18.97%,但空间异质性明显。综合健康指数呈明显的驼峰型,中南部高于东部和西部。这种模式与水资源供应、生态基线条件、土地利用强度和人类压力有关。祁连山国家公园及其周边地区健康值较高,西北荒漠地区健康值普遍较低。评估确定了8个详细的管理区,这些管理区进一步汇总为4个功能区。紧急干预区占47.28%,主要集中在西部;自持保护区占11.03%,主要集中在祁连山国家公园。通过区分当前条件、时间稳定性和接近阶段最优状态,该框架支持不同的恢复优先级、空间分区和生态管理结果监测。它为区域生态系统健康评估和管理提供了一种潜在的可转移方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书